The fungal literature-based occurrence database for southern West Siberia (Russia)

The paper presents the initiative on literature-based occurrence data mobilisation of fungi and fungi-related organisms (literature-based occurrences, Darwin Core MaterialCitation) to develop the Fungal literature-based occurrence database for the southern West Siberia (FuSWS). The initiative on mobilisation of literature-based occurrence data started in the northern part of West Siberia in 2016. The present project extends the initiative to the southern regions and includes ten administrative territories (Tyumen Region, Sverdlovsk Region, Chelyabinsk Region, Omsk Region, Kurgan Region, Tomsk Region, Novosibirsk Region, Kemerovo Region, Altai Territory and Republic of Altai). The area occupies the central to southern part of the West Siberian Plain and extends for about 1.5 K km from the west to the east from the eastern slopes of the Ural Mountains to Yenisey River and from north to south—about 1.3 K km. The total area equals about 1.4 million km2. The initiative is actively growing in spatial, collaboration and data accumulation terms. The working group of about 30 mycologists from eight organisations dedicated to the data mobilisation was created as part of the Siberian Mycological Society (informal organisation since 2019). They have compiled the almost complete bibliographic list of mycology-related papers for the southern West Siberia, including over 900 publications for the last two centuries (the earliest dated 1800). All literature sources were digitised and an online library was created to integrate bibliography metadata and digitised papers using Zotero bibliography manager. The analysis of published sources showed that about two-thirds of works contain occurrences of fungi for the scope of mobilisation. At the time of the paper submission, the database had been populated with a total of about 8 K records from 93 sources. The dataset is uploaded to GBIF, where it is available for online search of species occurrences and/or download. The project's page with the introduction, templates, bibliography list, video-presentations and written instructions is available (in Russian) at the web site of the Siberian Mycological Society. The initiative will be continued in the following years to extract the records from all published sources. The paper presents the first project with the aim of literature-based occurrence data mobilisation of fungi and fungi-related organisms in the southern West Siberia. The full bibliography and a digital library of all regional mycological publications created for the first time includes about 900 published works. By the time of paper submission, nearly 8 K occurrence records were extracted from about 90 literature sources and integrated into the FuSWS database published in GBIF.

Peer Review Declaration

Type of peer review Single – blind Criteria of accepting / declining paper All accepted papers must meet the following criteria: 1. The topic is in the coverage topics of the conference 2. The paper is an original work and has not been published 3. Pass the plagiarism test 4. The paper is written in a good English 5. Follow the proceeding format The editorial board gave an opportunity to resubmit as long as the paper met points (1), (2) and (3) of the acceptance criteria Conference submission system All abstract and papers were submitted to the conference editorial board using the conference submission system: http://icpeu.teknik.ub.ac.id/final-paper-submission/ Number of submissions received 84 papers Number of submissions sent for review 84 papers Number of submissions accepted 70 (36 papers were selected for publications in IOP - EES) Acceptance Rate (%) 83.3% Average number of reviews per paper 5 reviews per paper including 3 reviews for the content and 2 reviews for paper format Total number of reviewers involved 3 persons as follows: • Johanes Parlindungan, ST., MT, PhD (PIC) • Imma Widyawati Agustin, ST., MT., Ph.D • Dr. Techn. Christia Mediana, ST., M.Eng Any additional info on review process The conference editorial board applied two addition checks: • Plagiarism check using www.grammarly.com • Language / grammatical check done by a professional proofreader Contact person for queries: Johannes Parlindungan, ST., MT, PhD Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Universitas Brawijaya E-mail: [email protected]

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-anonymous: authors’ identities are known to the reviewers; reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors. • Conference submission management system: The paper submission management system is carried out online via the https://ocs.usu.ac.id/ICONART/iconart2021 page. The author must register first and then log in to upload the manuscript via that page. • Number of submissions received: The total number of submissions was 136 papers. • Number of submissions sent for review: For reviewing processes, only 106 papers (77.9%) were reviewed and the rest (30 papers) were rejected because of the low quality. • Number of submissions accepted: The number of accepted papers was 106 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): The Acceptance Rate was 77.9% • Average number of reviews per paper: The average number of reviews is two revisions per paper • Total number of reviewers involved: The total number of reviewers involved was 17 reviewers, consisted of experts, professionals, and scientific committees who fulfil expected standards of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Any additional info on review process: The criteria in accepting papers were based on conference topic suitability, data precision, systematics of English writing, and similarity check results using Turnitin (less than 25%). • Contact person for queries: Name : Prof. Mohammad Basyuni, Ph.D Affiliation: Universitas Sumatera Utara Email : [email protected]/[email protected]

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: The 2nd ICHMGEP 2020 employed a double-blind review format, which means that both the reviewer and author identities were concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. The papers were reviewed by the internal (committee) and external reviewers (experts in the field). The internal reviewers ensured that the papers had conformed with the template, met the standard language, and showed satisfactory academic writing. Meanwhile, the external reviewers assessed the content of the papers. • Conference submission management system: The 2nd ICHMGEP 2020 utilized a web-based management system, where a typical web was designed to organize the conference including the paper submission and the review process. The webpage can be accessed at http://ichmgep.uny.ac.id/paper-submission. • Number of submissions received: The 2nd ICHMGEP 2020 organizers received 83 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: The 2nd ICHMGEP 2020 organizers sent 83 papers for review • Number of submissions accepted: There were 60 papers accepted for publication • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): The acceptance rate was 72,28 • Average number of reviews per paper: The average number of reviews for each paper was three reviews • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Nursida Arif, S.T., M.Sc. Affiliation: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Email : [email protected]

Peer Review Declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administrated by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standard expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing • Type of peer review : Single-blind • Conference submission management system : Konfrenzi (Conference Management System) • Number of submissions received 152 • Number of submissions sent for review 102 • Number of submission accepted 91 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 59.86 % • Average number of review per paper 2 • Total number of reviewers involved 20 • Any additional info on review process: Review Timeline: 1. The manuscripts sent to the guest editors for initial checking, including format, similarity, and language quality. 1st round = Abstract paper submission : 1th June - 14th June 2021 Abstract acceptance notification : 17th June 2021 Full paper submission : 21th June - 10th July 2021 Payment : 11th August - 16th August 2021 2st round = Abstract paper submission : 15th June - 12th July 2021 Abstract acceptance notification : 15th July 2021 Full paper submission : 19th July - 1st August 2021 Payment : 30th August - 5th September 2021 2. The manuscripts which is accepted by the editors, were sent to the reviewer for substantial evaluation. Among 102 manuscripts that were reviewed, 91 manuscripts were accepted for submitting to IOP EES. The manuscripts were sent back to the authors 1st round = Review result notification : 22th July 2021 2st round = Review result notification : 14th August 2021 3. The authors sent the manuscripts for confirming the revisions to the guest editor 1st round = Revised paper submission : 26th July - 09th August 2021 2st round = Revised paper submission : 17th August - 28th August 2021 4. The guest editor asked the authors for signing the transfer agreement and answering the editorial comment (if any) Authors transfer agreement : 20th September 2021 - 27th September 2021 5. The guest editor performed layout format, similarity, and language check. Second check : 27th September 2021 - 8th October 2021 6. The manuscripts were transferred to IOP EES IOP transfer : 9th October 2021 • Contact person for queries: Bimastyaji Surya Ramadan ([email protected]) Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro

German Medical Data Sciences in Studies in Health Technology and Informatics – Reflections on the Fifth Volume

Since 2017, the German Society for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology e.V. (GMDS) offers the submission of full papers to the annual meetings, optional in Studies in Health Technologies and Informatics (Stud HIT) or in GMS Medical Informatics, Biometrics, and Epidemiology (MIBE). GMDS’ aim is to increase the attractiveness of the conference and paper submission process in particular for young scientists and to increase the visibility of the conference. A standardized peer review process was established. Since 2017, a 25–35% of the contributions have been submitted as full papers. A total of 177 papers were published in Stud HTI. With an unofficial journal impact factor of 1.088 (2019) and 0.540 (2020), the papers were cited with a frequency similarly to national medical journals or full paper contributions of International medical informatics conferences.

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: The CITIES 2020 Conference used double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. There was two process of review, such as abstract and full paper review. The conference provided review form for the reviewers to decide their recommendation. There were four decision options which is available in the review form, such as accepted with no revision, accepted with revision, resubmit and review, and decline. Therefore, there was opportunity for author to resubmit the article after revision. • Conference submission management system: The submission was divided into two period, namely abstract and full paper submission. The accepted abstracts were suggested to submit the full papers. The authors submitted their manuscript to the official email address of the CITIES Conference, it is [email protected] which was monitored daily by the team in charge in the paper division. Furthermore, the Editors of conference determined the suitable reviewers after the paper submission accepted from the paper division. During the submission, the authors should complete the registration form to indicate their preference to the publication options. The CITIES 2020 Conference provided three options of publication, such as accredited international journal, accredited national journal, and Scopus indexed proceedings journal. • Number of submissions received: 59 • Number of submissions sent for review: 59 • Number of submissions accepted: 58 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 98.3% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 12 • Any additional info on review process: The CITIES 2020 Conference provided the process of checking the similarity index of all papers submitted. The result of plagiarism check was included in the review result form which was delivered to the authors. • Contact person for queries: Name : KDM Erli Handayeni Affiliation: Urban and Regional Planning Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia Email : [email protected]

RYANSQL: Recursively Applying Sketch-based Slot Fillings for Complex Text-to-SQL in Cross-Domain Databases

Text-to-SQL is the problem of converting a user question into an SQL query, when the question and database are given. In this paper, we present a neural network approach called RYANSQL (Recursively Yielding Annotation Network for SQL) to solve complex Text-to-SQL tasks for cross-domain databases. Statement Position Code (SPC) is defined to transform a nested SQL query into a set of non-nested SELECT statements; a sketch-based slot filling approach is proposed to synthesize each SELECT statement for its corresponding SPC. Additionally, two input manipulation methods are presented to improve generation performance further. RYANSQL achieved competitive result of 58.2% accuracy on the challenging Spider benchmark. At the time of paper submission (April 2020), RYANSQL v2, a variant of original RYANSQL, is positioned at 3rd place among all systems and 1st place among the systems not using database content with 60.6% exact matching accuracy. The source code is available at https://github.com/kakaoenterprise/RYANSQL.