scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 927 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Similarity Score ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review : Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? ∘ The review was done by considering five (5) aspects : 1) Relevance with topics 2) Novelty and originality 3) Clarity 4) Systematic 5) Analysis techniques and deduction ∘ One reviewer gave points on each aspect between 1-4. Based on total points from those four aspects : 1) Definitely Accept : 16-20 2) Accept : 11-15 3) Possibly Accept : 7-10 4) Rejected : 5-6 ∘ There was an opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions. • Conference submission management system: The paper is uploaded via EDAS (https://edas.info/) • Number of submissions received : 70 papers • Number of submissions sent for review : 60 papers • Number of submissions accepted : 48 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100) : 68.57 • Average number of reviews per paper : 2 • Total number of reviewers involved : 36 • Any additional info on review process (eg Plagiarism check system) : ∘ The similarity score was checked by the editors to find the plagiarism using https://www.turnitin.com/. ∘ The standard similarity score to be accepted is less than 15%. • Contact person for queries (Full name, affiliation, institutional email address) : Name : Ayodya Pradhipta Tenggara Affiliation : Universitas Gadjah Mada Email address : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form

2021 ◽  
Vol 2091 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Trapeznikov Institute ◽  
Check System ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Reviewers used following criteria when accepting/declining papers: scientific merit (notably scientific rigour, accuracy and correctness); clarity of expression; communication of ideas; readability and discussion of concepts; sufficient discussion of the context of the work, and suitable referencing; originality; motivation; repetition, length of paper; presentation criteria (title, abstract, diagrams, figures, tables and captions, text and mathematics; conclusion) • Conference submission management system: https://uconfy.com/ • Number of submissions received: 146 • Number of submissions sent for review: 146 • Number of submissions accepted: 78 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78/146=0.53 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 • Any additional info on review process: Plagiarism check system was used • Contact person for queries (Full name, affiliation, institutional email address) Vladimir Vishnevsky, V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 Profsoyuznaya street, Moscow 117997, Russia, [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2090 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Management ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? • Conference submission management system: IDAS Conference management System • Number of submissions received: 336 • Number of submissions sent for review: 315 • Number of submissions accepted: 189 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 56.25% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: more than 600 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): We use Turnitin system for plagiarism checking • Contact person for queries: Dimitrios Vlachos Associate Professor, University of Peloponnese Email: [email protected] Tel: +30 6944 371526

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 888 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: via email [email protected], managed by Indri Juliyarsi, Robi Amizar, Sri Melia, and Ade Sukma • Number of submissions received: 162 • Number of submissions sent for review: 113 • Number of submissions accepted: 85 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52,47 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 18 • Any additional info on review process: proofread and turnitin • Contact person for queries: Name: Dr. Indri Juliyarsi Affiliation: Universitas Andalas Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 926 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
Minor Revision ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Table 1 shows the evaluation aspects in the review process at The 3rd ICoGEE 2021. Several essential things in scientific articles are reviewed through this evaluation aspect, such as novelty, originality, clarity of methods and analysis, and their significance in science and technology. If an evaluation aspect has less than good quality, the reviewer provides suggestions for improvement, and the author must improve it or provide feedback. The reviewer will also offer recommendations such as: (i) accept without revision (if all aspects of the evaluation have exceptional score), (ii) accept with minor revision (if there are less than two evaluation aspects whose quality is below good), (iii) accept with major revision (if there are about 2 - 4 evaluation aspects that are below good quality), and (iv) reject (if more than four evaluation aspects have below good quality or are considered not to meet the essential requirements of scientific articles). • Conference submission management system: For official The 3rd ICoGEE 2021 webpage, we used: http://icogee.org, while for paper management system, we used Easy Chair: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=icogee2021 • Number of submissions received: 197 • Number of submissions sent for review: 197 • Number of submissions accepted: 114 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 57,86% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 41 • Any additional info on review process: All papers had undergone plagiarism check (using Turnitin) and single-blind review by two reviewers • Contact person for queries: Name : Yuant Tiandho Affiliation : Department of Physics, Universitas Bangka Belitung Email : [email protected] / [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 911 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Online Submission ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (We adopt this system to allow the reviewers to know who the authors are, but the author do not know who the reviewers are) • Conference submission management system: Via online submission through ICFST official website as follow: https://icfst2021.com/submit-paper/ • Number of submissions received: 114 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 114 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 89 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): Accepted: 78 %, Rejected : 22% • Average number of reviews per paper: 10-12 papers per reviewer • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: Review started on August to September 2021 • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Muhammad Aqil Affiliation: Indonesian Cereals Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia Email : [email protected]; [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 908 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via Conference e-mail: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 63 • Number of submissions accepted: 42 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 64.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 19 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper took 2 weeks for revisions after review; 2 rounds of the review process were applied. Contact person for queries: Name : Oleg A. Anenkhonov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.) Affiliation: Institute of General and Experimental Biology SB RAS Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 958 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Data Interpretation ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Full Paper ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? • International reviewers need to provide excellent feedback on the submitted articles after carefully analyzing merits of the paper with regards to scope, applications, research methodology, experimental techniques, data interpretation and grammar. • Authors were asked to revise their original manuscripts in alignment with the reviewers’ comments and suggestions for publication. • An opportunity will be given to the authors to resubmit their manuscripts after revisions. • Conference submission management system: http://www.academicconf.com/Identity/Account/Login?confName=wre2021 • Number of submissions received: 138 full paper submissions and 262 abstract submissions • Number of submissions sent for review: 78 full paper submissions • Number of submissions accepted: 25 full paper submissions • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 32.05%. • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: about 150 reviewers, please check http://paper.academicconf.com/reviewers.aspx?confname=wre2021 • Any additional info on review process: We used Ithenticate to check the plagiarism issue during the review process • Contact person for queries: Prof. Dr. Chih-Huang Weng I-Shou University, Taiwan [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 877 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Reviewers of ICOREMT-2021 considered the following vital points in the assessment process: A- Technical Criteria (such as scientific merits and adequacy of discussion) B- Quality Criteria (such as the scientific interest of the results and the ratio of length and importance of the idea) C- Presentation Criteria (quality of figures/tables and conclusions) One opportunity was given to the authors to address reviewers’ comments and corrections. • Conference submission management system: Direct submission via official email address. • Number of submissions received: 272 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 250 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 56 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 20.59% • The average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 203 reviewers • Any additional info on the review process (i.e. plagiarism check system): All papers were checked using Turnitin software; papers with a more than 20% similarity percentage were rejected without review. The reviewers checked the quality of the submitted papers, including the contribution to the knowledge, the importance of the idea, adequacy of discussion, quality of figures and tables, and the conclusions. After the reviewing process, one opportunity was given to the authors to address reviewers’ comments and corrections. • Contact person for queries: Dr Khalid Hashim, Liverpool John Moores University, UK Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 899 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Open University ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single blind and also the Chair of the conference reviewed all submitted articles. • Conference submission management system: Easy Chair and by email [email protected] (Efthimios Zervas was in charge) • Number of submissions received: 139 • Number of submissions sent for review: 139 • Number of submissions accepted: 79 for papers and 20 for posters • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 56.83% for the papers only and 71.22% for the papers and posters. • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 17 + the Chair of the Conference • Any additional info on review process: All accepted works are reviewed twice, abstract and full text. All works with a score lower than <2.5 were rejected and all works with a score between 2.5 and 3 were accepted as posters (except for the works initially declared as posters). • Contact person for queries: Name : Efthimios Zervas Affiliation: Hellenic Open University Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 923 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Agricultural Science ◽  
Scientific Creativity ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) • The peer review of all research at the Second International Conference for Agricultural Science (ICFAS 2021) was double-blind, and every reviewer responsible for two research. • Conference submission management system: • A temporary account was used in the open conference system (OCS), for pkp company with help from University of Al-Muthanna. • Number of submissions received: 122 submissions received • Number of submissions sent for review: only 90 research sent for reviewers because 32 research did not comply with the conference instructions in terms of scientific creativity or scientific plagrisim less than 20%. • Number of submissions accepted: 90 research was accepted only. • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): Acceptance Rate equal (73.77 %) • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews for each paper. • Total number of reviewers involved: 45 reviewers. • Any additional info on review process: The reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript. Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed Affiliation: University of Al-Qadisiyah Email : [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document