scholarly journals A social–cultural analysis of the individual education plan practice in special education schools in China

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-66
Author(s):  
Wangqian Fu ◽  
Sha Lu ◽  
Fei Xiao ◽  
Mian Wang
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Boyd

Background: The Individual Education Plan (IEP) and related resource documents shape the lived realities of children in special education programs. Although these documents aim to assist children in achieving their educational goals, a point of disjuncture can exist between the documents’ intentions and the actual experiences of children. Addressing this issue is crucial in order to prevent inequality and to foster educational development and social well being for children. Purpose: This study explores the discursive construction of children in IEP resource documents in order to illuminate the underlying implications of the language comprising these texts. Method: Data was collected by gathering IEP resource documents from the Ontario Ministry of Education website. Discourse analysis was then employed to examine the presence of the equative and attributive models, the passive voice, and the possessive construction. Lastly, disability theory was used to explore how these language practices conceptualize children. Results: The data set included zero instances of the equative model, an infrequent use of the attributive model, and a strong presence of both the passive voice and the possessive construction. These findings contributed to representations of children as exceptional, passive, and subordinate despite an explicit attempt to resist such conceptions. Conclusion: This study serves as a model through which the language practices of other special education documents can be critically evaluated, and offers potential avenues for creating documents that avoid disabling children further.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Boyd

Background: The Individual Education Plan (IEP) and related resource documents shape the lived realities of children in special education programs. Although these documents aim to assist children in achieving their educational goals, a point of disjuncture can exist between the documents’ intentions and the actual experiences of children. Addressing this issue is crucial in order to prevent inequality and to foster educational development and social well being for children. Purpose: This study explores the discursive construction of children in IEP resource documents in order to illuminate the underlying implications of the language comprising these texts. Method: Data was collected by gathering IEP resource documents from the Ontario Ministry of Education website. Discourse analysis was then employed to examine the presence of the equative and attributive models, the passive voice, and the possessive construction. Lastly, disability theory was used to explore how these language practices conceptualize children. Results: The data set included zero instances of the equative model, an infrequent use of the attributive model, and a strong presence of both the passive voice and the possessive construction. These findings contributed to representations of children as exceptional, passive, and subordinate despite an explicit attempt to resist such conceptions. Conclusion: This study serves as a model through which the language practices of other special education documents can be critically evaluated, and offers potential avenues for creating documents that avoid disabling children further.


Author(s):  
Cynthia Sistek-Chandler

The purpose of this chapter is to provide Pre-K through college educators, parents, and administrators who are involved with special education, insight into the processes and procedures from the perspective of a parent. The parent's perspective and involvement with their special needs child is critical in shaping the lifelong, special education experience. The literature and research shows a strong correlation to student success when parents are actively involved in this process. Rooted in the federal and state guidelines from the 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), all students are entitled to education services from birth through age 21. Recommendations for the Individual Education Plan process as well as strategies for navigating special education services are revealed in this narrative.


Strategies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 32-35
Author(s):  
Scott W. T. McNamara ◽  
Lauren J. Lieberman ◽  
Brad Weiner ◽  
Brock McMullen

1995 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
David W. Brown ◽  
Walter G. Mcintire

In this paper the changing expectations Americans have for their schools, the challenges for providing leadership in rapidly changing rural school settings, and the changing nature of students served in rural schools are explored. It is suggested that the Individual Education Plan (IEP) process developed by special educators for special education students can be a model for educational planning for all students, given the nature of group cohesion that results from having a common goal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document