scholarly journals A systematic review of the effectiveness of advance care planning interventions for people with cognitive impairment and dementia

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Robinson ◽  
Claire Dickinson ◽  
Nicolette Rousseau ◽  
Fiona Beyer ◽  
Alexa Clark ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 417-418
Author(s):  
Hyo Jung Lee ◽  
Giyeon Kim

Abstract Although there has been growing evidence that Advance care planning (ACP) benefits people with cognitive impairment nearing death, our understanding about this issue is still limited. This study examines whether cognitive impairment is associated with ACP engagement and end-of-life care preferences among older adults in the U.S. Using data from the 2012 National Health and Trends Study (n=1798, aged 65 to 101), we identified four levels of ACP engagement: None (28%), Informal ACP conversation only (12%), Formal ACP only (14%), and Both informal and formal ACP (46%). Older adults with None showed the highest prevalence of having cognitive impairment (17%), followed by those with Formal ACP only (15%) and the other two (6%, 6%). The results of Multinomial Logistic Regression showed that, compared to those without, respondents with cognitive impairment had 143% increased relative risk of having None (RR = 2.43, CI: 1.58-3.73) and 81% increased relative risk of completing Formal ACP only (RR = 1.81, CI: 1.11-2.95) relative to completing Both informal and formal ACP. In addition, respondents with None were more likely to prefer to receive all treatments available nearing death than those with any ACP engagement. Achieving high quality care at the end of life can be more challenging for older adults with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers due to the limited capacity. Although encouraged, informal ACP conversation with loved ones does not necessarily occur before the formal ACP, especially, for those with cognitive impairment. Therefore, they may merit more attention such as early ACP engagement.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A56.3-A57
Author(s):  
O Kiriaev ◽  
Emme Chacko ◽  
JD Jurgens ◽  
Meagan Ramages ◽  
P Malpas ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenny Cheong ◽  
Paul Fisher ◽  
Jenny Goh ◽  
Lynette Ng ◽  
Hui Mien Koh ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 47-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joni Gilissen ◽  
Lara Pivodic ◽  
Tinne Smets ◽  
Chris Gastmans ◽  
Robert Vander Stichele ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A24.3-A24
Author(s):  
Jan Schildmann ◽  
C Bausewein ◽  
Tanja Krones ◽  
A Simon ◽  
ST Simon ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 364.2-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby Dinnen ◽  
Huw Williams ◽  
Simon Noble ◽  
Adrian Edwards ◽  
Joyce Kenkre ◽  
...  

IntroductionAdvance Care Planning (ACP) is an important component of patient centred end-of-life care (Houben et al. 2014; Brinkman-Stoppelenburg et al. 2014). However there is little evidence available on the safety of the process and its impact on quality of care.AimTo characterise the nature of patient safety incidents arising around the ACP process for patients approaching end-of-life.MethodThe National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) collates patient safety incident reports across England and Wales. We performed a keyword search and manual review to identify relevant reports between 2005 and 2015. A mixed methods process combining structured data coding and exploratory descriptive analysis was undertaken to describe incidents underlying causes and outcomes. A thematic analysis identified areas on which to focus improvement initiatives.ResultsWe identified 67 incident reports in which patients experienced inadequate care due to issues with implementation of ACP. The most common source of error was (mis)communication of ACP (n=27) where documentation was lost or verbal handover was inaccurate. Over one third of reports (n=24) described an ACP not being followed. In the remaining reports (n=16) an ACP was not completed despite being appropriate. The most common contributory factor was inadequate staff knowledge (n=18). Common outcomes were cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts contrary to a patient’s wishes (n=18). Other outcomes included inappropriate treatment or transfer/admission.ConclusionOur national level analysis identifies key priorities which should be explored in local contexts: specifically improving public and staff understanding and engagement with ACP and developing systems for recording and accessing ACP documentation across healthcare services.References. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Rietjens JA, Van Der Heide A. The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine2014;28:1000–25.. Houben CH, Spruit MA, Groenen MT, Wouters EF, Janssen DJ. Efficacy of advance care planning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association2014;15:477–89.


Author(s):  
J Fahner ◽  
A Beunders ◽  
J van Delden ◽  
A Van der Heide ◽  
M Vanderschuren ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1662-1677
Author(s):  
Zhimeng Jia ◽  
Richard E. Leiter ◽  
Irene M. Yeh ◽  
James A. Tulsky ◽  
Justin J. Sanders

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document