Peer review declaration the 6th International Conference of Indonesia Forestry Researchers - Stream 1 Emerging Environmental Quality for Better Living (INAFOR 2021 Stream 1)

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind review process • Conference submission management system: Submission through conference website for abstract and secretariat official email for full paper, [email protected] PIC: Aryani [email protected] PIC: Fathimah Handayani • Number of submissions received: 89 • Number of submissions sent for review: 88 • Number of submissions accepted: 78 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 87.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 35 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Aryani/Fathimah Handayani Affiliation : Center for Standardization of Sustainable Forest Management Instruments, Bogor, Indonesia Email : [email protected]/[email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer Review Declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/926/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 926 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Contact Person ◽

Blind Review ◽

Minor Revision ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Table 1 shows the evaluation aspects in the review process at The 3rd ICoGEE 2021. Several essential things in scientific articles are reviewed through this evaluation aspect, such as novelty, originality, clarity of methods and analysis, and their significance in science and technology. If an evaluation aspect has less than good quality, the reviewer provides suggestions for improvement, and the author must improve it or provide feedback. The reviewer will also offer recommendations such as: (i) accept without revision (if all aspects of the evaluation have exceptional score), (ii) accept with minor revision (if there are less than two evaluation aspects whose quality is below good), (iii) accept with major revision (if there are about 2 - 4 evaluation aspects that are below good quality), and (iv) reject (if more than four evaluation aspects have below good quality or are considered not to meet the essential requirements of scientific articles). • Conference submission management system: For official The 3rd ICoGEE 2021 webpage, we used: http://icogee.org, while for paper management system, we used Easy Chair: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=icogee2021 • Number of submissions received: 197 • Number of submissions sent for review: 197 • Number of submissions accepted: 114 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 57,86% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 41 • Any additional info on review process: All papers had undergone plagiarism check (using Turnitin) and single-blind review by two reviewers • Contact person for queries: Name : Yuant Tiandho Affiliation : Department of Physics, Universitas Bangka Belitung Email : [email protected] / [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer Review Declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/927/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 927 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Similarity Score ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Analysis Techniques ◽

Email Address ◽

Check System ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review : Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? ∘ The review was done by considering five (5) aspects : 1) Relevance with topics 2) Novelty and originality 3) Clarity 4) Systematic 5) Analysis techniques and deduction ∘ One reviewer gave points on each aspect between 1-4. Based on total points from those four aspects : 1) Definitely Accept : 16-20 2) Accept : 11-15 3) Possibly Accept : 7-10 4) Rejected : 5-6 ∘ There was an opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions. • Conference submission management system: The paper is uploaded via EDAS (https://edas.info/) • Number of submissions received : 70 papers • Number of submissions sent for review : 60 papers • Number of submissions accepted : 48 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100) : 68.57 • Average number of reviews per paper : 2 • Total number of reviewers involved : 36 • Any additional info on review process (eg Plagiarism check system) : ∘ The similarity score was checked by the editors to find the plagiarism using https://www.turnitin.com/. ∘ The standard similarity score to be accepted is less than 15%. • Contact person for queries (Full name, affiliation, institutional email address) : Name : Ayodya Pradhipta Tenggara Affiliation : Universitas Gadjah Mada Email address : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/918/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 918 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Editorial Team ◽

Full Paper ◽

Double Blind ◽

Contact Person ◽

Conference Series ◽

Blind Review ◽

Galley Proof

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind The 2nd International Symposium on Arboriculture in the Tropics: Trees and Human Health (The 2nd ISATrop2021) Editorial team used a double-blind review, where both the reviewer (scientific committee) and author identities were concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. Only the editor knows the name of this reviewer and author. The list of Scientific committees has been determined before the symposium takes place and was ratified in the form of a Letter of Assignment. • Conference submission management system: The registration mechanism for the 2nd ISATrop2021 for participants, both non-presenters and oral presenters was carried out via online submission with the form provided on the arboriculture website ( https://arborikultur.ipb.ac.id/registration/ ). Abstracts for presenters are also uploaded when filling out the registration form. Speakers and participants can monitor and communicate with symposium organizers via email [email protected] and WhatsApp with contact person Ulfa Adzkia, S.Hut, M.Si as the symposium secretary (+62 822 6245 4154). Participants who have presented their papers at the 2nd ISATrop2021 on 21-22 June 2021, can then submit full papers via email [email protected] to the 2nd ISATrop2021 Editorial Team. • Number of submissions received: 62 • Number of submissions sent for review: 53 • Number of submissions accepted: 53 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 85.48% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 papers • Total number of reviewers involved: 27 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: - Full papers that have been received by the 2nd ISATrop2021 Editorial Team via email [email protected] from the participants have been going through a peer review mechanism as follows: 1. The Editor Team allocates 1-3 papers to the 2nd ISATrop2021 Scientific Committees (reviewers). 2. Each full paper along with the review form was sent to each reviewer via email [email protected]. 3. The review and revision process were continued until the full paper is declared “Accepted by No Revision” by the reviewer. 4. Full Paper that has been Accepted by Revision, then processed for plagiarism checking by TURNITIN, proofread checking by the proofreader team, and layout checking by the layout team. 5. While waiting for the proof read and layout check results, the author was asked to submit a “Statement of Originality form” via email. The form template was provided by the editor team. 6. The results of the proofread and layout in the form of “Galley Proof Draft” were then sent back to the author via email. 7. Galley Proof Draft that has been checked and corrected by the author, then sent back to the editor team via email. 8. The final layout team then rechecks the full paper to ensure that the format is in accordance with the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science format. • Contact person for queries: Name : Fifi Gus Dwiyanti Affiliation: Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/843/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 843 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Double Blind ◽

Federal Research ◽

Scientific Experts ◽

E Mail ◽

Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via e-mail [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 98 • Number of submissions sent for review: 84 • Number of submissions accepted: 65 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 66.3% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 24 • Any additional info on review process: All reviewers have academic status and are recognized scientific experts in their field. Contact person for queries: Name : Fomin Sergey Denisovich, Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Head of the NAMSI Center, Doctor of Technical Sciences Affiliation: Volgograd State Agrarian University, FEDERAL RESEARCH CENTER” NEMCHINOVKA " Email: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/778/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 778 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Similarity Index ◽

Full Paper ◽

Double Blind ◽

National Journal ◽

Blind Review ◽

Review Form ◽

Paper Submission

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: The CITIES 2020 Conference used double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. There was two process of review, such as abstract and full paper review. The conference provided review form for the reviewers to decide their recommendation. There were four decision options which is available in the review form, such as accepted with no revision, accepted with revision, resubmit and review, and decline. Therefore, there was opportunity for author to resubmit the article after revision. • Conference submission management system: The submission was divided into two period, namely abstract and full paper submission. The accepted abstracts were suggested to submit the full papers. The authors submitted their manuscript to the official email address of the CITIES Conference, it is [email protected] which was monitored daily by the team in charge in the paper division. Furthermore, the Editors of conference determined the suitable reviewers after the paper submission accepted from the paper division. During the submission, the authors should complete the registration form to indicate their preference to the publication options. The CITIES 2020 Conference provided three options of publication, such as accredited international journal, accredited national journal, and Scopus indexed proceedings journal. • Number of submissions received: 59 • Number of submissions sent for review: 59 • Number of submissions accepted: 58 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 98.3% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 12 • Any additional info on review process: The CITIES 2020 Conference provided the process of checking the similarity index of all papers submitted. The result of plagiarism check was included in the review result form which was delivered to the authors. • Contact person for queries: Name : KDM Erli Handayeni Affiliation: Urban and Regional Planning Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/884/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 884 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Academic Writing ◽

Management System ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Double Blind ◽

Web Based ◽

Blind Review ◽

Paper Submission

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: The 2nd ICHMGEP 2020 employed a double-blind review format, which means that both the reviewer and author identities were concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. The papers were reviewed by the internal (committee) and external reviewers (experts in the field). The internal reviewers ensured that the papers had conformed with the template, met the standard language, and showed satisfactory academic writing. Meanwhile, the external reviewers assessed the content of the papers. • Conference submission management system: The 2nd ICHMGEP 2020 utilized a web-based management system, where a typical web was designed to organize the conference including the paper submission and the review process. The webpage can be accessed at http://ichmgep.uny.ac.id/paper-submission. • Number of submissions received: The 2nd ICHMGEP 2020 organizers received 83 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: The 2nd ICHMGEP 2020 organizers sent 83 papers for review • Number of submissions accepted: There were 60 papers accepted for publication • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): The acceptance rate was 72,28 • Average number of reviews per paper: The average number of reviews for each paper was three reviews • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Nursida Arif, S.T., M.Sc. Affiliation: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/850/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 850 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Research Work ◽

Full Length ◽

Initial Screening ◽

Double Blind ◽

Screening Process ◽

Blind Review ◽

Institute Of Technology

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science has been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind review 1. As a first step, SESBT 2021 flyer was prepared along with the design of a dedicated website www.vitsesbt.com was launched. All necessary information related to SESBT 2021 namely About the Conference, Call for Papers, Keynote Speakers, Committee, Registration, Key Dates and Contact Information was made available in the website together with the option of sharing latest updates. Information related to call for papers were then shared with the research, academic and industrial communities through email and social media. 2. A team comprising of the guest editors and members of the organizing and technical committees screened all the received abstracts (prepared following the conference template) and shortlisted those related to the conference theme and its novelty. The team decided on the acceptance or rejection of the abstracts and the decision was communicated to the authors through our conference email [email protected] 3. Along with the acceptance email, the authors were requested to prepare their full length paper (following the conference template) and submit the same to [email protected] on or before July 6, 2021. 4. Based on the first come first serve basis, plagiarism check was carried out on the received manuscripts by the guest editors using TURNITIN software. Those manuscripts with less than 15% plagiarism alone were accepted for the initial screening process that was carried out by the same team which screened the abstracts. 5. As part of the initial screening process, every manuscript underwent a rigorous review (Review 1) to ensure novelty, good technical content, methodology, clear experimental / computational procedures and significant results. 6. The guest editors then forwarded the comments received after Review 1 to all authors with regard to either restructuring their paper or towards including more results in their work, before their first revised submission. 7. All authors were then invited to present their research work in the conference. A total of 20 parallel paper presentation sessions were scheduled and each session was chaired by 2 experts. The session chairs were provided with the RUBRICS for their evaluation. 8. Revised manuscripts after incorporating the suggestions by session chairs were sent for an elaborate review (Review 2). In order to make the review process more stringent, a separate reviewer form was designed and provided to the reviewers along with the manuscript to be reviewed. 9. The decision by the reviewers was strictly adhered and those manuscripts recommended by them alone were sent to authors requesting them to submit the final revised manuscript prepared using the IOP EES template provided to them. 10. The authors were requested to incorporate the suggestions provided by both reviewers and session chairs and then submit their final revised manuscript in 2 different files (one with the corrections highlighted and the other without highlighted). 11. The received final revised manuscripts were cross verified for incorporation of reviewer’s comments and then checked for plagiarism (less than 15%) once again. Upon successful verification, the manuscripts were finally transferred to the publisher through their FTP server on 31st August 2021. • Conference submission management system: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 124 full length papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 90 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 41 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 33.06 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 Reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 85 Reviewers • Any additional info on review process: All manuscripts after undergoing plagiarism check had been double-blind peer reviewed by two reviewers and based on their comments; the revised manuscripts were submitted by authors for final publication. • Contact persons for queries: Dr. M.B. SHYAM KUMAR & Dr. R. HARISH (CONVENERS – SESBT 2021) Dr. K. KARUNAMURTHY, Dr. M. FEROSKHAN, & Dr. N. GOBINATH (CO-CONVENERS – SESBT 2021) SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (SMEC), VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (VIT) CHENNAI, VANDALUR – KELAMBAKKAM ROAD, MELAKOTTAIYUR, CHENNAI, INDIA - 600 127. Mobile : 9444465447, 9494823730, 9884032820, 9994664044, 7200339972 Email : [email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/889/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 889 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Conference Proceeding ◽

Double Blind ◽

Blind Review ◽

Email Address ◽

Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind. The Conference Proceeding uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. The manuscripts were handled by three Editors (details as under) and the reviewers were selected based on area of expertise. The email address used for the management system is [email protected] Person in charge/details of Manuscripts handled by editors: I. Submissions handled by Dr Sandeep Singh - 123 II. Submissions handled by Dr Jasgurpreet Singh - 122 III. Submissions handled by Dr Raman Kumar - 100 • Conference submission management system: Via Easy Chair and Conference Official email address. • Number of submissions received: 345 • Number of submissions sent for review: 176 • Number of submissions accepted: 85 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): [(85/345)*100] = 24.6 • Average number of reviews per paper: 02 • Total number of reviewers involved: 44 • Any additional info on review process: NA • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Sandeep Singh Affiliation: Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer-Review Declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/869/1/011003 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 869 (1) ◽

pp. 011003

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Preliminary Review ◽

Double Blind ◽

Conference Series ◽

Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Number of submissions received: 94 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 94 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 74 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78.72% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 papers • Total number of reviewers involved: 31 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: 1. Preliminary review 2. The papers passed the first review will be reviewed again from the following aspects: originality, innovation, technical soundness, and applicability Ilham Zulfahmi Email: [email protected] Universitas Syiah Kuala

Download Full-text