Using Hierarchical Linear Growth Modeling to Identify Longitudinally Outperforming School Districts in the United States, 2009–2013

Author(s):  
Alex J. Bowers ◽  
Elizabeth C. Monroe
2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Sudfeld ◽  
Denise L. Jacobson ◽  
Noé M. Rueda ◽  
Daniela Neri ◽  
Armando J. Mendez ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-178
Author(s):  
Clyde Paul

Evidence continues to accumulate that mathematics education in the United States is facing a serious peril caused by the increasing shortage of qualified teachers. Dunathan (1979) surveyed school superintendents in nine midwestern states about this topic. Approximately 70 percent of those administrators who responded thought a shortage of qualified mathematics teacher applicants existed. Less than 5 percent indicated that they believed there was a surplus. A 1977 survey conducted by the federal government discovered that approximately one-fourth of the nation's school districts had at least one opening in some field for which no qualified applicant could be found (Jacobson, 1979). Data from other sources suggest that many of those unstaffed positions were in mathematics classrooms. Reporting figures prepared by the National Center for Education Statistics, Dessart (1979b) states “… 1100 mathematics teacher positions were unfilled in the secondary schools of the United States during the fall of 1977.” The November 26 issue of Education USA (“Teacher Shortage,” 1979) quotes the Houston, Texas, superintendent of schools as estimating “… that more than 5,000 of the school district's students have 'no certified mathematics or science teacher at a time when we are emphasizing those subjects.' “That same article reports that Dallas had 150 current vacancies, most of which were in mathematics, science, industrial arts, and special education at the secondary level.


Education ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Reitano

In the United States, school districts operate as a type of special purpose local government. Similar to general purpose governments, school districts are funded by own-source and intergovernmental revenues, although there is considerable variation in their revenue mix, contingent in part upon state-funding formulas. Unlike general purpose governments, school districts focus on the provision of public education to facilitate student learning, and therefore, expenditures are primarily relegated to teacher, support staff, and administrator salaries and benefits. Ensuring the provision of public education begins in part with the budget process. The school district budget process can assume different forms from incremental to rational and may involve a range of stakeholders, including elected officials and members of the public. Incremental budgeting begins with the prior-year budget and small upward increments, while alternatives can be based on rational decision-making theories, such as performance budgeting or zero-based budgeting. Despite these different potential budgeting methods, systematic evidence of their implantation in school districts is generally unavailable. As a complement to the budget process, school districts are also involved in financial management, which involves the strategic analysis of financial condition in the pursuit of financial resiliency and sustainability. In particular, school district budgeting and financial management involves strategically planning for and responding to internal and external trends to ensure continued public service provision in the form of public education. As a growing area of research, school district budgeting and financial management encompasses topics such as budget forecasting, financial condition analysis, optimization of fiscal reserves over the business cycle, and debt management, among other topics.


Author(s):  
Robert Garda ◽  
Wendy Hensel ◽  
Paul O’Neill

School choice is one of the primary education reforms currently sweeping the United States. School choice systems create unique challenges for students with disabilities and schools of choice in serving such students. While there are a variety of school choice systems, this chapter focuses on three types of school choice models—charter schools, portfolio school districts, and voucher programs—and the unique policy and legal challenges they present for students with disabilities. Specifically, this chapter examines the interplay of these school choice reforms with the United States laws regarding students with disabilities: the Individuals with Education in Disabilities Act (IDEA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (Section 504), and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The challenges, barriers and problems are examined and solutions are proposed that consider both the laws regarding students with disabilities and the structures of the choice programs.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle F. Miller ◽  
Lara DePadilla ◽  
Sherry Everett Jones ◽  
Michael Lionbarger ◽  
Sally Thigpen

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-320
Author(s):  
Matthew Gardner Kelly

This article investigates trends in the relative wealth of the richest school districts in the United States between 2000 and 2015. For the purposes of discussion, I focus on the top 1% of districts. I argue that trends in school funding for the richest districts deserve greater attention from education researchers. Districts in the top 1% of the cost-adjusted, national school funding distribution are disproportionately suburban, affluent, and White. The relative wealth of these districts increased sharply (31.59%) between 2000 and 2015. Disaggregating these trends reveals large variation between states. Nevertheless, resource concentration in the top percentile of school districts increased in a large majority of states. These findings cannot be explained by efforts to provide additional educational resources to students with the greatest needs, and they suggest the ways in which the concentration of affluence accompanying growing economic inequality may be changing school funding.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 356-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen H. Johnson ◽  
Erin D. Maughan ◽  
Martha Dewey Bergren ◽  
Linda C. Wolfe ◽  
Jessica Gerdes

Step Up & Be Counted! (Step Up!) is an innovative project to collect nationally standardized data from the daily documentation of school nurses throughout the United States. Step Up! provides the standardization needed to promote an “apples to apples” analysis of school health resources, interventions, and outcomes across the United States. While some states have collected data for decades and have an effective infrastructure in place, other states are new to data collection and are creating processes to support data collection. Designated State Data Champions have volunteered to collect aggregated de-identified data from school districts throughout their state. The following is a discussion of some of the data collection innovations shared by Designated State Data Champions at the 2017 NASN Annual Conference.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document