scholarly journals Peer Relationships of Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants: Predictors of Peer Entry and Peer Interaction Success

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Martin ◽  
Y. Bat-Chava ◽  
A. Lalwani ◽  
S. B. Waltzman
1986 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 691-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy R. Lederberg ◽  
Helena B. Ryan ◽  
Bonnie L. Robbins

Author(s):  
William G. Kronenberger ◽  
David B. Pisoni

Prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants (CIs) have about 2 to 5 times more risk for delays in specific domains of executive functioning (EF) than normal-hearing (NH) children, with about 25% to 40% of children with CIs showing delays in specific EF subdomains. This chapter reviews the rationale and evidence for two theoretical approaches to explaining this elevated risk for EF delay: language-focused approaches and biopsychosocial systems theories, such as the auditory neurocognitive model. Research supporting language-focused approaches, which attribute risk of EF delays entirely to language delays, has significant limitations. Furthermore, results from an extensive data set of EF outcomes in CI users are inconsistent with language-focused approaches. In contrast, biopsychosocial systems theories, which attribute risk for EF delay to a system of factors, including auditory experience, language, family environment/experiences, fluid intelligence, and psychosocial influences, provide the strongest evidence and potential for explaining EF delays and outcomes in children with CIs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S84-S88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S Harris ◽  
David B Pisoni ◽  
William G Kronenberger ◽  
Sujuan Gao ◽  
Helena M Caffrey ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 150 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunilla Preisler ◽  
Anna-Lena Tvingstedt ◽  
Margareta Ahlstrom

2002 ◽  
Vol 111 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 113-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda Cleary ◽  
David B. Pisoni

Forty-four school-age children who had used a multichannel cochlear implant (CI) for at least 4 years were tested to assess their ability to discriminate differences between recorded pairs of female voices uttering sentences. Children were asked to respond “same voice” or “different voice” on each trial. Two conditions were examined. In one condition, the linguistic content of the sentence was always held constant and only the talker's voice varied from trial to trial. In another condition, the linguistic content of the utterance also varied so that to correctly respond “same voice,” the child needed to recognize that Two different sentences were spoken by the same talker. Data from normal-hearing children were used to establish that these tasks were well within the capabilities of children without hearing impairment. For the children with CIs, in the “fixed sentence condition” the mean proportion correct was 68%, which, although significantly different from the 50% score expected by chance, suggests that the children with CIs found this discrimination task rather difficult. In the “varied sentence condition,” however, the mean proportion correct was only 57%, indicating that the children were essentially unable to recognize an unfamiliar talker's voice when the linguistic content of the paired sentences differed. Correlations with other speech and language outcome measures are also reported.


2005 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chii-Yuan Huang ◽  
Hui-Mei Yang ◽  
Yung-Ji Sher ◽  
Yi-Hui Lin ◽  
Jiunn-Liang Wu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document