Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Costs of Percutaneous Occlusive Balloon Catheter-Assisted Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Large Impacted Proximal Ureteral Calculi: A Prospective, Randomized Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1064-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiyong Qi ◽  
Yanni Li ◽  
Xu Liu ◽  
Changwen Zhang ◽  
Hongtuan Zhang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
LvWen zhang ◽  
Yan Song ◽  
Xiang Fei

Abstract This study investigated the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi. A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, complication rate and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm. Compared with the other two groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had higher stone-free rate at 3–5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively ( P < 0.05); however, there were no differences in postoperative complications.( P > 0.05). In conclusion, the novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases; however the complication and cost was not increased.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noritaka Ozawa ◽  
Ichiro Yasuda ◽  
Shinpei Doi ◽  
Takuji Iwashita ◽  
Masahito Shimizu ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwin Chatwani ◽  
Mark Martens ◽  
David A. Grimes ◽  
Molly Chatterjee ◽  
Melvin Noah ◽  
...  

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of cefmetazole given by IV push with that of parenterally administered cefoxitin for the treatment of endometritis following cesarean delivery.Methods: In a single-blind, multicenter, prospective, randomized study, 355 patients with endometritis after cesarean delivery were enrolled and received medication. Administered was either cefmetazole sodium, 2 g by IV push over 1 min q 8 h, or cefoxitin sodium, 2 g IV q 6 h in a 2:1 ratio. The patients were followed for clinical responses and side effects.Results: The cure rate for cefmetazole was 89% and for cefoxitin it was 79% (P = 0.006). The adverse events were similar in both groups.Conclusions: Cefmetazole was significantly more effective than cefoxitin in the treatment of endometritis following cesarean delivery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document