scholarly journals Re: "Twenty Five Year Follow-up for Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Randomised Screening Trial"

2014 ◽  
Vol 180 (7) ◽  
pp. 759-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Weiss
2014 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 329-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony B. Miller ◽  
Claus Wall ◽  
Cornelia J. Baines ◽  
Ping Sun ◽  
Teresa To ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharareh Taghipour ◽  
Dragan Banjevic ◽  
Joanne Fernandes ◽  
Anthony B Miller ◽  
Neil Montgomery ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thuy T. T. Le ◽  
Frederick R. Adler

AbstractBACKGROUNDThe benefits of mammography screening have been controversial, with conflicting findings from various studies.METHODSWe hypothesize that unmeasured heterogeneity in tumor aggressiveness underlies these conflicting results. Based on published data from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (CNBSS), we develop and parameterize an individual-based mechanistic model for breast cancer incidence and mortality that tracks five stages of breast cancer progression and incorporates the effects of age on breast cancer incidence and all-cause mortality.RESULTSThe model accurately reproduces the reported outcomes of the CNBSS. By varying parameters, we predict that the benefits of mammography depend on the effectiveness of cancer treatment and tumor.CONCLUSIONSIn particular, patients with the most rapidly growing or potentially largest tumors have the highest benefit and least harm from the screening, with only a relatively small effect of age. However, the model predicts that confining mammography populations with a high risk of acquiring breast cancer increases the screening benefit only slightly compared with the full population.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 210s-210s
Author(s):  
D. Singh ◽  
A. Anttila ◽  
N. Malila ◽  
J. Pitkaniemi ◽  
J. Miettinen

Background: Efforts to reduce mortality through early detection and diagnosis has intensified in the recent decade. An important risk factor, 'breast symptoms' reported by women during screening visit, is still overlooked. Aim: To study the association between breast symptoms reported at screening visit and the risk of cancer incidence and mortality in a prospective manner over a period of 24-years. Methods: This population based matched cohort study was based on the follow-up of the ongoing Finnish National Breast Cancer Screening Program (FNBCSP) that began in 1987. Symptomatic subjects who attended screening with symptoms (lump, 39,965 visits; retraction, 24,190 visits; nipple discharge, 7882 visits) were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry database. For each visit with symptoms, nonsymptomatic controls were matched (1:1 for lump and retraction; 1:2 for nipple discharge) based on age at screening visit (within 2 years), year of invitation (2 years band), number of invited visits, and municipality of invitation. The primary outcomes were incidence of breast cancer and incidence-based mortality, including all-cause mortality. Results: Women who reported lump or retraction had about twofold risk of breast cancer incidence, threefold risk of breast cancer mortality and all-cause mortality respectively as compared with women without respective symptoms. We found a substantial difference in mortality rates throughout the follow-up period between symptomatic and asymptomatic group. In absolute terms, for lump, in every 1000 screening visits, 20 women died of breast cancer as compared with 7 women without lump, and 30 vs 11 all-cause deaths in women with and without lump, respectively after 24 years of follow-up. We also found difference in the number of deaths in women who reported retraction or nipple discharge. Conclusion: This study provides comprehensive evidence that women with breast symptoms remain in a higher risk of dying over a very long period. Guidelines to reduce these inequalities needs to be developed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document