The Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v United States Patent and Trademark Office and Myriad Genetics, Inc, et al. (2010-1406)

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 733-764 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-417
Author(s):  
Emanuela Gambini

In June 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al., holding that “a naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring”.This case note gives an overview of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision, which is focused on the product of nature doctrine, and discusses its implications for the implementation of the criterion of isolation to DNA sequences and the United States Patent and Trademark Office's long-standing practice of granting patents on isolated DNA sequences (author's headnote).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document