scholarly journals Cementing of the hip arthroplasty stem increases load-to-failure force: a cadaveric study

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 445-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Klasan ◽  
Martin Bäumlein ◽  
Christopher Bliemel ◽  
Sven Edward Putnis ◽  
Thomas Neri ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712110525
Author(s):  
Ajay C. Lall ◽  
Hari K. Ankem ◽  
Michael K. Ryan ◽  
David P. Beason ◽  
Samantha C. Diulus ◽  
...  

Background: Ligamentum teres (LT) reconstruction is an appropriate alternative in select cases of LT full-thickness tears, resulting in hip micro- or macroinstability. Graft fixation at the acetabular fossa is critical to achieving the best functional results. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the pullout strength of 2 graft fixation methods used for LT reconstruction of the hip. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In 7 cadaveric specimens, the acetabular socket was prepared after the native LT was transected and the femoral head was removed. Seven separate tibialis anterior grafts were then prepared by suturing a running-locking No. 2 suture on each tail of the graft. Three specimens had fixation of the graft to the acetabulum using an adjustable cortical suspension suture button; the remaining 4 were fixed to the acetabulum using a knotless suture anchor. Specimens were then mounted onto a custom jig within a mechanical test frame to allow for the in-line pull of the graft fixation construct. After a preload of 5 N, each specimen was loaded to failure at 0.5 mm/s. Stiffness and load to failure were measured for each specimen construct. Results: Suture button fixation had a higher mean load to failure when compared with the knotless anchor fixation method (mean ± SD, 438.1 ± 114.3 vs 195.9 ± 50.0 N; P = .01). There was no significant difference in mean stiffness between the methods of fixation (24.5 ± 1.4 vs 26.5 ± 5.8 N/mm; P = .6). Conclusion: In this cadaveric study, the suture button fixation demonstrated greater load to failure than the knotless anchor fixation. Clinical Relevance: Results of this study can guide surgical decision making when selecting an acetabular fixation method for LT reconstruction.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Jae Lim ◽  
Sang-Min Kim ◽  
Byung-Ho Lim ◽  
Young-Wan Moon ◽  
Youn-Soo Park

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 617-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor Stubbs ◽  
Andrew S. Moon ◽  
Nicholas Dahlgren ◽  
Harshadkumar A. Patel ◽  
Aaradhana J. Jha ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy A. Burkhart ◽  
Mehrdad Khadem ◽  
Thomas J. Wood ◽  
Cynthia E. Dunning ◽  
Ryan Degen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110517
Author(s):  
Jobe Shatrov ◽  
Daniel Marsden-Jones ◽  
Matt Lyons ◽  
William L. Walter

Background: Incorrect acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with poor outcomes. Computer-assisted hip arthroplasty increases accuracy and consistency of cup positioning compared to conventional methods. Traditional navigation units have been associated with problems such as bulkiness of equipment and reproducibility of anatomical landmarks, particularly in obese patients or the lateral position. Purpose: We sought to evaluate the accuracy of a novel miniature inertial measurement system, the Navbit Sprint navigation device (Navbit, Sydney, Australia), to navigate acetabular component positioning in both the supine and lateral decubitus positions. We also aimed to validate a new method of patient registration that does not require acquisition of anatomical landmarks for navigation. Methods: We performed THA in a cadaveric study in supine and lateral positions using Navbit navigation to record cup position and compared mean scores from 3 Navbit devices for each cup position on post-implantation CT scans. Results: A total of 11 cups (5 supine and 6 lateral) were available for comparison. A difference of 2.34° in the supine direct anterior approach when assessing acetabular version was deemed to be statistically but not clinically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between CT and navigation measurements of cup position in the lateral position. Conclusion: This cadaveric study suggests that a novel inertial-based navigation tool is accurate for cup positioning in THA in the supine and lateral positions. Furthermore, it validates a novel registration method that does not require the identification of anatomical landmarks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. S62-S65
Author(s):  
Andrew S. McGee ◽  
Samuel R. Huntley ◽  
Zachary L. Littlefield ◽  
Haley M. McKissack ◽  
Ashish Shah ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 69-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Bullock ◽  
Michael De Gregorio ◽  
Kerry A. Danelson ◽  
Jeffery S. Willey ◽  
Michael E. Seem ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document