257 The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health Associated Trauma, Admissions and Fractures at a London Major Trauma Centre

Abstract Aim Non-injury related factors have been extensively studied in major trauma and shown to have a significant impact on patient outcomes, with mental illness and associated medication use proven to have a negative effect on bone health and fracture healing. We report the epidemiological effect of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health associated Orthopaedic trauma, fractures, and admissions to our centre. Method We collated data retrospectively from the electronic records of Orthopaedic inpatients in an 8-week non-COVID and COVID period analysing demographic data, referral and admission numbers, orthopaedic injuries, surgery performed and patient co-morbidities including psychiatric history. Results here were 824 Orthopaedic referrals and 358 admissions (6/day) in the non-COVID period with 38/358 (10.6%) admissions having a psychiatric diagnosis and 30/358 (8.4%) also having a fracture. This was compared to 473 referrals and 195 admissions (3/day) in the COVID period with 73/195 (37.4%) admissions having a documented psychiatric diagnosis and 47/195 (24.1%) a fracture. 22/38 (57.9%) and 52/73 (71.2%) patients were known to mental health services, respectively. Conclusions Whilst total numbers utilising the Orthopaedic service decreased, the impact of the pandemic and lockdown disproportionately affected those with mental health problems, a group already at higher risk of poorer functional outcomes and non-union. The proportion of patients with both a fracture and a psychiatric diagnosis more than doubled and the number of patients presenting due to a traumatic suicide attempt almost tripled. It is imperative that adequate support is in place for vulnerable mental health patients, particularly as we are currently experiencing the “second wave” of COVID-19.

Download Full-text

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health associated trauma, admissions and fractures at a London major trauma centre

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England ◽

10.1308/rcsann.2020.7026 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 103 (2) ◽

pp. 114-119

Author(s):

D Hay ◽

MS Jamal ◽

K Al-Tawil ◽

A Petohazi ◽

V Gulli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Psychiatric Diagnosis ◽

Major Trauma ◽

Mental Health Problems ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Related Factors ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

The Impact

Introduction Non-injury-related factors have been extensively studied in major trauma and have been shown to have a significant impact on patient outcomes. Mental illness and associated medication use has been proven to have a negative effect on bone health and fracture healing. Materials and methods We collated data retrospectively from the records of orthopaedic inpatients in a non-COVID and COVID period. We analysed demographic data, referral and admission numbers, orthopaedic injuries, surgery performed and patient comorbidities, including psychiatric history. Results There were 824 orthopaedic referrals and 358 admissions (six/day) in the non-COVID period, with 38/358 (10.6%) admissions having a psychiatric diagnosis and 30/358 (8.4%) also having a fracture. This was compared with 473 referrals and 195 admissions (three/day) in the COVID period, with 73/195 (37.4%) admissions having a documented psychiatric diagnosis and 47/195 (24.1%) having a fracture. Discussion There was a reduction in the number of admissions and referrals during the pandemic, but a simultaneous three-fold rise in admissions with a psychiatric diagnosis. The proportion of patients with both a fracture and a psychiatric diagnosis more than doubled and the number of patients presenting due to a traumatic suicide attempt almost tripled. Conclusion While total numbers using the orthopaedic service decreased, the impact of the pandemic and lockdown disproportionately affects those with mental health problems, a group already at higher risk of poorer functional outcomes and non-union. It is imperative that adequate support is in place for patients with vulnerable mental health during these periods, particularly as we look towards a potential ‘second wave’ of COVID-19.

Download Full-text

The effects of a UK lockdown on orthopaedic trauma admissions and surgical cases

Bone & Joint Open ◽

10.1302/2633-1462.15.bjo-2020-0028.r1 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (5) ◽

pp. 137-143 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Matthew Hampton ◽

Matthew Clark ◽

Ian Baxter ◽

Richard Stevens ◽

Elinor Flatt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Major Trauma ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Hand Injuries ◽

Orthopaedic Trauma ◽

Nerve Injuries ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

The Uk ◽

The Impact

Aims The current global pandemic due to COVID-19 is generating significant burden on the health service in the UK. On 23 March 2020, the UK government issued requirements for a national lockdown. The aim of this multicentre study is to gain a greater understanding of the impact lockdown has had on the rates, mechanisms and types of injuries together with their management across a regional trauma service. Methods Data was collected from an adult major trauma centre, paediatric major trauma centre, district general hospital, and a regional hand trauma unit. Data collection included patient demographics, injury mechanism, injury type and treatment required. Time periods studied corresponded with the two weeks leading up to lockdown in the UK, two weeks during lockdown, and the same two-week period in 2019. Results There was a 55.7% (12,935 vs 5,733) reduction in total accident and emergency (A&E) attendances with a 53.7% (354 vs 164) reduction in trauma admissions during lockdown compared to 2019. The number of patients with fragility fractures requiring admission remained constant (32 patients in 2019 vs 31 patients during lockdown; p > 0.05). Road traffic collisions (57.1%, n = 8) were the commonest cause of major trauma admissions during lockdown. There was a significant increase in DIY related-hand injuries (26% (n = 13)) lockdown vs 8% (n = 11 in 2019, p = 0.006) during lockdown, which resulted in an increase in nerve injuries (12% (n = 6 in lockdown) vs 2.5% (n = 3 in 2019, p = 0.015) and hand infections (24% (n = 12) in lockdown vs 6.2% (n = 8) in 2019, p = 0.002). Conclusion The national lockdown has dramatically reduced orthopaedic trauma admissions. The incidence of fragility fractures requiring surgery has not changed. Appropriate provision in theatres should remain in place to ensure these patients can be managed as a surgical priority. DIY-related hand injuries have increased which has led to an increased in nerve injuries requiring intervention.

Download Full-text

The effects of a UK lockdown on orthopaedic trauma admissions and surgical cases

Bone & Joint Open ◽

10.1302/2046-3758.15.bjo-2020-0028.r1 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (5) ◽

pp. 137-143 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Matthew Hampton ◽

Matthew Clark ◽

Ian Baxter ◽

Richard Stevens ◽

Elinor Flatt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Major Trauma ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Hand Injuries ◽

Orthopaedic Trauma ◽

Nerve Injuries ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

The Uk ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

The impact of Major Trauma Centre (MTC) status on paediatric orthopaedic service delivery – 1 year after MTC status designation.

International Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.023 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 11 (7) ◽

pp. 566

Author(s):

Assad Farooq ◽

Ravindran Visagan ◽

Yaser Jabber ◽

Raj Bhattacharya ◽

Sally Tennant ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Service Delivery ◽

Major Trauma ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

Paediatric Orthopaedic ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

The impact of alcohol intoxication in patients admitted due to assault at an Australian major trauma centre: a trauma registry study from 1999 to 2009

Emergency Medicine Journal ◽

10.1136/emermed-2012-202076 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (5) ◽

pp. 390-393 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Michael M Dinh ◽

Kendall J Bein ◽

Susan Roncal ◽

Alexandra L C Martiniuk ◽

Soufiane Boufous

Keyword(s):

Major Trauma ◽

Trauma Registry ◽

Alcohol Intoxication ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Registry Study ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

Mental health problems in the general population during and after the first lockdown phase due to the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic: Rapid review of multi-wave studies

10.1101/2020.12.03.20243196 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Dirk Richter ◽

Steffi Riedel-Heller ◽

Simeon Zuercher

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Mental Health Problems ◽

Health Problems ◽

Rapid Review ◽

Care Utilization ◽

Related Factors ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Health Crisis ◽

General Populations ◽

The Impact

BackgroundThe SARS-Cov-2 pandemic and the lockdown response have increased mental health problems in general populations compared to pre-pandemic times. The course of mental health problems during and after the first lockdown phase has not yet been reviewed.MethodsWe conducted a rapid review of multi-wave studies in general populations with time points during and after the first lockdown phase. Repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal studies were included. The main outcome assessed was whether indicators of mental health problems have changed during and after the first lockdown phase. The study was registered with PROSPERO No. CRD42020218640Findings23 studies with 56 indicators were included in the qualitative review. Studies that reported data from pre-pandemic assessments through lockdown indicated an increase in mental health problems. During lockdown no uniform trend could be identified. After lockdown mental health problems decreased slightly.InterpretationAs mental health care utilization indicators and data on suicides do not suggest an increase in demand during the first lockdown phase, we regard the increase in mental health problems as general distress that is to be expected during a global health crisis. Several methodological, pandemic-related, response-related and health policy-related factors need to be considered when trying to gain a broader perspective on the impact of the first wave of the pandemic and the first phase of lockdown on general populations’ mental health.

Download Full-text

Management of multiple rib fractures-results from a Major Trauma Centre with review of the existing literature

10.21203/rs.3.rs-118238/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Debkumar Chowdhury ◽

P. Okoh ◽

H. Dambappa

Keyword(s):

Major Trauma ◽

Significant Proportion ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Rib Fractures ◽

Rib Fracture ◽

Analgesic Requirement ◽

Multiple Rib Fractures ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

The Impact

Abstract Introduction Rib fractures are amongst the most common fractures following major trauma presenting to the Emergency Department. It accounts for more than 15% of ED presentations (1) on a global scale. As the population ages the incidence of rib fractures also rises often following falls from a relatively small height being part of fragility fractures. The impact of rib fractures is even more significant in the patient with underlying chronic respiratory conditions.Aim To assess our current management of rib fractures at our trauma centreMethod We collected our data from the TARN Registry primarily focussing on patients with multiple rib fractures. The main components were the analgesic requirement of our patients. We also studied the number of rib fracture stabilisation procedures and the average number of ribs fixed.Results The data was collected retrospectively over a period of 12 months. There were 313 patients identified as having chest wall injuries. From the data, 41.9% (131) of patients were over the age of 65 years. A significant proportion of our patients 34.5% (108) were noted to have multiple rib fractures (>3 Ribs). It was noted that 3% (9) of the 313 patients required operations. The average of the patients included in the study was noted to be 61 years with an age range of 17-92 years.Conclusion The mainstay management of rib fracture is provision of adequate analgesia and the prevention of respiratory complications that can all stem from poor ventilatory function amongst other patient factors and injury patterns. Through the decades, surgical stabilisation has gained pace and has found its niche in the management of rib fractures.

Download Full-text

The impact of trauma centre designation on open tibial fracture management

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England ◽

10.1308/003588413x13511609957416 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 95 (3) ◽

pp. 184-187 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

J Stammers ◽

D Williams ◽

J Hunter ◽

M Vesely ◽

D Nielsen

Keyword(s):

Major Trauma ◽

Average Length ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Tibial Fractures ◽

Open Tibial Fractures ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

Fracture Management ◽

Before And After ◽

Trauma Networks ◽

The Impact

Introduction The British Orthopaedic Association/British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons guidelines for the management of open tibial fractures recommend early senior combined orthopaedic and plastic surgical input with appropriate facilities to manage a high caseload. The aim of this study was to assess whether becoming a major trauma centre has affected the management of patients with open tibial fractures. Methods Data were obtained prospectively on consecutive open tibial fractures during two eight-month periods: before and after becoming a trauma centre. Results Overall, 29 open tibial fractures were admitted after designation as a major trauma centre compared with 15 previously. Of the 29 patients, 21 came directly or as transfers from another accident and emergency deparment (previously 8 of 15). The time to transfer patients admitted initially to local orthopaedic departments has fallen from 205.7 hours to 37.4 hours (p=0.084). Tertiary transferred patients had a longer hospital stay (16.3 vs 14.9 days) and had more operations (3.7 vs 2.6, p=0.08) than direct admissions. As a trauma centre, there were improvements in time to definitive skeletal stabilisation (4.7 vs 2.2 days, p=0.06), skin coverage (8.3 vs 3.7 days, p=0.06), average number of operations (4.2 vs 2.3, p=0.002) and average length of hospital admission (26.6 vs 15.3 days, p=0.05). Conclusions The volume and management of open tibial fractures, independent of fracture grade, has been directly affected by the introduction of a trauma centre enabling early combined senior orthopaedic and plastic surgical input. Our data strongly support the benefits of trauma centres and the continuing development of trauma networks in the management of open tibial fractures.

Download Full-text

Implementing an integrated approach to self-management support in an acute major trauma therapy team: an improvement project

BMJ Open Quality ◽

10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000415 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. e000415 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Lucinda Hollinshead ◽

Fiona Jones ◽

Lucy Silvester ◽

Paul Marshall-Taylor

Keyword(s):

Educational Intervention ◽

Major Trauma ◽

Integrated Approach ◽

Trauma Centre ◽

Self Management ◽

Management Support ◽

Allied Health Professionals ◽

Improvement Project ◽

Major Trauma Centre ◽

The Impact

More patients now survive multiple trauma injuries, but the level of long-term unmet needs is high. Evidence shows self-management support can improve patients ’ confidence to manage these needs but traditionally this support starts post-hospital. Starting self-management support early could prepare patients and families for successful transitions from hospital. The skills and commitment of clinicians have been shown to contribute to the success or failure of self-management approaches. The aim of this project was to explore the feasibility of integrating self-management support in an acute major trauma setting by evaluating the impact of an educational intervention on clinicians’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviours regarding self-management support and identifying any barriers and facilitators to integrating self-management into daily practice. Two improvement cycles were carried out over a 1-year period involving 18 allied health professionals (AHPs) in an acute major trauma centre in London, UK. An educational intervention, ‘Bridges Self-Management Programme’ was modified for the setting. The impact was evaluated using (1) a clinician questionnaire to evaluate knowledge and attitudes; (2) case reflection forms and (3) peer review to observe interactions to integrate self-management support. Questionnaire data were summarised and pre-training and post-training scores compared; the qualitative data from written case reflections, verbal and written feedback from training and group discussions was described and analysed thematically. The result of two improvement cycles has shown it was feasible to improve AHP’s knowledge, attitudes and change behaviours regarding self-management support in the acute trauma setting, but difficult to sustain change beyond 6 months. Key barriers such as the pressure to discharge patients and support within the wider multidisciplinary team (MDT) were identified. Facilitators included the introduction of a new key-worker, to enable shared team approaches and paperwork to involve patients and families in goal setting and treatment planning. The main learning was to ensure sustainability mechanisms from the outset, engage the wider MDT in training, and integrate self-management language and principles into team processes.

Download Full-text