Current Surgical Trainee Perceptions and Experiences in Telehealth

Author(s):  
Emaad J. Iqbal ◽  
Thomas Sutton ◽  
Mudassir S. Akther ◽  
Ashraf Samhan ◽  
Stephanie MacDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Joshua Clements

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in dynamic changes to healthcare delivery. Surgery as a specialty has been significantly affected and with that the delivery of surgical training. Method This national, collaborative, cross sectional study comprising 13 surgical trainee associations distributed a pan surgical specialty survey on the COVID-19 impact on surgical training over a 4-week period (11th May - 8th June 2020). The survey was voluntary and open to medical students and surgical trainees of all specialties and training grades. All aspects of training were qualitatively assessed. This study was reported according to STROBE guidelines. Results 810 completed responses were analysed. (M401: F 390) with representation from all deaneries and training grades. 41% of respondents (n = 301) were redeployed with 74% (n = 223) redeployed > 4 weeks. Complete loss of training was reported in elective operating (69.5% n = 474), outpatient activity (67.3%, n = 457), Elective endoscopy (69.5% n = 246) with > 50% reduction in training time reported in emergency operating (48%, n = 326) and completion of work-based assessments (WBA) (46%, n = 309). 81% (n = 551) reported course cancellations and departmental and regional teaching programmes were cancelled without rescheduling in 58% and 60% of cases respectively. A perceived lack of Elective operative exposure and completions of WBA’s were the primary reported factor affecting potential training progression. Overall, > 50% of trainees (n = 377) felt they would not meet the competencies required for that training period. Conclusion This study has demonstrated a perceived negative impact on numerous aspects of surgical training affecting all training specialties and grades.


Author(s):  
Linda Pohl ◽  
Megan Naidoo ◽  
Jennifer Rickard ◽  
Egide Abahuje ◽  
Nazmie Kariem ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. e780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo J. Bello ◽  
Samuel Sarmiento ◽  
Gedge D. Rosson ◽  
Damon S. Cooney ◽  
Scott D. Lifchez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Khan ◽  
G Torpiano ◽  
N Galbraith ◽  
M McLellan ◽  
A Lannigan

Abstract Aim The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption in surgical training. We aim to explore the preferences of higher general surgical trainees for Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP) also compare the responses across different training grades. Method All higher general surgical trainee in a single deanery were invited to participate in an online voluntary anonymous survey. The respondents were divided in two groups: junior (ST3-ST5) and senior higher surgical trainees (ST6-ST8) and responses compared. Results Sixty-four of 88 trainees responded. Thirty-three (51.6%) were ST3–ST5, 24 (37.5%) were ST6–ST8 and 7 (10.9%) were out-of-training. More trainees in ST3–ST5 group preferred to defer the next rotation for 12 months (18.2% vs 0%, p = 0.034), repeat current sub-specialty (33.3% vs 4.2%, p = 0.009), or add 12 months to training and delay predicted CCT date by 12 months (18.2% vs 0%, p = 0.034). Most trainees in both groups preferred the option of prolonging training should be offered to all trainees with an option to decline extension if ARCP competencies met (66.7% vs 50.0%, p = 0.276). Conclusions The preference for ARCP and length of training was different between two training groups, hence the need of trainees should be considered by training committees when addressing the impact of COVID-19.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S80-S81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Derbyshire ◽  
Aqsa Siddiqui ◽  
Moez Zeiton ◽  
James Pollard ◽  
David Jones

BMJ ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 337 (dec16 1) ◽  
pp. a2883-a2883 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Lieske
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document