Coding of COPD Exacerbations and the Implications on Clinical Practice, Audit and Research

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 706-710
Author(s):  
C. Echevarria ◽  
J. Steer ◽  
S. C. Bourke
Author(s):  
Elisavet Chorafa ◽  
Elias Iosifidis ◽  
Sotirios Tsiodras ◽  
Athanasios Skoutelis ◽  
Eleni Kourkouni ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To audit clinical practice and implement an intervention to promote appropriate use of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (PAP). Design: Prospective multicenter before-and-after study. Setting: This study was conducted in 7 surgical departments of 3 major Greek hospitals. Methods: Active PAP surveillance in adults undergoing elective surgical procedures was performed before and after implementation of a multimodal intervention. The surveillance monitored use of appropriate antimicrobial agent according to international and local guidelines, appropriate timing and duration of PAP, overall compliance with all 3 parameters and the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs). The intervention included education, audit, and feedback. Results: Overall, 1,447 patients were included: 768 before and 679 after intervention. Overall compliance increased from 28.2% to 43.9% (P = .001). Use of antimicrobial agents compliant to international guidelines increased from 89.6% to 96.3% (P = .001). In 4 of 7 departments, compliance with appropriate timing was already >90%; an increase from 44.3% to 73% (P = .001) and from 20.4% to 60% (P = .001), respectively, was achieved in 2 other departments, whereas a decrease from 64.1% to 10.9% (P = .001) was observed in 1 department. All but one department achieved a shorter PAP duration, and most achieved duration of ~2 days. SSIs significantly decreased from 6.9% to 4% (P = .026). After the intervention, it was 2.3 times more likely for appropriate antimicrobial use, 14.7 times more likely to administer an antimicrobial for the appropriate duration and 5.3 times more likely to administer an overall appropriate PAP. Conclusion: An intervention based on education, audit, and feedback can significantly contribute to improvement of appropriate PAP administration; further improvement in duration is needed.


2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyuki Saito ◽  
Yasuo Kodama ◽  
Shunsuke Ono ◽  
Mizue Mutoh ◽  
Susumu Kawashima ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Pate ◽  
Michael Barrowman ◽  
David Webb ◽  
Jeanne M Pimenta ◽  
Kourtney J Davis ◽  
...  

IntroductionTraditional phase IIIb randomised trials may not reflect routine clinical practice. The Salford Lung Study in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (SLS COPD) allowed broad inclusion criteria and followed patients in routine practice. We assessed whether SLS COPD approximated the England COPD population and evidence for a Hawthorne effect.MethodsThis observational cohort study compared patients with COPD in the usual care arm of SLS COPD (2012–2014) with matched non-trial patients with COPD in England from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink database. Generalisability was explored with baseline demographics, clinical and treatment variables; outcomes included COPD exacerbations in adjusted models and pretrial versus peritrial comparisons.ResultsTrial participants were younger (mean, 66.7 vs 71.1 years), more deprived (most deprived quintile, 51.5% vs 21.4%), more current smokers (47.5% vs 32.1%), with more severe Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stages but less comorbidity than non-trial patients. There were no material differences in other characteristics. Acute COPD exacerbation rates were high in the trial population (98.37th percentile).ConclusionThe trial population was similar to the non-trial COPD population. We observed some evidence of a Hawthorne effect, with more exacerbations recorded in trial patients; however, the largest effect was observed through behavioural changes in patients and general practitioner coding practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document