341 Alder Hey Experience of Paediatric Virtual Fracture Clinic During The COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Stead ◽  
M Ashraf ◽  
S Gandham ◽  
M Khattak ◽  
C Talbot
Keyword(s):  
Patient Contact ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Social Challenges ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Elbow Injuries ◽  
Rapid Transition ◽  
Clavicle Fractures ◽  
Alder Hey ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

Abstract Introduction The SARS-CoV2/COVID-19 pandemic represented an unprecedented emergency prompting a drive to minimise non-essential patient contact and the need for a virtual fracture clinic (VFC); an uncommon practice in paediatric units. Management of paediatric fractures requires a greater degree of vigilance to safeguard children. The current climate has created social challenges that theoretically increase the risk of harm and exploitation to children. This study investigates VFC in the management of paediatric fractures to determine the efficiency of such a process and the risk of safeguarding. Method A protocol was devised in affiliation with BSCOS for the immediate management and streamlining of paediatric fractures into VFC. We retrospectively audited 235 VFC consults over a 1-month period. Patient sex was roughly evenly distributed, and age ranged from 9 months to 16 years (mean 8.4 years). Results 42% of patients were recalled for a face-to-face (F2F) review (26% expedited), primarily for clinical assessment, plaster complaints and imaging requirements. 33% were discharged and 15% continued follow-up in VFC. All clavicle fractures were discharged. Forearm, hand, foot and elbow injuries were more likely to be discharged. Lower leg, upper arm and knee presentations more frequently required a F2F review. 2.3% of cases required safeguarding reviews. Conclusions Given the rapid transition to VFC without the use of triage we have determined a number of non-complex fractures safely managed and discharged via VFC. The low percentage of recall due to safeguarding concern highlights this may not be a barrier to the continuation of virtual care outside of the context of a pandemic.

scholarly journals 688 Rapid Implementation of Virtual Fracture Clinic During COVID 19 Reduces Both Face-To-Face Appointments and Facilitates Rapid Feedback and Education to Be Delivered to The Emergency Department

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Havenhand ◽  
L Hoggett ◽  
A Bhutta
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Prospective Data ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Return Rates ◽  
Acute Hospitals ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic ◽  
Improve Patient

Abstract Introduction COVID-19 has dictated a shift towards virtual clinics. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust serves over a million patients with a significant number of face-to-face fracture clinics. Introduction of a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) reduces hospital return rates and improves patient experience. The referral data can be used to give immediate monthly feedback to the referring department to further improving patient flow. Method Prospective data was collected for all referrals to VFC during March 2020. Data included referral diagnosis, actual diagnosis, referrers grade, and final outcome. Results 630 referrals were made to VFC. 347 (55%) of those referrals were directly discharged without the need for physical consultation. Of these 114 (32%) were injuries which can be discharged by the Emergency Department with an advice leaflet using existing pathways. Of the remaining discharges 102 (29%) were query fractures or sprains; and 135 (39%) were minor fractures; which needed only advice via a letter and no face to face follow up. Conclusions Implementation of VFC leads to a decrease in physical appointments by 55% saving 347 face to face appointments. The new system has also facilitated effective audit of referrals in order to further improve patient flow from the Emergency Department via feedback mechanisms and education.

scholarly journals 1254 Virtual Fracture Clinic Management of Little (5th) Metacarpal Neck Fractures; a Safe and Feasible Option?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Townley ◽  
M Flatman ◽  
A Hoyle ◽  
G Eastwood
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Patient Contact ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Clinic Attendance ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Clinic Management ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Feasible Option ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

Abstract Aim To determine the safety and efficacy of a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) in managing little metacarpal neck fractures. Method Retrospective review of consecutive little MC neck fractures presenting to the ED June-December 2020 and subsequently referred on to VFC. Patient demographics and clinic outcomes were reviewed using electronic patient records and radiographs. Results Fifty patients were identified (Male:Female 37:13; mean age 26 years, range 3-89 years). Of these, 41/50 were discharged directly following VFC advice, with no adverse event. The remaining 9/50 had a face-to-face Fracture Clinic review due to safeguarding concerns (2), concurrent neck of fourth MC fracture (2), concerns regarding fracture pattern (4), and an unclear indication (1). These 9/50 were discharged after single review, with no adverse events to date. Conclusions Our data suggest that VFC review of patients with little MC neck fractures is a safe and feasible means of patient care which has the potential to reduce the requirement of face-to-face patient contact during the Covid-19 pandemic and reduce fracture clinic attendance. We suggest the routine incorporation of a Virtual Fracture Clinic for these hand injuries. Further work is needed to formally investigate associated patient satisfaction and the application of this approach to other trauma presentations.

scholarly journals Optimizing orthopedic trauma care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. A closed-loop audit of implementing a virtual fracture clinic and fast-track pathway in a Dutch level 2 trauma center

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000691
Author(s):  
Thijs H Geerdink ◽  
Dorien A Salentijn ◽  
Kristin A de Vries ◽  
Philou C W Noordman ◽  
Johanna M van Dongen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Waiting Time ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Closed Loop ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Orthopedic Trauma ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

BackgroundGuidelines concerning outpatient management of patients during the coronavirus pandemic required minimized face-to-face follow-up and increased remote care. In response, we established a virtual fracture clinic (VFC) review for emergency department (ED) patients with musculoskeletal injuries, meaning patients are reviewed ‘virtually’ the next workday by a multidisciplinary team, instead of routine referral for face-to-face fracture clinic review. Patients wait at home and are contacted afterwards to discuss treatment. Based on VFC review, patients with minor injuries are discharged, while for other patients an extensive treatment plan is documented using injury-specific care pathways. Additionally, we established an ED orthopedic trauma fast-track to reduce waiting time. This study aimed to evaluate the extent to which our workflow supported adherence to national coronavirus-related guidelines and effects on ED waiting time.MethodsA closed-loop audit was performed during two 4-week periods using predefined standards: (1) all eligible ED orthopedic trauma patients are referred for VFC review; (2) reached afterwards; and follow-up is (3) patient initiated, or (4) performed remotely, whenever possible. Total ED waiting time, time to review, time for review, and time after review were assessed during both audit periods and compared with previous measurements.ResultsDuring both audits, the majority of eligible ED patients were referred for VFC review (1st: n=162 (88.0%); 2nd: n=302 (98.4%)), and reached afterwards (1st: 98.1%; 2nd: 99.0%). Of all referred patients, 17.9% and 13.6% were discharged ‘virtually’ during first and second audits, respectively, while 45.0% and 41.1% of scheduled follow-up appointments were remote. Median total ED waiting time was reduced (1st: −36 minutes (p<0.001); 2nd: −33 minutes (p<0.001)). During the second audit, median ED time to review was reduced by −13 minutes (p<0.001), as well as time for review: −10 minutes (p=0.019).DiscussionIn line with national guidelines, our VFC review allowed time-effective review and triage of the majority of ED orthopedic trauma patients, supporting patient-initiated and remote follow-up, whenever possible. ED waiting time was reduced after implementing the VFC review and orthopedic trauma fast-track.Level of evidenceIV.

scholarly journals Quality and Evaluation Report: Virtual Fracture Clinic at Wythenshawe Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Warner ◽  
Anand Pillai
Keyword(s):  
Discharge Rate ◽  
Royal Infirmary ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Discharge Rates ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Rate Versus ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

 Background: Following its introduction at Glasgow Royal Infirmary in 2011, the Virtual Fracture Clinic model of managing outpatient musculoskeletal injuries has grown significantly in popularity. Wythenshawe Hospital introduced this model to their orthopaedic department in 2015. Aims: How do individual consultants vary in terms of discharge rate versus face-to-face follow up when reviewing cases in a Virtual Fracture Clinic? To assess patients’ level of satisfaction with the management of their injury under a Virtual Fracture Clinic System. Methods: A retrospective study of a cohort of patients over 12 months from 11th May 2017 to 11th May 2018. Data regarding the number of patients reviewed in Virtual Fracture Clinic during this time was collected and the numbers of patients discharged or recalled for follow up analysed. A telephone questionnaire based on the NHS Friends and Family Test was collected from 50 patients within this cohort to assess overall satisfaction with their care. Results: 3361 patients were referred to virtual fracture clinic during the inclusion period. The mean percentage of cases discharged from virtual fracture clinic is 30.4% with a median of 30.5%. The rates of discharge ranged from Consultant G at 13% to Consultant K at 39%. 88% of patients would recommend this service to their friends and family and 80% would rate the service at the level of good or excellent. Conclusion: A virtual fracture clinic model has been successfully implemented at Wythenshawe saving approximately 1157 appointments in 12 months. There is significant variation in discharge rates between consultants which appears to be influenced by the number of patients seen. Individual factors which affect this require further investigation. Patients are very satisfied with their care through the Virtual Fracture Clinic at Wythenshawe Hospital and an overwhelming majority would recommend this to others.

scholarly journals 1518 The Use of OrthoPathway, Decision Support Software, To Reduce Variation in Practice, Optimise Patient Care and Reduce Face-To-Face Appointments in Trauma and Orthopaedics

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Jones ◽  
W Griffiths-Jones
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Web Application ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Musculoskeletal Problems

Abstract Introduction Musculoskeletal problems account for 3.5million Emergency Department attendances annually. Front-line staff are under pressure, faced with complex decisions with limited supportive tools. Without adequate support there is greater variation in practice, poor patient outcomes, longer Emergency Department stays and unnecessary follow-up. OrthoPathway is a web application that enables the production of editable decision support pathways. We have published over 50 Consultant designed, locally approved, interactive pathways. Patient-facing staff can use these to follow national guidelines, by answering questions to establish appropriate treatments. Method New and follow-up fracture clinic patients were audited over a one-week period. Clinic letters and clerking documents were analysed to identify the diagnosis and management plan. From information and radiographs available OrthoPathway was used to generate a management plan, used as the audit standard. Results 78 new patients and 83 follow-up patients were seen in fracture clinic over a one-week period. Clinical pathways were available on OrthoPathway for 42% of new patients and 40% of follow-up patients. Variation in practice was seen in 42% of new patients and 59% of follow-up patients. The associated saving in appointments was 11 and 21 and in the new and follow-up patients, respectively. Conclusions We have shown that OrthoPathway has the potential to reduce face-to-face appointments by 20%, with its current utilisation. Through the deployment of a full set of pathways we anticipated a reduction of greater than 40%, which is particularly pertinent given the current COVID-19 pandemic. This highlights the benefits of Consultant approved decision support pathways published on OrthoPathway.

scholarly journals 1295 Virtual Fracture Clinic: An Audit of Referral Quality and Service Effectiveness

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Beoku-Betts ◽  
A Prodromidis ◽  
A Nazar ◽  
D Sharma ◽  
S Barton
Keyword(s):  
Patient Discharge ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Telephone Support ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Service Effectiveness ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Clinic Efficiency ◽  
Standard Set ◽  
Patient Advice ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

Abstract Aim Assessment of referral quality to the virtual fracture clinic (VFC) at the Liverpool University Hospital foundation trust compared to the standards set out by the Glasgow virtual fracture clinic pathway. As a secondary aim the effectiveness of the VFC in diverting patients not requiring further clinical management away from face-to-face specialist physical fracture clinics (PFC) was assessed. Method Outcomes of 1st attendances were collected for standard PFC's before the implementation of the VFC at our centre. This data was comparatively analysed to the outcomes of 1st ‘attendances' of VFCs post-service implementation. To assess VFC referral quality fracture type was recorded and compared to the standard set out by the Glasgow virtual fracture pathway which states that a selection of simple stable fractures should be discharged from ED directly with patient advice and telephone support. Results We analysed 529 PFC first attendances and 402 VFC first attendances. We saw a variety of simples stable fractures (21%) in the VCF including: Distal radial, Fifth metatarsal, Minor radial head, Fifth metacarpal, Mallet finger, which could have been managed with direct ED discharge and telephone support. 19.4% of PFC attendance resulted in discharge without a change in management as compared to 22.1% of 1st attendances for the VFC. Conclusions The VFC clinic has shown itself as an effective service in re-directing patients from face-to-face appointments, evidenced by the comparative rates of patient discharge on first attendance. This study has laid the foundation for improving referral quality to the VFC. Collaborative efforts between Orthopaedics and ED could improve VFC clinic efficiency further.

The virtual fracture clinic: Reducing unnecessary review of clavicle fractures

Injury ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 720-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Bhattacharyya ◽  
Prem Ruben Jayaram ◽  
Robin Holliday ◽  
Paul Jenkins ◽  
Iain Anthony ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Clavicle Fractures ◽  
Virtual Fracture Clinic

scholarly journals 1452 How Did We Nose? COVID Adaptation of Our Nasal Fracture Service

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kumaresan ◽  
H Jones
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Patient Contact ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Nasal Fracture ◽  
History Of ◽  
Telephone Calls ◽  
Nasal Fractures ◽  
Functional Problems

Abstract Introduction Nasal fractures are a common ENT emergency that present to ED typically with a history of trauma. They can leave behind functional problems with breathing and can be cosmetically very deforming. For this reason, they need to be managed appropriately by the specialist team. In UHS, Southampton Hospital these patients were initially followed up by Care UK but during COVID, in order to minimise patient contact we came up with a modified patient initiated follow up pathway. (PIFU) Method Based on commonly agreed departmental guidelines: We looked at the statistics from 2019 and compared it with data from August – October 2020 and reviewed all patients who presented via ED and GP to us with nasal fractures visa image and telephone review and face to face meetings over a 3-month period. Results Despite lower attendances in ED during months of lockdown we still had 48 patients in 3 months i.e., nearly 4 patients every week. 50% did not initiate follow up. Of the patients who initiated follow up a third required MUA of which one was under general anaesthesia. All patients were treated within 21 days. Conclusions Our modified management pathway is compliant with the guidelines despite some consultations via telephone calls and image reviews.

scholarly journals 649 COVID BOAST In Practice: Our Experience Implementing BOA Recommendations During the UK Coronavirus Pandemic Peak

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Hoyle ◽  
K Iqbal ◽  
J Henry ◽  
L Hughes ◽  
D Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Residual Deformity ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background In anticipation of the UK coronavirus pandemic peak, BOA published new pandemic-specific guidance (“COVID BOAST”) in April 2020. We describe our experience implementing this restructured T&O service in a busy DGH setting during the pandemic peak. Method A rapid retrospective audit was conducted of all patients presenting to our T&O service in April 2020, with particular emphasis compliance with COVID BOAST. Results Our service conducted 511 outpatient reviews, and 95 operative procedures. 94% of outpatients were treated non-operatively. We provided telephone appointments to 12.8% of follow-up patients, and 39% of new patients. 82% of patients were treated with removable casts/splints/boots. 23% of patients were discharged direct from VFC or after one face-to-face fracture clinic review. Residual deformity was consciously accepted in 13% of patients. Theatre throughput fell significantly due to pandemic precautions however, femoral neck fracture volumes remained constant. Conclusions We demonstrate broad compliance with COVID BOAST guidance. The majority of patients were treated non-operatively, including conscious acceptance of residual deformity. Our pre-existing VFC allowed us to provide a significant number of telephone consultations, although despite the practice shift towards removable splintage, face-to-face consultations were required for clinical and/or radiological assessment. The impact of increased conservative management on patients’ long-term outcomes needs further evaluation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document