Long-Term Visual Object Recognition Memory in Aged Rats

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Platano ◽  
Patrizia Fattoretti ◽  
Marta Balietti ◽  
Carlo Bertoni-Freddari ◽  
Giorgio Aicardi
1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 691-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Parker ◽  
Edward Wilding ◽  
Colin Akerman

This study reports the development of a new, modified delayed matching to sample (DMS) visual recognition memory task that controls the relative novelty of test stimuli and can be used in human and nonhuman primates. We report findings from normal humans and unoperated monkeys, as well as three groups of operated monkeys. In the study phase of this modified paradigm, subjects studied lists of two-dimensional visual object stimuli. In the test phase each studied object was presented again, now paired with a new stimulus (a foil), and the subject had to choose the studied item. In some lists one study item (the novel or isolate item) and its associated foil differed from the others (the homogenous items) along one stimulus dimension (color). The critical experimental measure was the comparison of the visual object recognition error rates for isolate and homogenous test items. This task was initially administered to human subjects and unoperated monkeys. Error rates for both groups were reliably lower for isolate than for homogenous stimuli in the same list position (the von Restorff effect). The task was then administered to three groups of monkeys who had selective brain lesions. Monkeys with bilateral lesions of the amygdala and fornix, two structures that have been proposed to play a role in novelty and memory encoding, were similar to normal monkeys in their performance on this task. Two further groups— with disconnection lesions of the perirhinal cortex and either the prefrontal cortex or the magnocellular mediodorsal thalamus—showed no evidence of a von Restorff effect. These findings are not consistent with previous proposals that the hippocampus and amygdala constitute a general novelty processing network. Instead, the results support an interaction between the perirhinal and frontal cortices in the processing of certain kinds of novel information that support visual object recognition memory.


Hippocampus ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 466-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris J. Tinsley ◽  
Katherine E. Narduzzo ◽  
Malcolm W. Brown ◽  
E. Clea Warburton

NeuroImage ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 748
Author(s):  
N.J. Thai ◽  
M. Buckley ◽  
E. Ferguson ◽  
F. Gobet ◽  
A. Peters ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 635 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 124-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilberto L. Pardo Andreu ◽  
Natasha Maurmann ◽  
Gustavo Kellermann Reolon ◽  
Caroline B. de Farias ◽  
Gilberto Schwartsmann ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 341 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato M. Rosa ◽  
Debora G. Flores ◽  
Helmoz R. Appelt ◽  
Antônio Luiz Braga ◽  
João Antônio Pêgas Henriques ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mariam Hovhannisyan ◽  
Alex Clarke ◽  
Benjamin R. Geib ◽  
Rosalie Cicchinelli ◽  
Zachary Monge ◽  
...  

AbstractHumans have a remarkable fidelity for visual long-term memory, and yet the composition of these memories is a longstanding debate in cognitive psychology. While much of the work on long-term memory has focused on processes associated with successful encoding and retrieval, more recent work on visual object recognition has developed a focus on the memorability of specific visual stimuli. Such work is engendering a view of object representation as a hierarchical movement from low-level visual representations to higher level categorical organization of conceptual representations. However, studies on object recognition often fail to account for how these high- and low-level features interact to promote distinct forms of memory. Here, we use both visual and semantic factors to investigate their relative contributions to two different forms of memory of everyday objects. We first collected normative visual and semantic feature information on 1,000 object images. We then conducted a memory study where we presented these same images during encoding (picture target) on Day 1, and then either a Lexical (lexical cue) or Visual (picture cue) memory test on Day 2. Our findings indicate that: (1) higher level visual factors (via DNNs) and semantic factors (via feature-based statistics) make independent contributions to object memory, (2) semantic information contributes to both true and false memory performance, and (3) factors that predict object memory depend on the type of memory being tested. These findings help to provide a more complete picture of what factors influence object memorability. These data are available online upon publication as a public resource.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document