scholarly journals No-Scar Breast Reduction Utilizing Power-Assisted Liposuction Mammaplasty, Loops, and Lipofilling

Author(s):  
Marwan H Abboud ◽  
Hiba N El Hajj ◽  
Nicolas M Abboud

Abstract Background In the context of continuous interest to develop and refine minimally invasive procedures, recent publications reported a scarless approach in breast lifting. Objectives The authors describe a power-assisted lipomodeling technique combined with surgical loops to achieve breast reduction and reshaping with minimal scars. Methods Between 2014 and 2018, a total of 94 patients underwent breast reduction by combined liposuction and loops. Following infiltration of the breasts, liposuction of the outer quadrants and the lower pole was achieved to reduce the breast footprint and the lateral and inferior heaviness of the breast. After multiaxial multiplanar tunnelization, three types of loops were taken around the breast to suspend and elevate the breast skin envelope and parenchyma. Each loop was guided through a 3 mm, three-hole cannula passed through skin stab incisions. The first loop was designed to reduce the breast footprint and enhance the breast projection, whereas the second loop is designed to achieve breast conus remodeling and can be performed three to five times. The third loop was passed circumferentially around the areola and then cephalad along the breast axis and pulled until the desired NAC elevation was reached. Each loop was pulled to achieve the desired breast projection and shape. Results The authors achieved breast reduction with a mean nipple elevation of 7.3 cm, and 88% of patients were satisfied with their breast shape. The total complication rate was 1%, including mild cellulitis in one breast, treated efficiently with oral antibiotics. Conclusions The proposed technique is a novel, simple, and safe alternative to achieve breast reduction and reshaping without a scar.

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Beutner ◽  
M. May ◽  
B. Hoschke ◽  
C. Helke ◽  
M. Lein ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1015-1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Frede ◽  
Ahmed Hammady ◽  
Jan Klein ◽  
Dogu Teber ◽  
Noriyuki Inaki ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly E. Diaz ◽  
Douglas Tremblay ◽  
Begum Ozturk ◽  
Ghideon Ezaz ◽  
Suzanne Arinsburg ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan W. Miller ◽  
Mindi S. Miller

Urinary incontinence (UI) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are 2 common urogenital problems in men. UI is associated with involuntary leakage of urine and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of urgency, frequency, and nocturia. Types of UI include functional, urge, stress, and overflow. Treatment for UI is based on the type of incontinence, patient-specific factors, and treatment preferences of both patients and health care providers. Options for the management of UI include environmental modifications, disposable incontinence products, pelvic floor exercises, pharmacotherapy, surgically implanted devices, and intermittent catheterization. BPH may be also associated with LUTS. Patient symptoms, assessed with a measurement tool such as the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI), serve as the basis for determining treatment. Management approaches for BPH include pharmacotherapy, surgery, and minimally invasive procedures. Anticholinergic drugs as well as α-receptor antagonists and 5-α reductase inhibitors, either alone or in combination, are effective and useful for LUTS unresponsive to traditional pharmacotherapy. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) can eliminate symptoms of BPH but is associated with relatively more complications than other available surgical and minimally invasive procedures.


2021 ◽  
pp. 44-46
Author(s):  
Ishita Laha ◽  
Shahid Hameed ◽  
Swapnil Sen ◽  
Kalyan Kumar Sarkar

Foreign bodies are occasionally reported in the urinary bladder, especially in females. The consequences and clinical impact depend on the route of insertion and the patient’s hemodynamic condition, and their removal may include minimally invasive procedures to open cystostomy. In most cases, foreign bodies are removed through transurethral approach. Here, we report one such case of a foreign body in the urinary bladder, which was self-inserted and had perforated through the bladder wall, yet could be successfully managed by cystoscopic removal without any complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document