89 Do Corticosteroid and Local Anaesthetic Hip Injections Administered Proximal or Distal to The Zona Orbicularis Have an Effect on Patient Satisfaction?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Watts ◽  
W Watkinson ◽  
D Shaw

Abstract Aim Pubofemoral and ischiofemoral ligaments blend to make zona orbicularis. Zonaorbicularis has been suggested to force fluid from peripheral compartment to central compartment in unidirectional flow. This study aims to assess whether injection of corticosteroid with local anaesthetic injected either proximal or distal to the zona orbicularis has effect on patient satisfaction. Method This retrospective study investigated consecutive patients undergoing ultrasound guided hip injections at a single centre in the UK between November 2018 and March 2019. Patients were identified using IMPAX© picture archiving and communications system. Radiographs were assessed to see if radiopaque dye and therefore corticosteroid and local anaesthetic had been injected proximal or distal to the zona orbicularis. Clinic letters were accessed on the electronic patient record and we recorded whether patients had pain relief at 24 hours and 2 weeks following hip injection. Results 133 Patients were identified during the study period, of which 40 were included. At 24 hours post-injection 72% of patients were satisfied and 28% were unsatisfied, for which there was 76% and 70% satisfaction for proximal and distal injections respectively (p = 0.63). At 2 weeks post-injection 45% of patients were satisfied and 55% of patients unsatisfied, for which there was 47% and 44% satisfaction for proximal and distal injections respectively (p = 0.9). Conclusions Overall patient satisfaction is high following hip corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection. No difference was found between injections proximal and distal to the zona orbicularis. Further research is needed to quantify the association between proximal and distal injections.

2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 445-453
Author(s):  
Priscila de Camargo Smolarek ◽  
Leonardo Siqueira da Silva ◽  
Paula Regina Dias Martins ◽  
Karen da Cruz Hartman ◽  
Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 430-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E Odoom ◽  
Georgina M Allen ◽  
David J Wilson

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aloka Samantaray ◽  
Mangu Hanumantha Rao ◽  
Chitta Ranjan Sahu

We aimed to show that a single preprocedural dose of either dexmedetomidine or fentanyl reduces procedural pain and discomfort and provides clinically acceptable sedation. In this prospective, double-blind study, sixty patients scheduled for elective surgery and requiring planned central venous catheter insertion were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg), fentanyl (1 μg/kg), or 0.9% normal saline intravenously over ten minutes followed by local anesthetic field infiltration before attempting central venous catheterization. The primary outcome measures are assessment and analysis of pain, discomfort, and sedation level before, during, and after the central venous catheter insertion at five time points. The median (IQR) pain score is worst for normal saline group at local anaesthetic injection [6 (4–6.7)] which was significantly attenuated by addition of fentanyl [3 (2–4)] and dexmedetomidine [4 (3–5)] in the immediate postprocedural period (P=0.001). However, the procedure related discomfort was significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group compared to fentanyl group in the first 10 min of procedure after local anaesthetic Injection (P=0.001). Fentanyl is more analgesically efficient for central venous catheter insertion along with local anaesthetic injection. However, dexmedetomidine has the potential to be superior to fentanyl and placebo in terms of providing comfort to the patients during the procedure.


1983 ◽  
Vol 59 (692) ◽  
pp. 399-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Rustin ◽  
M. D. Flynn ◽  
E. N. Coomes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document