Correlation in a singly truncated bivariate normal distribution IV. Empirical variances of rank correlation coefficients

Biometrika ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-438
Author(s):  
M. A. AITKIN ◽  
M. W. HUME
1978 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren S. Martin

Distortion in the Pearson product moment correlation due to a restricted number of scale points is evaluated in two ways. First, a simulation of the bivariate normal distribution is used to estimate the effects of varying the number of scale points on the product moment correlation. This procedure demonstrates a substantial amount of information loss. Second, other correlation coefficients and some methods to correct for this loss are discussed and related to the simulation data.


Psychometrika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Barbiero ◽  
Asmerilda Hitaj

Abstract We consider a bivariate normal distribution with linear correlation $$\rho $$ ρ whose random components are discretized according to two assigned sets of thresholds. On the resulting bivariate ordinal random variable, one can compute Goodman and Kruskal’s gamma coefficient, $$\gamma $$ γ , which is a common measure of ordinal association. Given the known analytical monotonic relationship between Pearson’s $$\rho $$ ρ and Kendall’s rank correlation $$\tau $$ τ for the bivariate normal distribution, and since in the continuous case, Kendall’s $$\tau $$ τ coincides with Goodman and Kruskal’s $$\gamma $$ γ , the change of this association measure before and after discretization is worth studying. We consider several experimental settings obtained by varying the two sets of thresholds, or, equivalently, the marginal distributions of the final ordinal variables. This study, confirming previous findings, shows how the gamma coefficient is always larger in absolute value than Kendall’s rank correlation; this discrepancy lessens when the number of categories increases or, given the same number of categories, when using equally probable categories. Based on these results, a proposal is suggested to build a bivariate ordinal variable with assigned margins and Goodman and Kruskal’s $$\gamma $$ γ by ordinalizing a bivariate normal distribution. Illustrative examples employing artificial and real data are provided.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Lorenzo Olvera Astivia

I present a geometric argument to show that the quadrant probability for the bivariate normal distribution can be generalized to the case of all elliptical distributions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 230-231
Author(s):  
Sunday O Peters ◽  
Mahmut Sinecan ◽  
Kadir Kizilkaya ◽  
Milt Thomas

Abstract This simulation study used actual SNP genotypes on the first chromosome of Brangus beef cattle to simulate 0.50 genetically correlated two traits with heritabilities of 0.25 and 0.50 determined either by 50, 100, 250 or 500 QTL and then aimed to compare the accuracies of genomic prediction from bivariate linear and artificial neural network with 1 to 10 neurons models based on G genomic relationship matrix. QTL effects of 50, 100, 250 and 500 SNPs from the 3361 SNPs of 719 animals were sampled from a bivariate normal distribution. In each QTL scenario, the breeding values (Σgijβj) of animal i for two traits were generated by using genotype (gij) of animal i at QTL j and the effects (βj) of QTL j from a bivariate normal distribution. Phenotypic values of animal i for traits were generated by adding residuals from a bivariate normal distribution to the breeding values of animal i. Genomic predictions for traits were carried out by bivariate Feed Forward MultiLayer Perceptron ANN-1–10 neurons and linear (GBLUP) models. Three sets of SNP panels were used for genomic prediction: only QTL genotypes (Panel1), all SNP markers, including the QTL (Panel2), and all SNP markers, excluding the QTL (Panel3). Correlations from 10-fold cross validation for traits were used to assess predictive ability of bivariate linear (GBLUP) and artificial neural network models based on 4 QTL scenarios with 3 Panels of SNP panels. Table 1 shows that the trait with high heritability (0.50) resulted in higher correlation than the trait with low heritability (0.25) in bivariate linear (GBLUP) and artificial neural network models. However, bivariate linear (GBLUP) model produced higher correlation than bivariate neural network. Panel1 performed the best correlations for all QTL scenarios, then Panel2 including QTL and SNP markers resulted in better prediction than Panel3.


1962 ◽  
Vol 16 (77) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Author's Summary ◽  
G. W. Rosenthal ◽  
J. J. Rodden

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document