Early Speech Perception and Later Language Development: Implications for the "Critical Period"

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 237-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia K. Kuhl ◽  
Barbara T. Conboy ◽  
Denise Padden ◽  
Tobey Nelson ◽  
Jessica Pruitt
2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Kuhl ◽  
Barbara Conboy ◽  
Denise Padden ◽  
Tobey Nelson ◽  
Jessica Pruitt

2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER B MARSCHIK ◽  
GIORGIO PINI ◽  
KATRIN D BARTL-POKORNY ◽  
MARTIN DUCKWORTH ◽  
MARKUS GUGATSCHKA ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Margaret CYCHOSZ ◽  
Michelle ERSKINE ◽  
Benjamin MUNSON ◽  
Jan EDWARDS

Abstract This study examined a potential lexicality advantage in young children's early speech production: do children produce sound sequences less accurately in nonwords than real words? Children aged 3;3-4;4 completed two tasks: a real word repetition task and a corresponding nonword repetition task. Each of the 23 real words had a paired consonant-vowel sequence in the nonword in word-initial position (e.g., ‘su’ in [ˈsutkes] ‘suitcase’ and [ˈsudrɑs]). The word-initial consonant-vowel sequences were kept constant between the paired words. Previous work on this topic compared different sequences of paired sounds, making it hard to determine if those results were due to a lexical or phonetic effect. Our results show that children reliably produced consonant-vowel sequences in real words more accurately than nonwords. The effect was most pronounced in children with smaller receptive vocabularies. Together, these results reinforce theories arguing for interactions between vocabulary size and phonology in language development.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. e292-e298
Author(s):  
Natalia Martinez Fernandes ◽  
Daniela Gil ◽  
Marisa Frasson de Azevedo

Introduction The mismatch negativity (MMN) is a negative long-latency auditory potential elicited by any discriminable change in a repetitive aspect of auditory stimulation. This evoked potential can provide cortical information about the sound processing, including in children who use cochlear implants. Objective To identify MMN characteristics regarding latency, amplitude, and wave area in cochlear implanted children and to identify associations among language development, speech perception and family involvement. Methods This is a descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study, which compared two groups: study group—children with cochlear implant, and control group—hearing children. The children were submitted to MMN evaluation with non-verbal tone burst stimulus, differing in frequency in sound field at 70 dBHL, with SmartEP equipment (Intelligent Hearing Systems, Miami, FL, USA). Speech perception and language development questionnaires were also applied, and the family participation in the rehabilitation process was classified. Results The occurrence of MMN was 73.3% for the control group and 53.3% for the study group. Values of latency, amplitude and area of MMN of children using cochlear implants were similar to those of hearing children, and did not differ between groups. The occurrence of MMN was not correlated to the variables of hearing, language and family categories. Conclusion Children with cochlear implants showed similar MMN responses to those of the children in the control group, with mean latency, amplitude and area of 208.9 ms (±12.8), -2.37 μV (±0.38) and 86.5 μVms (±23.4), respectively. There was no correlation between the presence of MMN and children's performance in the auditory and language development tests or family involvement during rehabilitation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document