scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1199 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Review Form ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe) MMS 2021 review form If you cannot review this manuscript within 2 weeks, please return it immediately without comments. If you answer on any question "No, see comments" fill your comment at the end of review form. Thank you for your assistance! 1. Is the topic of the manuscript relevant, timely and of interest to the audience of this conference?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 2. Does the title of the article accurately reflect its content?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 3. Is the research methodology and treatment of the study appropriate and applied properly?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 4. Is the length of the paper appropriate to the content?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 5. Do the used notation and nomenclature meet the standards determined in the area of paper interest?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 6. Is this paper clearly and concisely written and well organized?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 7. Does the manuscript contain sufficient and appropriate references?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 8. Are tables and figures appropriate and adequate?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 9. Does the abstract of article satisfactorily show the aims, methods and result of the article?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 10. Does the conclusion clearly summarize the main results and contributions of the manuscript?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 11. Is the language and presentation clear to readers familiar with the field?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 12. Comments: • Conference submission management system: https://www.mmsconf.eu/index.php/mms/mms2021 Open Conference System https://pkp.sfu.ca/ocs/ • Number of submissions received: 143 • Number of submissions sent for review: 130 • Number of submissions accepted: 105 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): (105/143)x100=73% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews per paper • Total number of reviewers involved: 70 • Any additional info on review process:- • Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Eng. MSc. Lucia Knapčíková, Ph.D. Email: [email protected] Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement. The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) All submitted papers will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, who are encouraged to give constructive comments and suggestions to the authors. The review is single-blind – the author doesn’t know the names of the reviewers assigned to the review of the paper. The authors of submitted papers will receive the review comments and recommendations and will have a possibility to amend their papers based on the review comments and suggestions and upload the revised versions. If both reviewers indicate that the paper can’t be published then it will not be accepted for publication, however, the talk might be delivered at the Conference if the reviewers specify that in the review. The publication of the papers in the Conference Proceedings is possible only in case the talk is presented at the Conference. • Conference submission management system: - Self-made submission management system • Number of submissions received: Number of full papers submitted for publication in IOP Conference Proceedings - 232 • Number of submissions sent for review: 232 • Number of submissions accepted: 172 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 74.13% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.9 • Total number of reviewers involved: 48 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Anastasia Kaptsova Affiliation:ITMO University, Russia Email :[email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2080 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Green Technology ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) • Conference submission management system: Google Drive: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSddb-Z5gjUh3mRRLV0voq9jtoy-SxJV7-n9Wdpb5c1WVDlUag/viewform • Number of submissions received: 38 • Number of submissions sent for review: 34 • Number of submissions accepted: 32 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 34/38 X 100: 84.2 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 37 • Any additional info on the review process:- • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Nazeri Affiliation: Center of Excellence Geopolymer & Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2097 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe) Double-blind: While receiving a new submission, we/our editors firstly check the scope of it whether suitable for our conference. If not, it will be rejected directly. If yes, it will be sent out to check plagiarism and then peer review. We choose 2 reviewers for each of the submission and after getting the two reviews, we conclude a final result for the paper. Once the two reviews show totally different attitudes, we will find another reviewer for it until we get the final result. • Conference submission management system: Through our email system Email: [email protected] In charge: Terasa Lei • Number of submissions received: 58 • Number of submissions sent for review: 49 (papers out of topic or plagiaristic were rejected directly) • Number of submissions accepted: 28 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 48.28% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2-3 • Total number of reviewers involved: About 35 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Terasa Lei Affiliation: Hubei Zhongke Institute of Geology and Environment Technology Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2053 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Conference Management ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) - All the review process was done single-blind through Microsoft CMT platform. Average three reviewers involved for each paper. In the CMT system, we provide each reviewer with a Review Questions form. • Conference submission management system: - Microsoft Conference Management Toolkit (CMT) • Number of submissions received: 36 • Number of submissions sent for review: 36 • Number of submissions accepted: 26 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 72.2 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 53 • Any additional info on review process: No • Contact person for queries: Name : Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Shamsul Sarip Affiliation: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email :[email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 936 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Check System ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-anonymous: authors' identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers' identities are hidden from authors Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s) Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Some criteria when accepting/declining paper were including: (1). The depth of the research methods and results, (2). Whether the papers were written properly, (3). If the topics of the research matches our conference, (4). All the figures were correlated to the discussion. Time given to authors in resubmitting after revisions was approximately 1 month. • Conference submission management system: We use Easychair.org platform in managing our conference submission. Submissions were available for 2.5 months prior to conference date. We generally accepted all the papers submitted for presentation in the conference as long as they suit the theme. After conference, the review process was conducted by Reviewers. • Number of submissions received: 53 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 53 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 43 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 85% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 reviewers • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): • Contact person for queries: Mohammad Rohmaneo Darminto [email protected]/[email protected] Laboratory of Geoinformatics Department of Geomatics Engineering Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement. The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2064 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The Conference submission management system assumed interaction through the Conference website (https://gdp2021.uran.ru/) and the Conference e-mail box ([email protected]). • Number of submissions received: 140 • Number of submissions sent for review: 140 • Number of submissions accepted: 132 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 94 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 15 • Any additional info on review process: There is no any additional info on review process. • Contact person for queries: Name : Nikolay Zubarev Affiliation: Institute of Electrophysics, UB RAS, 620016, Ekaterinburg, Russia [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2062 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Communication Engineering ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will publish the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Easy Chair • Number of submissions received: 97 • Number of submissions sent for review: 73 • Number of submissions accepted: 38 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 39.17% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 51 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Nishu Gupta Affiliation: Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 911 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Online Submission ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (We adopt this system to allow the reviewers to know who the authors are, but the author do not know who the reviewers are) • Conference submission management system: Via online submission through ICFST official website as follow: https://icfst2021.com/submit-paper/ • Number of submissions received: 114 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 114 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 89 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): Accepted: 78 %, Rejected : 22% • Average number of reviews per paper: 10-12 papers per reviewer • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: Review started on August to September 2021 • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Muhammad Aqil Affiliation: Indonesian Cereals Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia Email : [email protected]; [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2119 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Kutateladze Institute ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) The review process STS-37 papers was conducted by a single-blind process. It is means that only reviewers know the identity of authors, but the authors do not know who is reviewer. • Conference submission management system: All the submission and communication to all the STS-37 authors we did through conference email ([email protected]) • Number of submissions received: 180 • Number of submissions sent for review: 180 • Number of submissions accepted: 174 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 96 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 28 • Any additional info on review process: The papers which were recommended by the organizing committee of STS-37 were proposed for reviewing and publication in the volume for STS-37 conference. • Contact person for queries: Name : PhD Cheverda Vyacheslav Vladimirovich Affiliation: Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Email : [email protected].

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2104 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Review System ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
Content Review ◽  
Single Blind

All conference organizers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) The SNPF 2021 article review process was carried out using a single-blind review system. The number of papers submitted was 84 articles. The number of SNPF 2021 reviewers is 14 people. One reviewer reviewed one article. The review process was done via email and or OCS. The article review results were returned to the authors for revision within a certain period of time. The author sent the revised results, and the plagiarism checked results of the article. The editor then rechecked the revision result. If suitable, it would be forwarded to the editor, either for plagiarism, language, or template. • Conference submission management system: OCS (http://snpfmotogpe.ulm.ac.id/ocs/index.php/snpf/2021) • The number of submissions received: There were 84 articles submitted to SNPF 2021 • The number of submissions sent for review: There were 84 articles reviewed by reviewers of SNPF 2021. • The number of submissions accepted: There were 40 articles accepted for recommendation/publication to JPCS IOP Publishing. • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 47,61% • The average number of reviews per paper: One article was reviewed four times: content review 2x, language review 1x, and template review 1x. • The total number of reviewers involved: There were 14 reviewers (content review), 10 editors (content and template review), and 4 people (language review) • Any additional info on the review process: The author sent the revised article along with the similarity check (maximum 20%). A similarity check was also carried out using Turnitin (maximum 20%) when an article was declared fit for publication. So, the similarity check was done two times. • Contact person for queries: +628975586104 (Misbah) Universitas Lambung Mangkurat [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document