Movements or targets: What makes an action in action–effect learning?

2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 2433-2449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Hoffmann ◽  
Alexandra Lenhard ◽  
Albrecht Sebald ◽  
Roland Pfister
2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 1273-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uta Wolfensteller ◽  
Hannes Ruge

2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Karbach ◽  
Jutta Kray ◽  
Bernhard Hommel

Neuroscience ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 231 ◽  
pp. 13-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Melcher ◽  
D. Winter ◽  
B. Hommel ◽  
R. Pfister ◽  
P. Dechent ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 68 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 138-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Elsner ◽  
Bernhard Hommel

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannes Ruge ◽  
Ruth M. Krebs ◽  
Uta Wolfensteller

2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Pfister ◽  
Andrea Kiesel ◽  
Joachim Hoffmann

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 1186-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Wirth ◽  
Robert Steinhauser ◽  
Markus Janczyk ◽  
Marco Steinhauser ◽  
Wilfried Kunde

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Betina Korka ◽  
Erich Schröger ◽  
Andreas Widmann

AbstractOur brains continuously build and update predictive models of the world, sources of prediction being drawn for example from sensory regularities and/or our own actions. Yet, recent results in the auditory system indicate that stochastic regularities may not be easily encoded when a rare medium pitch deviant is presented between frequent high and low pitch standard sounds in random order, as reflected in the lack of sensory prediction error event-related potentials [i.e., mismatch negativity (MMN)]. We wanted to test the implication of the predictive coding theory that predictions based on higher-order generative models—here, based on action intention, are fed top-down in the hierarchy to sensory levels. Participants produced random sequences of high and low pitch sounds by button presses in two conditions: In a “specific” condition, one button produced high and the other low pitch sounds; in an “unspecific” condition, both buttons randomly produced high or low-pitch sounds. Rare medium pitch deviants elicited larger MMN and N2 responses in the “specific” compared to the “unspecific” condition, despite equal sound probabilities. These results thus demonstrate that action-effect predictions can boost stochastic regularity-based predictions and engage higher-order deviance detection processes, extending previous notions on the role of action predictions at sensory levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document