scholarly journals In-line Pullout Strength of 2 Acetabular Fixation Methods for Ligamentum Teres Reconstruction of the Hip: A Cadaveric Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712110525
Author(s):  
Ajay C. Lall ◽  
Hari K. Ankem ◽  
Michael K. Ryan ◽  
David P. Beason ◽  
Samantha C. Diulus ◽  
...  

Background: Ligamentum teres (LT) reconstruction is an appropriate alternative in select cases of LT full-thickness tears, resulting in hip micro- or macroinstability. Graft fixation at the acetabular fossa is critical to achieving the best functional results. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the pullout strength of 2 graft fixation methods used for LT reconstruction of the hip. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In 7 cadaveric specimens, the acetabular socket was prepared after the native LT was transected and the femoral head was removed. Seven separate tibialis anterior grafts were then prepared by suturing a running-locking No. 2 suture on each tail of the graft. Three specimens had fixation of the graft to the acetabulum using an adjustable cortical suspension suture button; the remaining 4 were fixed to the acetabulum using a knotless suture anchor. Specimens were then mounted onto a custom jig within a mechanical test frame to allow for the in-line pull of the graft fixation construct. After a preload of 5 N, each specimen was loaded to failure at 0.5 mm/s. Stiffness and load to failure were measured for each specimen construct. Results: Suture button fixation had a higher mean load to failure when compared with the knotless anchor fixation method (mean ± SD, 438.1 ± 114.3 vs 195.9 ± 50.0 N; P = .01). There was no significant difference in mean stiffness between the methods of fixation (24.5 ± 1.4 vs 26.5 ± 5.8 N/mm; P = .6). Conclusion: In this cadaveric study, the suture button fixation demonstrated greater load to failure than the knotless anchor fixation. Clinical Relevance: Results of this study can guide surgical decision making when selecting an acetabular fixation method for LT reconstruction.

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110405
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Fujii ◽  
Makoto Tateura ◽  
Masato Ogawa ◽  
Satoru Ozeki

Background: The initial ultimate load for graft fixation is one of the essential factors in the reconstruction of lateral ankle ligaments. Several anchoring devices have been developed to fix the substitute ligament into the bone. A fair comparison of these fixation methods warrant a reproducible examination system. The purpose of this study was to make an experimental animal model and to compare the initial ultimate loads of 3 graft fixation methods, including the use of EndoButton (EB), interference screw (IFS), and a novel socket anchoring (SA) technique. Methods: Porcine calcaneus bones and 5-mm-wide split bovine Achilles tendons were used as fixation bases and graft materials, respectively. Both ends were firmly sutured side-by-side, using the circumferential ligation technique as a double-strand substitute that was 45 mm in length. Porcine calcanei with similar characteristics to adult human calcanei were mounted on a tensile testing machine, and substitutes were fixed into bones using the 3 fixation methods. A polyester tape was passed through the tendon loop and connected to a crosshead jig of the testing machine. The initial ultimate loads were measured in 15 specimens for each fixation method to simulate a lateral ankle ligament (LAL) injury. Results: The ultimate loads (ULs) were 223.6 ± 52.7 N for EB, 229.7 ± 39.7 N for SA, and 208.8 ± 65.3 N for IFS. No statistically significant difference was observed among the 3 groups ( P = .571). All failures occurred at the bone–ligament substitute interface. Conclusion: The initial ULs in all 3 fixation methods were sufficient for clinical usage. These values were larger than the UL of the anterior talofibular ligament; however, these were smaller than the UL of the calcaneofibular ligament. Clinical Relevance: In an experimental animal model, ULs for SA, EB, and IFS techniques showed no significant difference. All failures were observed in the fixation site of the calcaneus and were overwhelmingly related to suture fixation failure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 247275122110192
Author(s):  
Karel Kuik ◽  
Jean Pierre T. F. Ho ◽  
Cornelis Klop ◽  
Maurits H. T. de Ruiter ◽  
Cornelis J. Kleverlaan ◽  
...  

Study Design: Biomechanical in vitro study. Mandibular advancement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is a common procedure in orthognathic surgery. Several fixation methods are used for stabilization of SSRO. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare a new fixation method (gridplate) with more contemporary applied methods of fixation. Material and Methods: In this study, 50 polyurethane hemimandibles with a prefabricated SSRO were used as specimens. All hemimandibles were advanced by 8 mm and divided into 5 groups with different fixation methods: (A) one 4-hole miniplate with 4 monocortical screws; (B) two 4-hole miniplates with 8 monocortical screws; (C) one 4-hole miniplate with 4 monocortical screws and 1 bicortical screw in the retromolar area (hybrid method); (D) 3 bicortical screws in an inverted-L pattern; and (E) one 8-hole gridplate with 8 monocortical screws. Loads in newtons were recorded at displacements of the mandibular incisive edge at 1 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm. Results: Fixation with 3 bicortical screws and the gridplate presented the most stability, followed by two 4-hole miniplates. Fixation with the hybrid method or the single miniplate showed the least stability. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the 8-hole gridplate design appears a sufficient fixation method regarding stabilization of SSRO with larger mandibular advancement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712198928
Author(s):  
Heath P. Gould ◽  
Nicholas R. Delaney ◽  
Brent G. Parks ◽  
Roshan T. Melvani ◽  
Richard Y. Hinton

Background: Femoral-sided graft fixation in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is commonly performed using an interference screw (IS). However, the IS method is associated with several clinical disadvantages that may be ameliorated by the use of suture anchors (SAs) for femoral fixation. Purpose: To compare the load to failure and stiffness of SAs versus an IS for the femoral fixation of a semitendinosus autograft in MPFL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Based on a priori power analysis, a total of 6 matched pairs of cadaveric knees were included. Specimens in each pair were randomly assigned to receive either SA or IS fixation. After an appropriate reconstruction procedure, the looped end of the MPFL graft was pulled laterally at a rate of 6 mm/s until construct failure. The best-fit slope of the load-displacement curve was then used to calculate the stiffness (N/mm) in a post hoc fashion. A paired t test was used to compare the mean load to failure and the mean stiffness between groups. Results: No significant difference in load to failure was observed between the IS and the SA fixation groups (294.0 ± 61.1 vs 250.0 ± 55.9; P = .352), although the mean stiffness was significantly higher in IS specimens (34.5 ± 9.6 vs 14.7 ± 1.2; P = .004). All IS reconstructions failed by graft pullout from the femoral tunnel, whereas 5 of the 6 SA reconstructions failed by anchor pullout. Conclusion: In this biomechanical study using a cadaveric model of MPFL reconstruction, SA femoral fixation was not significantly different from IS fixation in terms of load to failure. The mean load-to-failure values for both reconstruction techniques were greater than the literature-reported values for the native MPFL. Clinical Relevance: These results suggest that SAs are a biomechanically viable alternative for femoral-sided graft fixation in MPFL reconstruction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712097434
Author(s):  
Daniel F. O’Brien ◽  
Lilah Fones ◽  
Victoria Stoj ◽  
Cory Edgar ◽  
Katherine Coyner ◽  
...  

Background: Suspensory fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) grafts has emerged as a popular device for femoral graft fixation. However, improper deployment of the suspensory fixation can compromise proper graft tensioning, leading to failure and revision. Also, soft tissue interposition between the button and bone has been associated with graft migration and pain, occasionally requiring revision surgery. Many surgeons rely on manual testing and application of distal tension to the graft to confirm proper button deployment on the lateral cortex of the femur for ACL graft fixation. Purpose: To determine the reliability of the manual resistance maneuver when applying distal tension to deploy the suspensory device along the lateral cortex of the femur. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients undergoing ACLR with a suture button suspensory device for femoral fixation were eligible for enrollment in the study. The surgeries were performed by 3 board-certified, sports medicine fellowship–trained orthopaedic surgeons at a single outpatient surgical center between May 2018 and June 2019. All grafts were passed in a retrograde manner into the femoral tunnel, and a vigorous manual tensioning maneuver in a distal direction was placed on the graft to deploy and secure along the lateral cortex of the femur. Intraoperative mini c-arm fluoroscopy was obtained to demonstrate proper suture button positioning. If interposing tissue or an improperly flipped button was identified, rectifying steps were undertaken and recorded. Results: A total of 51 patients with a mean age of 33.3 years were included in the study. Of these patients, 74.5% had normal suture button positioning identified via intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, while 15.7% had interposed soft tissue and 9.8% had an improperly flipped button. In all cases, the surgeon was able to rectify the malpositioning intraoperatively. Conclusion: Despite the manual sensation of proper suspensory button positioning, intraoperative fluoroscopy identified suture button deployment errors in ACLR 25% of the time. Correcting the malpositioning is not technically demanding. These findings advocate for routine intraoperative surveillance to confirm appropriate suture button seating during ACLR.


2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. e1-e1
Author(s):  
Fumitaka TAKAHASHI ◽  
Takaharu HAKOZAKI ◽  
Nobuo KANNO ◽  
Yasuji HARADA ◽  
Shinya YAMAGUCHI ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1480-1487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suenghwan Jo ◽  
Alexander W. Hooke ◽  
Kai-Nan An ◽  
Robert T. Trousdale ◽  
Rafael J. Sierra

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0029
Author(s):  
Jun-Beom Kim ◽  
Chung-Han An

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate the morphologic characteristics of the medial malleolar fragment in ankle fractures and suggest the guideline for proper fixation of the fragment Methods: From August 2011 to June 2018, 172 cases were enrolled. There were performed the operation in ankle fractures with a medial malleolar fragment. All cases were divided into three types, based on the transverse fracture line of the medial malleolar by the CT (computed tomography) scan; type 1 was involved in the anterior colliculus, type 2 was the intercollicular groove and type 3 was the posterior colliculus. All cases were classified by Lauge-Hansen classification and compared with the groups statistically. The fixation methods by the groups were reviewed and compared. All cases were analyzed by SPSS 19.0, the p-value was less than 0.05. Results: According to the CT scan, type 1 was 14 cases (8.1%), type 2 was 48 cases (27.9%) and type 3 was 110 cases (63.9%). Based on the Lauge-Hansen classification, SER (supination-external rotation) type was 136 cases(76.4%), PER (pronation-external rotation) was 30 cases(17.4%) and PA(pronation abduction) was 8 cases(4.7%).In SER type, type 1 was 6 cases(4.4%), 2 was 42 cases(30.9%) and 3 was 86 cases(63.2%). In PER type, 1 was 6 cases (20%), 2 was 4 cases (13.3%) and 3 was 20 cases (18.9%). In PA type, 1 was 2 cases (25%), 2 was2 cases (25%) and 3 was 4 cases (50%). The fixation methods were various, such as a tension band wiring, 4.0 cannulated screw, hook plate. Conclusion: The morphology of a medial malleolar fragment based on CT scan in ankle fractures were 3 types. There was common a morphology involved the posterior colliculus, Type 3. We suggest that the operators should choose the proper fixation method by the morphology of the fragment and should be careful to avoid the injury of the posterior tibialis tendon.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0029
Author(s):  
Seiji Kimura ◽  
Satoshi Yamaguchi

Category: Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Reduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis is one of the most important factors that affect the clinical outcome after ankle malleolar fractures with syndesmotic diastasis. Recent studies have shown that suture-button fixation can yield better syndesmotic reduction than screw fixation immediately after surgery. However, the time-dependent change in the reduction for each fixation method has not been well studied. The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative changes in the syndesmotic reduction after surgical treatment of ankle malleolar fractures between suture-button fixation and screw fixation using bilateral computed tomography. Methods: Patients who sustained ankle malleolar fractures with tibiofibular diastasis and underwent tibiofibular fixation were included. Suture-button fixation (Group B; n=14; age, 39 years) was used between 2015 and 2016, and syndesmotic screw fixation (Group S; n=20; age, 35 years) was used between 2012 and 2014. The syndesmotic screws were routinely removed. Patients underwent CT scanning of the bilateral ankles at 2 time points: at 2 weeks and 1 year after fracture fixation. Side-to-side differences in the anterior and posterior tibiofibular distances, and anteroposterior fibular translation were measured. Syndesmotic melreduction was defined as a side-to-side difference?2 mm in either of the measurements. The changes in each measurement and incidence of malreduction for each group were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and McNemar’s test. Differences between the two groups at each time point were also compared. Results: At 2 weeks after fracture fixation, the side-to-side difference in anterior tibiofibular distance was significantly wider in Group B (1.9 mm) than in Group S (0.7 mm) (p=0.03). Additionally, the fibulas were more translated posteriorly in Group B (1.5 mm) than in Group S (0.2 mm). At 1 year, the anterior tibiofibular distance decreased to 0.8 mm in Group B (p=0.09). On the contrary, it significantly increased to 1.9 mm in Group S (p=0.002). In Group B, the incidences of malreduction were 4/14 and 2/14 at 2 weeks and 1 year, respectively (p=0.74). Two ankles, which were malreduced at 2 weeks, changed to a reduced syndesmosis at 1 year. In Group S, the incidences were 8/20 and 9/20 at 2 weeks and 1 year, respectively (p=0.35). Conclusion: Syndesmotic alignment changed over time in both fixation methods, however, the patterns of change were different. Using suture-button fixation, the anterior tibiofibular distance decreased over time. As a result, the widened syndesmoses at 2 weeks changed to reduced syndesmoses at 1 year. On the contrary, using tibiofibular screw fixation, the anterior tibiofibular distance widened after screw removal. Our result suggests that the flexible suture-button fixation allows the fibula to move to the optimal location over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document