scholarly journals Constraining ultra-light axions with galaxy cluster number counts

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (08) ◽  
pp. 004
Author(s):  
J. Diehl ◽  
J. Weller
2010 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Basilakos ◽  
M. Plionis ◽  
J. A. S. Lima

2013 ◽  
Vol 432 (2) ◽  
pp. 1513-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Chandrachani Devi ◽  
T. Roy Choudhury ◽  
Anjan A. Sen

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (08) ◽  
pp. 005-005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Lacasa ◽  
Rogerio Rosenfeld

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thibaut Louis ◽  
David Alonso
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (S306) ◽  
pp. 216-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Lacasa

AbstractPresent and future large scale surveys offer promising probes of cosmology. For example the Dark Energy Survey (DES) is forecast to detect ~300 millions galaxies and thousands clusters up to redshift ~1.3. I here show ongoing work to combine two probes of large scale structure : cluster number counts and galaxy 2-point function (in real or harmonic space). The halo model (coupled to a Halo Occupation Distribution) can be used to model the cross-covariance between these probes, and I introduce a diagrammatic method to compute easily the different terms involved. Furthermore, I compute the joint non-Gaussian likelihood, using the Gram-Charlier series. Then I show how to extend the methods of Bayesian hyperparameters to Poissonian distributions, in a first step to include them in this joint likelihood.


1999 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 255-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsu Kitayama ◽  
Shin Sasaki ◽  
Yasushi Suto

We compute the number counts of clusters of galaxies, the logN-logS relation, in several X-ray and submm bands on the basis of the Press—Schechter theory (Kitayama et al. 1998). We pay particular attention to a set of theoretical models which well reproduce the ROSAT 0.5–2 keV band logN-logS (Ebeling et al. 1997; Rosati et al. 1997), and explore possibilities to further constrain the models from future observations with ASCA and/or at submm bands. The latter is closely related to the European PLANCK mission and the Japanese LMSA project. We exhibit that one can break the degeneracy in an acceptable parameter region on the Ω0–σ8 plane by combining the ROSAT logN-logS and the submm number counts. Models which reproduce the ROSAT band logN-logS will have N(> S) ∼ (150–300)(S/10−12 erg cm−2 s−) −1.3 str−1 at S ≳ 10−12 erg cm−2 s−1 in the ASCA 2–10 keV band, and N(> Sv) ∼ (102–104)(Sv/100 mJy)−1.5 str−1 at Sv ≳ 100m J y in the submm (0.85mm) band. The amplitude of the logN-logS is very sensitive to the model parameters in the submm band. We also compute the redshift evolution of the cluster number counts and compare with that of the X-ray brightest Abell-type clusters (Ebeling et al. 1996). The results, although still preliminary, point to low density (Ω0 ∼ 0.3) universes. The contribution of clusters to the X-ray and submm background radiations is shown to be insignificant in any model compatible with the ROSAT logN-logS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 507 (4) ◽  
pp. 4852-4863
Author(s):  
Íñigo Zubeldia ◽  
Aditya Rotti ◽  
Jens Chluba ◽  
Richard Battye

Abstract Matched filters are routinely used in cosmology in order to detect galaxy clusters from mm observations through their thermal Sunyaev–Zeldovich (tSZ) signature. In addition, they naturally provide an observable, the detection signal-to-noise or significance, which can be used as a mass proxy in number counts analyses of tSZ-selected cluster samples. In this work, we show that this observable is, in general, non-Gaussian, and that it suffers from a positive bias, which we refer to as optimization bias. Both aspects arise from the fact that the signal-to-noise is constructed through an optimization operation on noisy data, and hold even if the cluster signal is modelled perfectly well, no foregrounds are present, and the noise is Gaussian. After reviewing the general mathematical formalism underlying matched filters, we study the statistics of the signal-to-noise with a set Monte Carlo mock observations, finding it to be well-described by a unit-variance Gaussian for signal-to-noise values of 6 and above, and quantify the magnitude of the optimization bias, for which we give an approximate expression that may be used in practice. We also consider the impact of the bias on the cluster number counts of Planck and the Simons Observatory (SO), finding it to be negligible for the former and potentially significant for the latter.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document