Thick and Thin Accounts of Evil Action

Evil ◽  
2014 ◽  
pp. 69-92
Author(s):  
Luke Russell
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-315
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Latham ◽  
Kristie Miller ◽  
James Norton

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 173-194
Author(s):  
James Sias ◽  

According to a standard interpretation of Hannah Arendt’s remarks about evil, she had a psychologically thin conception of evil action. This paper has two aims. First, I argue that the distinction between psychological thinness and thickness is poorly conceived, at least as it commonly applies to theories of evil action. And second, I argue that, according to a better conception of the thin-thick distinction, Arendt is being misinterpreted.


Author(s):  
Bethania Assy

I analyze the ways in which the faculty of thinking can avoid evil action, taking into account Hannah Arendt's discussion regarding the banality of evil and thoughtlessness in connection with the Eichmann trial. I focus on the following question posed by Arendt: "Could the activity of thinking as such, the habit of examining and reflecting upon whatever happens to come to pass, regardless of specific content and quite independent of results, could this activity be of such a nature that it 'conditions' men against evildoing?" Examples of the connection between evildoing and thinking include the distinction between the commonplace and the banal, and the absence of the depth characteristic of banality and the necessity of thinking as the means for depth. I then focus upon Arendt's model thinker (Socrates) and argue that the faculty of thinking works to avoid evildoing by utilizing the Socratic principle of noncontradiction.


Last Acts ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 31-53
Author(s):  
Maggie Vinter

This chapter traces how arts of dying migrate from devotional texts into homiletic dramas and finally to the commercial playhouse between 1570 and 1590, around the same time that anti-theatrical condemnations of the stage as inherently blasphemous come to cultural prominence. Theater constitutes an important site of religious instruction and theological investigation not despite, but rather because of, its blasphemous potential. William Wager’s Enough Is as Good as a Feast, Nathaniel Woodes’s The Conflict of Conscience, and Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus all employ parodies of ars moriendi ideas to represent evil action. Parody arts of dying help dramatize a predestinarian cosmos where distinctions between the elect and the reprobate are fundamental, yet invisible to humans. The bad deaths in these plays function like negative theologies, manifesting and explicating divine will through attempted departures from it. In Doctor Faustus, Marlowe brings the reprobate parodist into focus alongside the divine parodied and makes the magician’s vicious death a site for analyzing human agency. As practices of dying are inverted into theatrical arts of dying badly, Elizabethan dramatists discover occasions to explore the nature of action and the forms of agency available in situations of extreme constraint or privation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Wahyudi

Murder is an evil action to take the soul of others. Everyone can be a murderer. Sociocultural background such as: age, sex, socio-economic, ethnic, and religion is not the reason for someone to kill others. Many factors make someone decide to kill others. One of the factors is known as killing motive. This qualitative research used the primary data. The subject were 5 people. There were 4 motives to kill, they are polygamy, money, debt, and frustration.


Evil ◽  
2014 ◽  
pp. 31-48
Author(s):  
Luke Russell
Keyword(s):  

Philosophy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus G. Singer
Keyword(s):  

Though ‘evil’ is often used loosely as merely the generic opposite of ‘morally good’, used precisely it is the worst possible term of opprobrium available. In this essay it is taken as applying primarily to persons, secondarily to conduct; evil deeds must flow from the volition to do something evil. An evil action is one so horrendously bad that no ordinary decent human being can conceive of doing it, and an evil person is one who knowingly wills or orders such actions. Malignant evil—doing evil because it is evil—is not just possible but real, and is one of several kinds of evil delineated. There are incidental discussions of cruelty, Rosenbaum on Explaining Hitler, Baumeister on Evil, and Benn on wickedness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document