The Effect of Serious Games for Nursing Students in Clinical Decision-Making Process: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afra Calik ◽  
Sevgisun Kapucu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Serious Games ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized, controlled trial of the role of weaning predictors in clinical decision making*

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 2530-2535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged A. Tanios ◽  
Michael L. Nevins ◽  
Katherine P. Hendra ◽  
Pierre Cardinal ◽  
Jill E. Allan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Weaning Predictors

Multifaceted support to improve clinical decision making in diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial in general practice

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 836-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. D. Frijling ◽  
C. M. Lobo ◽  
M. E. J. L. Hulscher ◽  
R. P. Akkermans ◽  
J. C. C. Braspenning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Value of Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (14) ◽  
pp. 1184-1197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhinav Saxena ◽  
A. Reshad Garan ◽  
Navin K. Kapur ◽  
William W. O’Neill ◽  
JoAnn Lindenfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Hemodynamic Monitoring ◽  
Mechanical Circulatory Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Widespread Availability

The recent widespread availability and use of mechanical circulatory support is transforming the management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock (CS). Clinical decision-making regarding the optimization of therapies for patients with CS can be guided effectively by hemodynamic monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). Because several studies regarding the benefit of PACs are ambiguous, the use of PACs is variable among clinicians treating patients with CS. More notable is that PAC use has not been studied as part of a randomized, controlled trial in patients with CS with or without mechanical circulatory support. Standardized approaches to hemodynamic monitoring in these patients can improve decision-making and outcomes. In this review, we summarize the hemodynamics of CS and mechanical circulatory support with PAC-derived measurements, and provide a compelling rationale for the use of PAC monitoring in patients with CS receiving mechanical circulatory support.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document