scholarly journals Desert ants use foraging distance to adapt the nest search to the uncertainty of the path integrator

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Merkle ◽  
Rüdiger Wehner
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 20130070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Buehlmann ◽  
Bill S. Hansson ◽  
Markus Knaden

Desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis , are equipped with remarkable skills that enable them to navigate efficiently. When travelling between the nest and a previously visited feeding site, they perform path integration (PI), but pinpoint the nest or feeder by following odour plumes. Homing ants respond to nest plumes only when the path integrator indicates that they are near home. This is crucial, as homing ants often pass through plumes emanating from foreign nests and do not discriminate between the plume of their own and that of a foreign nest, but should absolutely avoid entering a wrong nest. Their behaviour towards food odours differs greatly. Here, we show that in ants on the way to food, olfactory information outweighs PI information. Although PI guides ants back to a learned feeder, the ants respond to food odours independently of whether or not they are close to the learned feeding site. This ability is beneficial, as new food sources—unlike foreign nests—never pose a threat but enable ants to shorten distances travelled while foraging. While it has been shown that navigating C. fortis ants rely strongly on PI, we report here that the ants retained the necessary flexibility in the use of PI.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 856-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Schwarz ◽  
Antoine Wystrach ◽  
Ken Cheng

Many animals rely on path integration for navigation and desert ants are the champions. On leaving the nest, ants continuously integrate their distance and direction of travel so that they always know their current distance and direction from the nest and can take a direct path to home. Distance information originates from a step-counter and directional information is based on a celestial compass. So far, it has been assumed that the directional information obtained from ocelli contribute to a single global path integrator, together with directional information from the dorsal rim area (DRA) of the compound eyes and distance information from the step-counter. Here, we show that ocelli mediate a distinct compass from that mediated by the compound eyes. After travelling a two-leg outbound route, untreated foragers headed towards the nest direction, showing that both legs of the route had been integrated. In contrast, foragers with covered compound eyes but uncovered ocelli steered in the direction opposite to the last leg of the outbound route. Our findings suggest that, unlike the DRA, ocelli cannot by themselves mediate path integration. Instead, ocelli mediate a distinct directional system, which buffers the most recent leg of a journey.


2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1349-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Knaden ◽  
Rüdiger Wehner
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 947-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Eyer ◽  
L. Leniaud ◽  
H. Darras ◽  
S. Aron

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 1368-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Müller ◽  
Rüdiger Wehner

2005 ◽  
Vol 65-66 ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Touretzky
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Steck ◽  
Bill S Hansson ◽  
Markus Knaden

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document