A multifaceted approach in leveraging electronic health record tools for safe inpatient use of concentrated U-500 insulin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A Willner ◽  
Jeffrey Ketz ◽  
Ramona A Davis ◽  
Angela W Yaniv ◽  
Alina Bulgar-Grozav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Measuring Device ◽  
Multifaceted Approach ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Insulin Use

Abstract Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose The Institute for Safe Medication Practices classifies subcutaneous insulin as a high-risk medication. Concentrated U-500 insulin carries additional risks in comparison to conventional U-100 insulin, as the 5-fold more concentrated nature of this product, limitations to insulin pen dosing, and various devices for dose measurement may lead to miscommunication of patient-reported doses, resulting in downstream errors in ordering, verification, or administration. We describe a multifaceted approach to leveraging technical tools within the electronic health record (EHR) for U-500 insulin use. Summary At Cleveland Clinic, the U-500 insulin use process evolved in a number of phases using EHR tools. Phase 1 included new clinical decision support and documentation tools during order entry, including a customized alert that fired during order entry recommending that the prescriber order a consult with endocrinology and requiring the prescriber to provide the patient’s home insulin measuring device and the source of the patient’s reported home dose. In order verification, a customized alert fired directing the pharmacist to contact the patient or patient’s nurse and validate the information provided by the prescriber. Phase 2 involved transitioning dispensing of patient-specific doses from tuberculin syringes to U-500 insulin syringes. Phase 3 transitioned to use of U-500 insulin pens and included automatic dose rounding of ordered doses down to the nearest 5 units, and an additional customized pharmacist alert intended for cost conservation was added to fire if the patient had a recent administration of U-500 insulin documented, directing the pharmacist to determine whether the nurse needed a new pen dispensed. Conclusion Cleveland Clinic successfully implemented customized tools and processes within the EHR pertaining to the prescribing, verification, dispensing, and administration of U-500 insulin.

What does social isolation have to do with my arthritis? Patient and provider views of the implementation of an electronic Social Determinants of Health risk assessment tool

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 707-710
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Institute Of Medicine ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Item Responses ◽  
Electronic Health

Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) are the conditions in which people are born, live, learn, work, and play that can affect health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes. The Institute of Medicine charged healthcare institutions with capturing and measuring patient SDoH risk factors through the electronic health record. Following the implementation of a social determinants of health electronic module across a major health institution, the response to institutional implementation was evaluated. To assess the response, a multidisciplinary team interviewed patients and providers, mapped the workflow, and performed simulated tests to trace the flow of SDoH data from survey item responses to visualization in EHR output for clinicians. Major results of this investigation were: 1) the lack of patient consensus about value of collecting SDOH data, and 2) the disjointed view of patient reported SDoH risks across patients, providers, and the electronic health record due to the way data was collected and visualized.

scholarly journals Association of Display of Patient Photographs in the Electronic Health Record With Wrong-Patient Order Entry Errors

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. e2019652
Author(s):  
Hojjat Salmasian ◽  
Bonnie B. Blanchfield ◽  
Kelley Joyce ◽  
Kaila Centeio ◽  
Gordon B. Schiff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Frequency and Types of Patient-Reported Errors in Electronic Health Record Ambulatory Care Notes

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. e205867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigall K. Bell ◽  
Tom Delbanco ◽  
Joann G. Elmore ◽  
Patricia S. Fitzgerald ◽  
Alan Fossa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Ambulatory Care ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Electronic Health

Integrating patient-reported outcomes data into the electronic health record.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 186-186
Author(s):  
Brandon Bosch ◽  
Scott Hartman ◽  
Lauren Caldarello ◽  
Diane Denny, DBA
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Population Analysis ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Health Record ◽  
National Network ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Electronic Health

186 Background: As a national network of hospitals that specialize in the treatment of patients fighting complex or advanced-stage cancer, the network was an early adopter of using patient reported outcome (PRO) data as part of its routine patient assessment and treatment. Since 2012 an externally validated tool has been used to capture patients’ perceived symptom burden for real-time clinical intervention, from the point of first visit throughout the course of treatment, at intervals of 21 days or greater. Research has demonstrated the use of PRO data as a valuable component of a patient’s treatment plan, promoting improved quality and length of life. Methods: The use of this data across the network was expanded such that results once only accessible on paper and via electronically stored images, has now been fully integrated into the electronic health record (EHR). A multidisciplinary project team formulated the specifications for a successful integration of PRO data into the EHR. Results: The project achieved its goal and went beyond data integration to include implementation of a solution to facilitate documentation of intervention against patients’ symptoms. Provider workflow efficiency is greatly enhanced via single system access and visual notification, with critical values flagged, to focus providers’ attention on severe symptoms. Incorporation of a unified EHR flowsheet provides a paperless, one-stop symptom assessment approach and streamlined mechanism for intervention documentation. The documentation module leverages structured data fields and linkage of PRO data with interventions, such as specialist referrals or medication orders, to support enhanced patient care and quality improvement. Conclusions: The ability to easily view an array of patient reported concerns and document interventions against severe or significantly worsening symptoms provides clinicians an enhanced ability to address quality of life related needs. PRO data is now stored electronically in the enterprise warehouse, thus enabling aggregation with data from which to perform population analysis and eventually, pursue opportunities for predictive modeling.

scholarly journals Overcoming barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record: a case report

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A Harle ◽  
Alyson Listhaus ◽  
Constanza M Covarrubias ◽  
Siegfried OF Schmidt ◽  
Sean Mackey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
System Development ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Clinical Tools ◽  
The Right

Abstract In this case report, the authors describe the implementation of a system for collecting patient-reported outcomes and integrating results in an electronic health record. The objective was to identify lessons learned in overcoming barriers to collecting and integrating patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. The authors analyzed qualitative data in 42 documents collected from system development meetings, written feedback from users, and clinical observations with practice staff, providers, and patients. Guided by the Unified Theory on the Adoption and Use of Information Technology, 5 emergent themes were identified. Two barriers emerged: (i) uncertain clinical benefit and (ii) time, work flow, and effort constraints. Three facilitators emerged: (iii) process automation, (iv) usable system interfaces, and (v) collecting patient-reported outcomes for the right patient at the right time. For electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcomes to succeed as useful clinical tools, system designers must ensure the clinical relevance of the information being collected while minimizing provider, staff, and patient burden.

scholarly journals Capturing a Patient-Reported Measure of Physical Function Through an Online Electronic Health Record Patient Portal in an Ambulatory Clinic: Implementation Study (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Jinoos Yazdany ◽  
Laura Trupin ◽  
Zara Izadi ◽  
Milena Gianfrancesco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Rheumatology Clinic ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Physical Function Score ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
White Patients

BACKGROUND Despite significant interest in the collection of patient-reported outcomes to make care more patient-centered, few studies have evaluated implementation efforts to collect patient-reported outcomes from diverse patient populations OBJECTIVE We assessed the collection of patient-reported outcomes from rheumatoid arthritis patients in an academic rheumatology clinic, using a paper and an online form through the electronic health record patient portal. METHODS We identified patients seen between 2012-2016 with ≥2 face-to-face encounters with a rheumatology provider and International Classification of Diseases codes for RA, ≥30 days apart. In 2013, our clinic implemented a paper version of the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function form that was administered to patients upon their check-in at the clinic. In 2015, an online version of the form became available by way of the electronic health record patient portal to patients with active portal accounts. We compared the proportion of visits with documented PROMIS scores across age, race and ethnicity, and language and examined trends over time using a control chart. RESULTS We included 1078 patients with rheumatoid arthritis with 7049 in-person encounters at the rheumatology clinic over 4 years, with an average of 168 visits per month. Of the included patients, 80.4% of patients (867/1078) were female and the mean age was 58 (SD 16) years. The overall PROMIS physical function score documentation increased from 60.4% (1081/1791) of visits in 2013 to 74.4% (905/1217) of visits in 2016. Online score documentation increased from 10.0% (148/1473) in 2015 to 19.3% (235/1217) in 2016. African American patients were least likely to have a PROMIS physical function score recorded (55/88, 62.5% compared to 792/990, 80.0% for other racial or ethnic groups; P<.001). Compared with white patients, both African American and Hispanic patients were less likely to have active online electronic health record portal accounts (44/88, 50% and 90/157, 57.3% respectively, compared to 437/521, 83.9% of white patients; P<.001) and, once activated, less likely to use the online survey (6/44, 13.6% and 16/90, 17.8% respectively, compared to 135/437, 30.9% of white patients; P=.02). There was no significant difference in the proportion of any PROMIS physical function forms recorded between non-English vs English preferred patients. No significant differences were found across age or gender. CONCLUSIONS PROMIS physical function form completion improved overall from 2012-2016 but lagged among racial and ethnic minorities and non-English preferred patients. Future studies should address issues of portal access, enrollment, satisfaction, and persistence and focus on developing PRO implementation strategies that accommodate the needs and preferences of diverse populations.

Implementation and early adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures into an electronic health record: A technical report

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Taffet Gold ◽  
Raj J Karia ◽  
Alissa Link ◽  
Rachel Lebwohl ◽  
Joseph D Zuckerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Computerized Adaptive Testing ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Electronic Health

We integrated and optimized patient-reported outcome measures into the electronic health record to provide quantitative, objective data regarding patients’ health status, which is important for patient care, payer contracts, and research. With a multidisciplinary team from information technology, clinical informatics, population health, and physician champions, we used formal human–computer interaction techniques and user-centered design to integrate several technology platforms and computerized adaptive testing for the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. The patient-reported outcome measure system leverages software frequently used by health systems and provides data for research and clinical care via a mobile-responsive web application using Symfony, with REDCap for configuring assessments and de-identified data storage. The system incorporates Oracle databases and Epic flowsheets. Patients complete patient-reported outcome measures, with data viewable in MyChart and Epic Synopsis Reports. Researchers can access data portals. The highly usable, successful patient-reported outcome measures platform is acceptable to patients and clinicians and achieved 73 percent overall completion rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document