Minimal sets, wandering domains, and rigidity in the 2-torus

1991 ◽  
pp. 129-138
Author(s):  
Alex Norton
Keyword(s):  
Minimal Sets ◽  
Wandering Domains

scholarly journals Minimal F2-flows

1985 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193
Author(s):  
Daniel Berend
Keyword(s):  
Hausdorff Dimension ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Affine Transformations ◽  
Dimensional Torus ◽  
Minimal Sets ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

AbstractLet σ be an ergodic endomorphism of the r–dimensional torus and Π a semigroup generated by two affine transformations lying above σ. We show that the flow defined by Π admits minimal sets of positive Hausdorff dimension and we give necessary and sufficient conditions for this flow to be minimal.

Invariant Radon measures and minimal sets for subgroups of Homeo+(R)

2020 ◽  
Vol 285 ◽  
pp. 107378
Author(s):  
Hui Xu ◽  
Enhui Shi ◽  
Yiruo Wang
Keyword(s):  
Radon Measures ◽  
Minimal Sets

Minimal Sets on Graphs and Dendrites

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (07) ◽  
pp. 1721-1725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Balibrea ◽  
Roman Hric ◽  
L'ubomír Snoha
Keyword(s):  
Topological Structure ◽  
Partial Characterization ◽  
Minimal Set ◽  
Full Characterization ◽  
Minimal Sets ◽  
Continuous Maps

The topological structure of minimal sets of continuous maps on graphs, dendrites and dendroids is studied. A full characterization of minimal sets on graphs and a partial characterization of minimal sets on dendrites are given. An example of a minimal set containing an interval on a dendroid is given.

Pseudoprojective strongly minimal sets are locally projective

1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 1184-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Buechler
Keyword(s):  
Predicate Symbol ◽  
Infinite Dimension ◽  
Elementary Extension ◽  
Morley Rank ◽  
Minimal Set ◽  
Unary Predicate ◽  
Minimal Sets

AbstractLet D be a strongly minimal set in the language L, and D′ ⊃ D an elementary extension with infinite dimension over D. Add to L a unary predicate symbol D and let T′ be the theory of the structure (D′, D), where D interprets the predicate D. It is known that T′ is ω-stable. We proveTheorem A. If D is not locally modular, then T′ has Morley rank ω.We say that a strongly minimal set D is pseudoprojective if it is nontrivial and there is a k < ω such that, for all a, b ∈ D and closed X ⊂ D, a ∈ cl(Xb) ⇒ there is a Y ⊂ X with a ∈ cl(Yb) and ∣Y∣ ≤ k. Using Theorem A, we proveTheorem B. If a strongly minimal set D is pseudoprojective, then D is locally projective.The following result of Hrushovski's (proved in §4) plays a part in the proof of Theorem B.Theorem C. Suppose that D is strongly minimal, and there is some proper elementary extension D1 of D such that the theory of the pair (D1, D) is ω1-categorical. Then D is locally modular.

One theorem of Zil′ber's on strongly minimal sets

1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1054-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Buechler
Keyword(s):  
Main Part ◽  
Minimal Set ◽  
Minimal Sets ◽  
Image Position

AbstractSuppose D ⊂ M is a strongly minimal set definable in M with parameters from C. We say D is locally modular if for all X, Y ⊂ D, with X = acl(X ∪ C)∩D, Y = acl(Y ∪ C) ∩ D and X ∩ Y ≠ ∅,We prove the following theorems.Theorem 1. Suppose M is stable and D ⊂ M is strongly minimal. If D is not locally modular then inMeqthere is a definable pseudoplane.(For a discussion of Meq see [M, §A].) This is the main part of Theorem 1 of [Z2] and the trichotomy theorem of [Z3].Theorem 2. Suppose M is stable and D, D′ ⊂ M are strongly minimal and nonorthogonal. Then D is locally modular if and only if D′ is locally modular.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document