Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Each submission is anonymously reviewed by an average of three independent reviewers, to ensure the final high standard and quality of each accepted submission. • Conference submission management system: Online submission • Number of submissions received: 75 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 75 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 52 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 69% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviews per paper • Total number of reviewers involved: 40 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: We developed the strict peer review procedures and invite relevant experts to serve as editors in order to control the quality of the papers. First, all articles will be subjected to peer review administered by editors. Then, reviews will be conducted by expert referees, who have been requested to provide unbiased and constructive comments aimed, whenever possible, at improving the work. Final, editors will take all reasonable steps to ensure the quality of the materials they publish and their decision to accept or reject a paper for publication will be based only on the merits of the work and the relevance to the conference theme. The following criteria will be considered by the editors and referees in their evaluation: (1) Is the subject matter within the scope of the conference? (2) Does the paper contain enough original results to warrant publication? (3) Is the paper technically sound and free of errors? (4) Is the work clearly and concisely presented? Is it well organized? (5) Does the title clearly and sufficiently reflect its con tents? (6) Is the abstract informative? Are the main results and conclusions mentioned? (7) Are the illustrations of adequate quality, relevant and understandable? (8) Does the bibliography give a clear view of the current state-of-the-art in the domain? (9) Is the quality of the language satisfactory? • Contact person for queries: Name : Guosong Jiang Affiliation: Huanggang Normal University Email : [email protected]

Peer review declaration

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (We adopt this system to allow the reviewers to know who the authors are, but the author do not know who the reviewers are) • Conference submission management system: Via online submission through ICFST official website as follow: https://icfst2021.com/submit-paper/ • Number of submissions received: 114 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 114 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 89 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): Accepted: 78 %, Rejected : 22% • Average number of reviews per paper: 10-12 papers per reviewer • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: Review started on August to September 2021 • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Muhammad Aqil Affiliation: Indonesian Cereals Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia Email : [email protected]; [email protected]

Peer review declaration

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind The review process for ICMScE 2021 is Single Blind. Participants’ articles are sent to reviewers automatically through the conference management system (CMS) according to their expertise. Reviewers provide suggestions to the author through the comments column on the CMS. • Conference submission management system: Online submission management system (http://science.conference.upi.edu/icmsce2021/registration-submission/) • Number of submissions received: 540 received • Number of submissions sent for review: 451 sent for review • Number of submissions accepted: 144 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): (144/451) x 100 = 31,93% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 times • Total number of reviewers involved: 20 reviewers and 10 editors • Any additional info on review process: The review process is conducted in 4 stages: 1. Abstract review by the editor 2. Full paper review by the reviewer 3. Second review by the reviewer 4. Similarity check by the editor 5. Layout review by the editor • Contact person for queries (please include: name, affiliation, institutional email address) Dr. Achmad Samsudin +6285225709383 [email protected] Department of Physics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No. 229, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia

UPAYA PENDAMPINGAN MENULIS DAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH PENELITIAN TINDAKAN KELAS BAGI GURU SMK DI PENAJAM PASER UTARA

Artikel ini mendeskripsikan upaya peningkatan kemampuan menulis dan teknis publikasi bagi guru SMK di Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara (PPU) Kalimantan Timur. Upaya ini dilatar belakangi oleh minimnya kemampuan dan waktu guru SMK dalam menghasilkan karya ilmiah. Indikator pentingnya adalah banyak guru- guru yang terhambat naik pangkatnya karena tidak mampu menghasilkan karya ilmiah. Upaya tersebut dilakukan melalui bimbingan dan pendampingan untuk menghasilkan karya ilmiah Penelitian Tindakan Kelals (PTK) dan mempublikasikannya di media publikasi jurnal atau semiar yang relevan. Pendampingan secara teknis juga dilakukan dalam melakukan online submission di sistem jurnal online OJS. Partisipan yang terlibat dalam upaya ini adalah guru SMK 2 di kab PPU. Program ini direncanakan melalui 3 tahapan kegiatan : (i) pelatihan penyusunan karya ilmiah guru, (ii) bimbingan teknis sistem sitasi dan referensi karya ilmiah; (iii) bimbingan teknis sistem submit OJS journal. Tahapan tersebut dilaksanakan dalam kurun waktu 3 bulan. Capaian yang dihasilkan dari kegiatan ini adalah (1) peningkatan motivasi menulis, (2) mitra memiliki kemampuan teknis publikasi di jurnal OJS, (3) dihasilkan draft karya tulis dibidang Penelitian Tindakan Kelals (PTK). Kegiatan pendampingan penulisan dan publikasi artikel PTK secara subjektif-kualitatif dapat meningkatkan motivasi guru dalam melaksanakan PTK. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari draft awal yang dihasilkan sebanyak 12 draft, dan akhirnya tersaring sebanyak 4 draft yang siap terbit di jurnal nasional.

Persepsi Masyarakat Magersaren terhadap Kelestarian Hutan di UB Forest

About JEPA Editorial Board Aim and Scope Publication Ethics Reviewer Acknowledgement Website Statistic User You are logged in as... mahfudlotulula My Profile Log Out Article Tools Print this article Indexing metadata How to cite item Finding References Journal Content Search Search Scope Browse By Issue By Author By Title Information For Readers For Authors For Librarians Information for Author Author Guidelines Online Submission Guidelines Index Google Scholar Search logo Crossref Metadata Search RESEARCHBIB Index Search BASE Metadata Search DRJI Index Search PKP Index Search PKP Index Search Onesearch Metadata Search Citeulike Index Search Citeulike Index Search CiteFactor Index Search Sinta Index Search Garuda Index Search Garuda Index Search Tools Mendeley Metadata Search logo Turnitin Metadata Search logo Zotero Metadata Search logo Keywords Agroindustri Benih sawi non-sertifikat, Motivasi, Pendapatan Ekspor Kakao Karakteristik, adopsi, kemitraan Kerjasama perdagangan, depresiasi Rupiah, ekspor, minyak sawit Ketimpangan Pendapatan, Kemiskinan Kinerja Pemasaran Lingkungan Kerja, Motivasi, Kebun Pembangunan Kependudukan, Pemberdayaan, Modal Manusia, Kewirausahaan Pembiayaan Strategi, Kemiskinan UMKM ]Persedian Optimal, Keuntungan, Penggiligan beras karakteristik, wirausaha, petani, sukses, agrowisata karet alam, threshold, transmisi harga, TVECM kelembagaan, tingkat Partisipasi model, ekonomi, usaha ayam lokal, terintegrasi, di peternak padi organik, pendapatan, Pringkasap, R/C rasio, struktur biaya rantai pasok sistem bagi hasil, petani penggarap, regresi logistik. Persepsi Masyarakat Magersaren terhadap Kelestarian Hutan di UB Forest Mas Ayu Ambayoen, Alia Fibrianingtyas, Sugeng Riyanto Abstract Hutan yang lestari adalah sebuah hutan yang mampu menjalankan fungsi-fungsinya, baik sebagai fungsi konservasi, fungsi lindung dan fungsi produksi. Persepsi yang belum setara antara masyarakat sekitar UB Forest dengan tujuan dan fungsi utama hutan akan menghambat terciptanya sinergi dalam pengelolaan kelestariannya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk: (1) Mendeskripsikan pengelolaan Hutan Penelitian dan Pendidikan di UB Forest; (2) Mengidentifikasi persepsi masyarakat sekitar hutan terhadap fungsi dan manfaat hutan di UB Forest; serta (3) Menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi persepsi masyarakat tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan indepth interview kepada key informan dan informan pada masyarakat Magersaren Sumbersari dan Sumberwangi Kecamatan Karangploso, Kabupaten Malang. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis data kualitatif model Miles dan Huberman, serta keabsahan data menggunakan triangulasi. Pengelolaan Hutan Penelitian dan Pendidikan di UB Forest diarahkan menjadi hutan lindung dan produksi. Pengelolaan ini didasari sebuah Master Plan UB Forest yang mencakup aspek bio-fisik, sosial-ekonomi-budaya (sosekbud), aspek pendidikan, dan aspek lingkungan. Persepsi masyarakat sekitar hutan terhadap fungsi hutan dan manfaatnya dapat diidentifikasi berdasarkan: persepsi terkait fungsi UB Forest; persepsi terkait komoditas tanaman; serta persepsi terkait sumber air

NreASAM: Towards an Ontology-Based Model for Authentication and Auto-Grading Online Submission of Psychomotor Assessments

Core and integral to the fourth industrial revolution, knowledge economy, and beyond is information and communication technology (ICT); more so, during and post the novel coronavirus pandemic. Yet, there exists a skills gap in ICT networking and networks engineering. Not only do students perceive ICT networking to be difficult to comprehend, lecturers and institutions grapple with the adequacy of ICT networking equipment. Real-life simulators, like the Cisco Packet Tracer, hold the promise of alternate teaching opportunities and evidenced-based environments for (higher-order) assessment. Research in the last decade on ontology for assessments have focused on taxonomy and multiple-choice questions and auto-generation and marking of assessments. This chapter extends the body of knowledge through its ontology-based model for enabling and auto-assessing performance-based and/or pseudo-psychomotor assessment. The auto-grading online submission system assists with authenticity and enables authentic and/or sustainable assessments.

Project Reporting Management System with AI based Assistive Features for Text Summarization

This paper details a proof-of-concept system called Project Reporting Management System (PRMS) to manage the project reporting process in a typical research centre where the process can be manual for many centres. In fact, it is general enough to be scaled up and deployed for a large department or scaled down for a smaller setup in any organization which needs a simple and efficient project progress reporting system but does not entail the kind of complexity and cost of commercial project management systems. Using a research centre scenario, the progress of the individual projects has to be tracked through the periodic submission of progress reports by the Principal Investigator (PI) of the project. The centre will need to consolidate these individual reports manually into a consolidated report and an executive summary for higher management. PRMS automates the tracking of individual projects and reporting deadlines, sends reminders and allows online submission of reports by the PIs. PRMS also incorporates assistive and automated features exploiting Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to generate the consolidated report and rank sentences of verbose report for assistive text summarization to facilitate the manual process of producing an executive summary.