Integrated Services or Pullout? Factors Influencing School-based Occupational Therapy Service Delivery Models

Author(s):  
Heather Watt ◽  
Lorie Gage Richards ◽  
Heidi Woolley ◽  
Pollie Price ◽  
Sarah Gray
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyndsey Pollack Zurawski

Changing service delivery models can be difficult for a variety of reasons. The expanding roles and responsibilities of school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) along with the implementation of Common Core State Standards (CCSS) only create more pressure. Implementation of the CCSS does not have to be an anxiety driven task. School-based SLPs can accept the challenge of providing inclusive-based services to meet the diverse needs of the SLPs caseload while providing educationally relevant services.


1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Case-Smith ◽  
Judy Cable

School-based occupational therapists provide direct services, with the child removed from the classroom and integrated, and consultative services within the classroom, involving the teacher and members of the teaching staff. The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of time that school-based therapists spend using direct/pull-out and integrative/consultative models of service delivery, to explore the attitudes of occupational therapists toward direct/pull-out and integrative/consultative services, and to identify variables associated with attitudes toward each. Written forced choice surveys were mailed to 321 school-based occupational therapists, and data analysis included 216 (67% of the sample). Therapists spent 47% of the time providing pull-out services and 53% of the time in the classroom and in consultation. Although the respondents indicated that they enjoyed one-on-one interaction with students, they disagreed that children with disabilities were best served when pulled out of the classroom. Attitudes toward consultation were positive; therapists enjoyed sharing their expertise and believed that therapy should be integrated throughout the school day. Time spent using pull-out services and consultation was highly related to attitude toward that service delivery model; therapists who provided primarily consultation were significantly lower in their ratings of the importance of direct, pull-out services. Therapists who were contracted by the school used pull-out services more than did those employed in the school (58% compared with 44%). School-based therapists appear to use a variety of service delivery models and have blended direct services with integrative/consultative services. They identified advantages to the use of both models and seem to believe that children are best served when direct services are combined with those that integrate therapy into the classroom and involve consultation with teachers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (02) ◽  
pp. 162-176
Author(s):  
Sue Grogan-Johnson

AbstractSchool-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are implementing telecommunication technologies for service provision. Telepractice is one among an array of service delivery models that can be successfully implemented in the public-school setting. While many school-based SLPs have been plunged into telepractice with the recent pandemic, this temporary shift to emergency instruction is not the same as fully implementing a telepractice service delivery model. SLPs who recognize the potential application of telecommunications would profit from additional training and experience to take advantage of the benefits of this service delivery model. The purpose of this article is to explore the concept of telepractice as a service delivery model, and to answer the who, what, when, where, and why questions of school-based telepractice. Telepractice is one of several service delivery models that school-based SLPs can confidently utilize to provide effective speech and language therapy services to school-age students.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Carol Dudding

Whether in our professional or private lives, we are all aware of the system wide efforts to provide quality healthcare services while containing the costs. Telemedicine as a method of service delivery has expanded as a result of changes in reimbursement and service delivery models. The growth and sustainability of telehealth within speech-language pathology and audiology, like any other service, depends on the ability to be reimbursed for services provided. Currently, reimbursement for services delivered via telehealth is variable and depends on numerous factors. An understanding of these factors and a willingness to advocate for increased reimbursement can bolster the success of practitioners interested in the telehealth as a service delivery method.


2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
CATHERINE J. EVANS ◽  
LUCY ISON ◽  
CLARE ELLIS‐SMITH ◽  
CAROLINE NICHOLSON ◽  
ALESSIA COSTA ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document