scholarly journals 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) vs Ringer's lactate preloading before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: the randomized, double-blind, multicentre CAESAR trial ‡

2014 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.J. Mercier ◽  
P. Diemunsch ◽  
A.-S. Ducloy-Bouthors ◽  
A. Mignon ◽  
M. Fischler ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 460-464
Author(s):  
Devyani Desai ◽  
Bhoomika Kalarthi

: Currently phenylephrine is a preferred 1 line vasopressor for maintenance of blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia, may be associated with reflex bradycardia and decreased cardiac output, posing risk to mother or foetus. Norepinephrine may be an useful alternative as being potent alpha with weak beta adrenergic agonist activity. : This study compared the effectiveness of prophylactic and treatment boluses of norepinephrine and phenylephrine to maintain systolic blood pressure at or above 80% of baseline value during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery with the primary aim to compare cardiac output. Secondary aims were total doses of study drug required, neonatal outcome and perioperative complications.: Total 100, term pregnant women with ASA status II undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia were enrolled in this prospective, double blind controlled study. Patients were randomized to receive prophylactic bolus dose of norepinephrine (6 µg) or phenylephrine (100 µg) immediately after spinal anaesthesia. Systolic blood pressure, cardiac output and heart rate were monitored. Intermittent bolus doses were repeated whenever required. Student ‘t’ test and chi square test were used for analysing the data. : Both the drugs were able to maintain the systolic blood pressure ≥ 80% of baseline (p=0.356). Significant difference observed in cardiac output while comparing both the groups from 3 to 15 minutes after spinal anesthesia (p=0.014). The incidence of bradycardia was lower in norepinephrine group as compared to phenylephrine group (P=0.018). : Norepinephrine is as effective as phenylephrine for maintenance of blood pressure after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery with stable heart rate and cardiac output.


1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. G. Pavy ◽  
D. R. Gambling ◽  
P. M. Merrick ◽  
M. J. Douglas

This double-blind, randomized study was designed to evaluate the use of indomethacin (Indocid®, MSD) following caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia. Thirty ASA I-II women presenting for elective caesarean were recruited. Spinal anaesthesia was performed in a standard manner using hyperbaric bupivacaine, fentanyl and morphine. At the completion of surgery, subjects were administered two rectal suppositories, followed by 12-hourly suppositories for six doses (three days). The study group received 100 mg indomethacin suppositories and controls were given placebo (Anusol®). Data collected included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and with movement, VAS scores for nausea and itch, and analgesic use. Demographic data were similar in the two groups. Median time to first analgesia (TTFA) was nine hours in the control group v. 39.5 hours in the indomethacin group (P<0.003). Additional analgesic requests throughout the postoperative period were less in women who received indomethacin: 4 v 11 (P<0.001). Women who received indomethacin had significantly less pain on the first postoperative day, especially on movement: mean VAS 1.4 v. 5.1 (P<0.00001). There were no reported adverse neonatal or maternal effects from the use of indomethacin. Rectal indomethacin use following caesarean delivery leads to significantly improved pain relief compared with placebo. The combination of spinal morphine and rectal indomethacin leads to high-quality postoperative analgesia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document