scholarly journals 1254 Virtual Fracture Clinic Management of Little (5th) Metacarpal Neck Fractures; a Safe and Feasible Option?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Townley ◽  
M Flatman ◽  
A Hoyle ◽  
G Eastwood
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Patient Contact ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Clinic Attendance ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Clinic Management ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Feasible Option ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

Abstract Aim To determine the safety and efficacy of a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) in managing little metacarpal neck fractures. Method Retrospective review of consecutive little MC neck fractures presenting to the ED June-December 2020 and subsequently referred on to VFC. Patient demographics and clinic outcomes were reviewed using electronic patient records and radiographs. Results Fifty patients were identified (Male:Female 37:13; mean age 26 years, range 3-89 years). Of these, 41/50 were discharged directly following VFC advice, with no adverse event. The remaining 9/50 had a face-to-face Fracture Clinic review due to safeguarding concerns (2), concurrent neck of fourth MC fracture (2), concerns regarding fracture pattern (4), and an unclear indication (1). These 9/50 were discharged after single review, with no adverse events to date. Conclusions Our data suggest that VFC review of patients with little MC neck fractures is a safe and feasible means of patient care which has the potential to reduce the requirement of face-to-face patient contact during the Covid-19 pandemic and reduce fracture clinic attendance. We suggest the routine incorporation of a Virtual Fracture Clinic for these hand injuries. Further work is needed to formally investigate associated patient satisfaction and the application of this approach to other trauma presentations.

341 Alder Hey Experience of Paediatric Virtual Fracture Clinic During The COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Stead ◽  
M Ashraf ◽  
S Gandham ◽  
M Khattak ◽  
C Talbot
Keyword(s):  
Patient Contact ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Social Challenges ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Elbow Injuries ◽  
Rapid Transition ◽  
Clavicle Fractures ◽  
Alder Hey ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

Abstract Introduction The SARS-CoV2/COVID-19 pandemic represented an unprecedented emergency prompting a drive to minimise non-essential patient contact and the need for a virtual fracture clinic (VFC); an uncommon practice in paediatric units. Management of paediatric fractures requires a greater degree of vigilance to safeguard children. The current climate has created social challenges that theoretically increase the risk of harm and exploitation to children. This study investigates VFC in the management of paediatric fractures to determine the efficiency of such a process and the risk of safeguarding. Method A protocol was devised in affiliation with BSCOS for the immediate management and streamlining of paediatric fractures into VFC. We retrospectively audited 235 VFC consults over a 1-month period. Patient sex was roughly evenly distributed, and age ranged from 9 months to 16 years (mean 8.4 years). Results 42% of patients were recalled for a face-to-face (F2F) review (26% expedited), primarily for clinical assessment, plaster complaints and imaging requirements. 33% were discharged and 15% continued follow-up in VFC. All clavicle fractures were discharged. Forearm, hand, foot and elbow injuries were more likely to be discharged. Lower leg, upper arm and knee presentations more frequently required a F2F review. 2.3% of cases required safeguarding reviews. Conclusions Given the rapid transition to VFC without the use of triage we have determined a number of non-complex fractures safely managed and discharged via VFC. The low percentage of recall due to safeguarding concern highlights this may not be a barrier to the continuation of virtual care outside of the context of a pandemic.

scholarly journals 688 Rapid Implementation of Virtual Fracture Clinic During COVID 19 Reduces Both Face-To-Face Appointments and Facilitates Rapid Feedback and Education to Be Delivered to The Emergency Department

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Havenhand ◽  
L Hoggett ◽  
A Bhutta
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Prospective Data ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Return Rates ◽  
Acute Hospitals ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic ◽  
Improve Patient

Abstract Introduction COVID-19 has dictated a shift towards virtual clinics. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust serves over a million patients with a significant number of face-to-face fracture clinics. Introduction of a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) reduces hospital return rates and improves patient experience. The referral data can be used to give immediate monthly feedback to the referring department to further improving patient flow. Method Prospective data was collected for all referrals to VFC during March 2020. Data included referral diagnosis, actual diagnosis, referrers grade, and final outcome. Results 630 referrals were made to VFC. 347 (55%) of those referrals were directly discharged without the need for physical consultation. Of these 114 (32%) were injuries which can be discharged by the Emergency Department with an advice leaflet using existing pathways. Of the remaining discharges 102 (29%) were query fractures or sprains; and 135 (39%) were minor fractures; which needed only advice via a letter and no face to face follow up. Conclusions Implementation of VFC leads to a decrease in physical appointments by 55% saving 347 face to face appointments. The new system has also facilitated effective audit of referrals in order to further improve patient flow from the Emergency Department via feedback mechanisms and education.

scholarly journals Optimizing orthopedic trauma care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. A closed-loop audit of implementing a virtual fracture clinic and fast-track pathway in a Dutch level 2 trauma center

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000691
Author(s):  
Thijs H Geerdink ◽  
Dorien A Salentijn ◽  
Kristin A de Vries ◽  
Philou C W Noordman ◽  
Johanna M van Dongen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Waiting Time ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Closed Loop ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Orthopedic Trauma ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

BackgroundGuidelines concerning outpatient management of patients during the coronavirus pandemic required minimized face-to-face follow-up and increased remote care. In response, we established a virtual fracture clinic (VFC) review for emergency department (ED) patients with musculoskeletal injuries, meaning patients are reviewed ‘virtually’ the next workday by a multidisciplinary team, instead of routine referral for face-to-face fracture clinic review. Patients wait at home and are contacted afterwards to discuss treatment. Based on VFC review, patients with minor injuries are discharged, while for other patients an extensive treatment plan is documented using injury-specific care pathways. Additionally, we established an ED orthopedic trauma fast-track to reduce waiting time. This study aimed to evaluate the extent to which our workflow supported adherence to national coronavirus-related guidelines and effects on ED waiting time.MethodsA closed-loop audit was performed during two 4-week periods using predefined standards: (1) all eligible ED orthopedic trauma patients are referred for VFC review; (2) reached afterwards; and follow-up is (3) patient initiated, or (4) performed remotely, whenever possible. Total ED waiting time, time to review, time for review, and time after review were assessed during both audit periods and compared with previous measurements.ResultsDuring both audits, the majority of eligible ED patients were referred for VFC review (1st: n=162 (88.0%); 2nd: n=302 (98.4%)), and reached afterwards (1st: 98.1%; 2nd: 99.0%). Of all referred patients, 17.9% and 13.6% were discharged ‘virtually’ during first and second audits, respectively, while 45.0% and 41.1% of scheduled follow-up appointments were remote. Median total ED waiting time was reduced (1st: −36 minutes (p<0.001); 2nd: −33 minutes (p<0.001)). During the second audit, median ED time to review was reduced by −13 minutes (p<0.001), as well as time for review: −10 minutes (p=0.019).DiscussionIn line with national guidelines, our VFC review allowed time-effective review and triage of the majority of ED orthopedic trauma patients, supporting patient-initiated and remote follow-up, whenever possible. ED waiting time was reduced after implementing the VFC review and orthopedic trauma fast-track.Level of evidenceIV.

Virtual fracture clinic management of fifth metatarsal, including Jones’, fractures is safe and cost-effective

Injury ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 966-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kit Brogan ◽  
Simon Bellringer ◽  
Harold Akehurst ◽  
Christopher Gee ◽  
Nada Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effective ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Clinic Management ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

scholarly journals 1295 Virtual Fracture Clinic: An Audit of Referral Quality and Service Effectiveness

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Beoku-Betts ◽  
A Prodromidis ◽  
A Nazar ◽  
D Sharma ◽  
S Barton
Keyword(s):  
Patient Discharge ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Telephone Support ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Service Effectiveness ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Clinic Efficiency ◽  
Standard Set ◽  
Patient Advice ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

Abstract Aim Assessment of referral quality to the virtual fracture clinic (VFC) at the Liverpool University Hospital foundation trust compared to the standards set out by the Glasgow virtual fracture clinic pathway. As a secondary aim the effectiveness of the VFC in diverting patients not requiring further clinical management away from face-to-face specialist physical fracture clinics (PFC) was assessed. Method Outcomes of 1st attendances were collected for standard PFC's before the implementation of the VFC at our centre. This data was comparatively analysed to the outcomes of 1st ‘attendances' of VFCs post-service implementation. To assess VFC referral quality fracture type was recorded and compared to the standard set out by the Glasgow virtual fracture pathway which states that a selection of simple stable fractures should be discharged from ED directly with patient advice and telephone support. Results We analysed 529 PFC first attendances and 402 VFC first attendances. We saw a variety of simples stable fractures (21%) in the VCF including: Distal radial, Fifth metatarsal, Minor radial head, Fifth metacarpal, Mallet finger, which could have been managed with direct ED discharge and telephone support. 19.4% of PFC attendance resulted in discharge without a change in management as compared to 22.1% of 1st attendances for the VFC. Conclusions The VFC clinic has shown itself as an effective service in re-directing patients from face-to-face appointments, evidenced by the comparative rates of patient discharge on first attendance. This study has laid the foundation for improving referral quality to the VFC. Collaborative efforts between Orthopaedics and ED could improve VFC clinic efficiency further.

Standardised virtual fracture clinic management of Achilles tendon ruptures is safe and reproducible

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 782-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alastair Robertson ◽  
Charles Godavitarne ◽  
Simon Bellringer ◽  
Enis Guryel ◽  
Felicity Auld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Clinic Management ◽  
Tendon Ruptures ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

scholarly journals One and done? Outcomes from 3961 patients managed via a virtual fracture clinic pathway for paediatric fractures

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jim Kennedy ◽  
Carol Blackburn ◽  
Michael Barrett ◽  
Patrick O’Toole ◽  
David Moore
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Paediatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

Purpose The aim of this paper is to describe our experience with a virtual fracture management pathway in the setting of a paediatric trauma service. Methods All patients referred to the virtual fracture clinic service from the Paediatric Emergency Department (PED) were prospectively collected. Outcome data of interest (patients discharged, referred for urgent operative treatment, referred back to emergency department for further evaluation, referred for face-to-face clinical assessment and all patients who re-presented on an unplanned basis for further management of the index injury) were compiled and collated. Cost analysis was performed using established costing for a virtual fracture clinic within the Irish Healthcare System. Results There were a total of 3961 patients referred to the virtual fracture clinic from the PED. Of these, 70% (n = 2776) were discharged. In all, 26% (n = 1033) were referred to a face-to-face appointment. Of discharged patients, 7.5% (n = 207) required an unplanned face-to-face evaluation. A total of 0.1% (n = 3) subsequently required operative treatment relating to their index injury. Implementation of the virtual fracture clinic model generated calculated savings of €254 120. Conclusion This prospective evaluation has demonstrated that a virtual fracture clinic pathway for minor paediatric trauma is safe, effective and brings significant cost savings. Level of Evidence II

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document