scholarly journals Evaluation of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Preoperative Chemoradiation Using IMRT in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer – An Indian Experience

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. ii54
Author(s):  
Saha Subrata ◽  
Gupta Shaikat ◽  
Sarkar Subhasis ◽  
Chatterjee Subrata
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii212-viii213
Author(s):  
G. Harada ◽  
R.R.D.C.C. Bonadio ◽  
F.C.C. de Araújo ◽  
C.R. Victor ◽  
F.R. Takeda ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 144-144
Author(s):  
Divya Yerramilli ◽  
Davendra Sohal ◽  
Ursina R. Teitelbaum ◽  
Paul Stephen Wissel ◽  
Nevena Damjanov ◽  
...  

144 Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation and surgery is unclear in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. We studied the toxicities and clinical outcomes in patients treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) after trimodality therapy. Methods: Records of patients with T3+ or N+ esophageal cancer who received preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgical resection from 2003-2013 were reviewed. Patients with postoperative deaths or poor performance status within 3 months after surgery were excluded (n = 13). Tolerability and hematologic toxicities of adjuvant CTX were recorded. Clinical outcomes of patients treated with adjuvant CTX were compared with a cohort of patients who received no further therapy (NFT). Results: Of the 81 trimodality patients included in the study, 53 received CTX and 28 received NFT after surgery. Median follow-up time was 23 months. FOLFOX (34%), cisplatin/5-FU (15%), 5-FU/LV (15%), ECF (13%), and carboplatin/paclitaxel (9%) were the most commonly used adjuvant regimens. Multiple rationales for adjuvant CTX were cited, including pathologic nodal status (32%), favorable pathologic response (61%), and provider preference (51%). Grade III/IV hematologic toxicity occurred in 11% of the CTX group: leukopenia (8%/2%), neutropenia (4%/4%), and thrombocytopenia (2%/0%). Two patients in the CTX group did not complete their prescribed CTX, which was discontinued after 1 cycle. Patient and clinical characteristics between CTX and NFT patients were well-balanced, except for pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (CTX 25% vs. NFT 50%, p=0.03). Three-year OS and DFS were similar between CTX and NFT patients (74% vs 70%, 60% vs. 64%, respectively). In patients who achieved pCR (33% overall), adjuvant CTX was associated with an improved 3-yr OS (86% vs. 62%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.22). Distant failures occurred in 11% of the CTX group and 18% of the NFT group. Conclusions: Adjuvant CTX after trimodality therapy in esophageal cancer is feasible and well-tolerated with encouraging clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to define the role of adjuvant CTX in these patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 498-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Harada ◽  
Renata Rodrigues da Cunha Colombo Bonadio ◽  
Frederico Cantarino Cordeiro de Araújo ◽  
Carolina Ribeiro Victor ◽  
Rubens Antonio Aissar Sallum ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14571-e14571
Author(s):  
Baruch Brenner ◽  
Yulia Kundel ◽  
Ofer Purim ◽  
Gal Medalia ◽  
Liran Olshinka ◽  
...  

e14571 Background: This prospective phase IB/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the addition of cetuximab to standard preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). We hereby report its preliminary results. Methods: Patients (pts) with potentially resectable LAEC, defined as T2-4N0-1M0, T1-4N1M0 or T1-4N0-1M1A tumors, received an induction cycle of cisplatin 100 mg/m2, day 1, and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/day as a continuous infusion (CI), days 1–5, followed 4 weeks later by 50.4 Gy radiotherapy (RT) given concurrently with 2 cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and escalating doses of CI 5-FU, days 1–4 and 29-32. Pts received also 10 weekly infusions of cetuximab, 250 mg/m2, with a loading dose of 400 mg/m2, starting from the induction. The phase II part of the study started when the 5-FU dose during CRT was defined. Surgery was planned 6-8 weeks after CRT. Results: Thirty-six pts have been enrolled to date and 32 completed CRT. The median age was 65 years and 60% were males. The ratio of squamous/adeno histologies was 53%/47%. Pts had very advanced tumors: 95% T3-T4, 63% N1 and 28% M1A. In the absence of dose limiting toxicity, 31 pts received the phase II dose of 5-FU, defined as 1000 mg/m2/day. The most common grade >3 toxicities were leucopenia (51% of pts) and neutropenia (48%). There was one toxic death, due to neutropenic sepsis. Among the 27 operated pts, R0 resection was achieved in 24 (89%). There were 4 cases (15%) of postoperative mortality, due to infection (3 pts) or respiratory failure (1). Downstaging was noted in 83% of pts and pathological complete response (pCR) in 32%. Pts with squamous histology had a higher pCR rate (53% vs 7%, p=0.007). At the time of the analysis, 14 pts (40%) remain free of disease and the local control rate is 92%. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Preliminary results from this prospective study suggest that the addition of cetuximab to standard CRT is safe. The R0, pCR and local control rates are encouraging. Squamous cell tumors may gain more benefit from the addition of cetuximab.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document