Abstract
Aim
A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the current evidence for prophylactic antibiotic use in paediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP). As pyeloplasties are ‘clean contaminated’ procedures, prophylactic antibiotics are recommended, however, recent evidence suggests that antibiotics may be unnecessary. Prophylactic antibiotics are often either under or over prescribed in paediatric surgery, which increases the risk of developing antibiotic resistance. In general, minimally invasive surgery is associated with less postoperative infections, however, it is not yet clear how RALP compares with other approaches. Recent reviews have indicated prophylactic antibiotics may not decrease postoperative infections, however, there are no clear guidelines.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted of the following electronic databases: Pubmed, Medline Ovid, The Cochrane Library, TRIP Database, NICE Evidence Search, and EMBASE. The search terms used were: paediatric, pyeloplasty, robotic, antibiotic and were used as keywords as well as in combination as MeSH terms.
Results
Forty-one articles were retrieved, and after screening for relevance and redundancy, 2 articles remained including a total of 315 pyeloplasties. Prophylactic antibiotics did not reduce the incidence of postoperative UTIs in RALP.
Conclusion
Prophylactic antibiotics for RALP is not associated with lower rates of UTIs and therefore, may be reserved for patients with risk factors. However, due to the limited data and confounding factors, further research is required to optimise antibiotic stewardship and infection prevention.