Adjuvant chemotherapy after trimodality therapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 144-144
Author(s):  
Divya Yerramilli ◽  
Davendra Sohal ◽  
Ursina R. Teitelbaum ◽  
Paul Stephen Wissel ◽  
Nevena Damjanov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiation ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

144 Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation and surgery is unclear in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. We studied the toxicities and clinical outcomes in patients treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) after trimodality therapy. Methods: Records of patients with T3+ or N+ esophageal cancer who received preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgical resection from 2003-2013 were reviewed. Patients with postoperative deaths or poor performance status within 3 months after surgery were excluded (n = 13). Tolerability and hematologic toxicities of adjuvant CTX were recorded. Clinical outcomes of patients treated with adjuvant CTX were compared with a cohort of patients who received no further therapy (NFT). Results: Of the 81 trimodality patients included in the study, 53 received CTX and 28 received NFT after surgery. Median follow-up time was 23 months. FOLFOX (34%), cisplatin/5-FU (15%), 5-FU/LV (15%), ECF (13%), and carboplatin/paclitaxel (9%) were the most commonly used adjuvant regimens. Multiple rationales for adjuvant CTX were cited, including pathologic nodal status (32%), favorable pathologic response (61%), and provider preference (51%). Grade III/IV hematologic toxicity occurred in 11% of the CTX group: leukopenia (8%/2%), neutropenia (4%/4%), and thrombocytopenia (2%/0%). Two patients in the CTX group did not complete their prescribed CTX, which was discontinued after 1 cycle. Patient and clinical characteristics between CTX and NFT patients were well-balanced, except for pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (CTX 25% vs. NFT 50%, p=0.03). Three-year OS and DFS were similar between CTX and NFT patients (74% vs 70%, 60% vs. 64%, respectively). In patients who achieved pCR (33% overall), adjuvant CTX was associated with an improved 3-yr OS (86% vs. 62%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.22). Distant failures occurred in 11% of the CTX group and 18% of the NFT group. Conclusions: Adjuvant CTX after trimodality therapy in esophageal cancer is feasible and well-tolerated with encouraging clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to define the role of adjuvant CTX in these patients.

Use of PET SUV for primary tumor to predict outcome in locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with trimodality therapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15559-e15559
Author(s):  
G. M. Videtic ◽  
H. M. Macley ◽  
C. Reddy ◽  
D. J. Adelstein ◽  
T. W. Rice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

e15559 Background: To assess the value of the primary tumor's SUVmax (PT-SUVmax) from the staging FDG-PET as a predictor of clinical and pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with T3/4 and/or node positive esophageal carcinoma treated at the Cleveland Clinic between 7/1/03 and 5/31/06. All patients were managed with an institutional regimen consisting of preoperative radiotherapy [30 Gy @ 1.5 Gy twice daily over two weeks] with concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil during the first week. Following resection, an identical postoperative course of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was delivered. Pretreatment patient and tumor characteristics including PT-SUVmax were analyzed with respect to response and survival. Results: 141 patients completed preoperative CRT: 125 (88.7%) were male, median age was 60 years, 73.8% had adenocarcinoma, 79.4% had N1 disease, 81.6% underwent surgery and 63.8% completed the full regimen. Median follow-up was 17.2 months [range 0.7–75.1]. Median PT-SUVmax was 9.43 [range 0 to 47.7]. Increasing clinical stage was associated with increasing PT-SUVmaxs: for cT2 vs. cT3 and cN0 vs. cN1, PT-SUVmax cutoffs were 8 (p=0.03) and 11 (p=0.02), respectively. Median (MST) and 5-year overall survivals were 20.7 months and 27.4%, respectively. A PT-SUVmax of < vs. > 7 was a significant predictor for T downstaging (p=0.0502) and N downstaging (p=0.0467). A PT-SUVmax cutoff of 7.6 was associated with a significant difference in MST, at 29.1 and 13.0 months for PT-SUVmax< 7.6 and >7.6, respectively (p=0.0158, HR=1.82, 95%CI=1.19–2.94). On multivariate analysis, PT-SUVmax was the only significant factor associated with survival (p=0.0.314, HR=1.71, 95%CI=1.05–2.79). Conclusions: The pretreatment SUVmax of a primary esophageal cancer appears to correlate with clinical stage, pathologic response to therapy and survival. This finding could play a role in the design of clinical trials and in adapting treatment strategies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A National Cancer Database analysis of treatment utilization and associated outcomes in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 138-138
Author(s):  
Gregory Riccardo Vlacich ◽  
Pamela Parker Samson ◽  
Stephanie Mabry Perkins ◽  
Michael Charles Roach ◽  
Parag J. Parikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Palliative Therapy ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Treatment Utilization ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

138 Background: Elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer pose a therapeutic challenge since definitive treatment involves aggressive combined-modality therapy. Whether these individuals are offered or benefit from these approaches in the modern, trimodality era has not been widely explored. Methods: Patients ≥ 70 years old with clinical stage II and III esophageal cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2012 were identified from the National Cancer Database and stratified based on treatment. Variables independently associated with treatment utilization were evaluated using logistic regression and mortality hazard evaluated using Cox-proportional hazards analysis. The primary aim was to compare overall survival by treatment group. The secondary aim was to identify variables associated with receiving each modality. Results: A total of 21,593 patients were identified. Median and maximum ages were 77 and 90 respectively. In 12.9%, no therapy was delivered, 24.3% received palliative therapy, 37.1% received definitive chemoradiation, 5.6% received esophagectomy alone, and 10.0% received trimodality therapy. On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 80 (OR 0.73, p < 0.001), female gender (OR 0.81, p < 0.001), and treatment at high-volume centers (OR 0.83, p = 0.008) were associated with a decreased likelihood of palliative therapy over no treatment. Age ≥ 80 (OR 0.15, p < 0.001), female gender (OR 0.80, p = 0.03), and non-Caucasian race (OR 0.63, p < 0.001) were associated with decreased trimodality use compared to definitive chemoradiation. Each treatment independently demonstrated improved survival compared to no therapy: palliative treatment (HR 0.49), concurrent chemoradiation (HR 0.36), esophagectomy (HR 0.31), trimodality therapy (HR 0.25), all p < 0.001. Conclusions: Any therapy, including palliative care, was associated with improved survival compared to no treatment in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Subsets of patients are less likely to receive aggressive therapy based on social and institutional factors. Care should be taken to not unnecessarily deprive elderly patients of treatment that may improve survival.

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients without local nodal metastases following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 111-111
Author(s):  
Christopher Duane Nevala-Plagemann ◽  
Samual Francis ◽  
Courtney Christine Cavalieri ◽  
Shane Lloyd ◽  
Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Nodal Metastases ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

111 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by esophagectomy is the current standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The potential benefit of additional postoperative chemotherapy is still under investigation. In this study, we utilized the National Cancer Database to assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who were found to have node negative disease (pN0) following surgery. Methods: Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively identified using the National Cancer Database. Patients who were postoperatively staged as pN0 were then separated based on whether or not they received adjuvant chemotherapy. Using Kaplan-Meier estimation and a multivariate cox regression analysis, the overall survival of those who received adjuvant therapy was then compared to those who received neoadjuvant CRT alone. Results: 3,159 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer underwent neoadjuvant CRT and were found to be pN0 following surgery. 119 of these patients received postoperative chemotherapy. The 1, 5, and 8-year overall survival in those receiving adjuvant therapy was 95.9%, 49.9%, and 47.7% compared to 85.8%, 44.6%, and 33.0% in those receiving neoadjuvant CRT alone, respectively (p = 0.019). Based on multivariate analysis, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with increased overall survival (p = 0.011; HR 0.658; 95% CI, 0.476 to 0.908). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival in patients with locally advance esophageal cancer who have no evidence of local nodal metastases following surgery. Additional clinical trials are needed to further confirm which patients may benefit from adjuvant therapy and to determine the optimal postoperative therapeutic regimen.

scholarly journals Risk of radiation pneumonitis in patients receiving taxane-based trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 388-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talha Shaikh ◽  
Thomas M. Churilla ◽  
Pooja Monpara ◽  
Walter J. Scott ◽  
Steven J. Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Radiation Pneumonitis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document