Biophysical compartment models for single-shell diffusion MRI in the human brain: a model fitting comparison

Author(s):  
Andrew D Davis ◽  
Stefanie Hassel ◽  
Stephen R Arnott ◽  
Geoffrey B Hall ◽  
Jacqueline K Harris ◽  
...  

Abstract Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zero b-value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting of b=1000 s/mm2. To produce microstructural parameter maps, the tensor model is usually used, despite known limitations. Although compartment models have demonstrated improved fits in multi-shell dMRI data, they are rarely used for single-shell parameter maps, where their effectiveness is unclear from the literature. Here, various compartment models combining isotropic balls and symmetric tensors were fitted to single-shell dMRI data to investigate model fitting optimization and extract the most information possible. Full testing was performed in 5 subjects, and 3 subjects with multi-shell data were included for comparison. The results were tested and confirmed in a further 50 subjects. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model fitting technique outperformed non-linear least squares. Using MCMC, the 2-fibre-orientation mono-exponential ball & stick model (BSME 2) provided artifact-free, stable results, in little processing time. The analogous ball & zeppelin model (BZ2) also produced stable, low-noise parameter maps, though it required much greater computing resources (50 000 burn-in steps). In single-shell data, the gamma-distributed diffusivity ball & stick model (BSGD 2) underperformed relative to other models, despite being an often-used software default. It produced artifacts in the diffusivity maps even with extremely long processing times. Neither increased diffusion weighting nor a greater number of gradient orientations improved BSGD 2 fits. In white matter (WM), the tensor produced the best fit as measured by Bayesian information criterion. This result contrasts with studies using multi-shell data. However, in crossing fibre regions the tensor confounded geometric effects with fractional anisotropy (FA): the planar/linear WM FA ratio was 49%, while BZ2 and BSME 2 retained 76% and 83% of restricted fraction, respectively. As a result, the BZ2 and BSME 2 models are strong candidates to optimize information extraction from single-shell dMRI studies.

Author(s):  
L. Brusini ◽  
F. Cruciani ◽  
I. Boscolo Galazzo ◽  
A. Galbusera ◽  
M. Borin ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 288-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Kunz ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Lana Vasung ◽  
Kieran R. O'Brien ◽  
Yaniv Assaf ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime Taquet ◽  
Benoit Scherrer ◽  
Nicolas Boumal ◽  
Jurriaan M. Peters ◽  
Benoit Macq ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.L. Harms ◽  
A. Roebroeck

AbstractIn diffusion MRI analysis, advances in biophysical multi-compartment modeling have gained popularity over the conventional Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), because they possess greater specificity in relating the dMRI signal to underlying cellular microstructure. Biophysical multi-compartment models require parameter estimation, typically performed using either Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) or using Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) sampling. Whereas MLE provides only a point estimate of the fitted model parameters, MCMC recovers the entire posterior distribution of the model parameters given the data, providing additional information such as parameter uncertainty and correlations. MCMC sampling is currently not routinely applied in dMRI microstructure modeling because it requires adjustments and tuning specific to each model, particularly in the choice of proposal distributions, burn-in length, thinning and the number of samples to store. In addition, sampling often takes at least an order of magnitude more time than non-linear optimization. Here we investigate the performance of MCMC algorithm variations over multiple popular diffusion microstructure models to see whether a single well performing variation could be applied efficiently and robustly to many models. Using an efficient GPU-based implementation, we show that run times can be removed as a prohibitive constraint for sampling of diffusion multi-compartment models. Using this implementation, we investigated the effectiveness of different adaptive MCMC algorithms, burn-in, initialization and thinning. Finally we apply the theory of Effective Sample Size to diffusion multi-compartment models as a way of determining a relatively general target for the number of samples needed to characterize parameter distributions for different models and datasets. We conclude that robust and fast sampling is achieved in most diffusion microstructure models with the Adaptive Metropolis-Within-Gibbs (AMWG) algorithm initialized with an MLE point estimate, in which case 100 to 200 samples are sufficient as a burn-in and thinning is mostly unnecessary. As a relatively general target for the number of samples, we recommend a multivariate Effective Sample Size of 2200.


2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1785-1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uran Ferizi ◽  
Torben Schneider ◽  
Eleftheria Panagiotaki ◽  
Gemma Nedjati-Gilani ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document