Meta-analysis of Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Approaches of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 658-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
YunJian Wu ◽  
Qiang Dong ◽  
Ping Han ◽  
LiangRen Liu ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengming Ji ◽  
Li Chen ◽  
Chengchuang Wu ◽  
Jinrong Li ◽  
Yu Hang ◽  
...  

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) via retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches.Method: A systematic literature search on keywords was undertaken using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Nation Knowledge (CNKI), and Wanfang. The eligible literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.0 software.Results: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies were identified with a total of 777 patients. Four hundred eight patients were treated with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP), and 368 patients were treated with transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty (TLP). The meta-analysis results showed that the two approaches were similar in terms of presence of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complication, the rate of conversion, and recurrence (p > 0.05). The operative time in the TLP group was significantly shorter than the RLP group (MD = 16.6; 95% CI, 3.40–29.80; p = 0.01). The duration of drainage was significantly shorter (MD = −1.06; 95% CI, −1.92 to −0.19; p = 0.02), and the score of postoperative visual analog score (VAS) was significantly lower in the RLP group than in the TLP group (MD = −0.52; 95% CI, −0.96 to −0.08; p = 0.02).Conclusion: Both approaches have good success rates and low postoperative complication rates. RLP provides a shorter duration of drainage and lower VAS score, but it takes more operative time than TLP.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
Scott V. Burgess ◽  
Michael M. Woods ◽  
Freddy Mendez-Torres ◽  
Erik P. Castle ◽  
Raju Thomas

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pejman Shadpour ◽  
H. Habib Akhyari ◽  
Robab Maghsoudi ◽  
Masoud Etemadian

Introduction: We report our experience with laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in horseshoe kidneys.Methods: Between February 2004 and March 2014, 15 patients with horseshoe kidneys and symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction underwent laparoscopic management at our national referral centre. Depending on the anatomy and presence of obtrusive vessels or isthmus, we performed either dismembered, Scardino or Foley YV pyeloplasty, or Hellstrom vessel transposition. Patients were initially evaluated by ultrasonography, then diuretic scintiscan at 4 to 6 months, and followed by yearly clinical and sonographic exams.Results: This study included 11 male and 4 female patients between the ages of 4 to 51 year (average 17.7). The left kidney was involved in 12 patients (80%). Operation time was 129 minutes (range: 90–186), and patients were discharged within 2.8 days (range: 1–6). Although 8 (53.3%) patients had crossing vessels, of which 6 required transposing, the Hellstrom technique was solely used in 3 cases, of which notably 1 case failed to resolve and required laparoscopic Hynes within the next year. Eight cases underwent dismembered pyeloplasty, 2 Foley YV, 1 Scardino flap and 1 required isthmectomy and vessel suspension. At the mean follow-up of 60 (range: 18–120) months, the overall success rate was 93.3%.Conclusions: To our knowledge, this represents the largest report on laparoscopic pyeloplasty for horseshoe kidneys, providing the longest follow-up. Our findings confirm prior reports supporting laparoscopy and furthermore show that despite the prevalence of crossing vessels, transposition alone is seldom sufficient.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Mizuno ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kojima ◽  
Satoshi Kurokawa ◽  
Hideyuki Kamisawa ◽  
Hidenori Nishio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document