Diagnostic feasibility of resting full-cycle ratio between systole and diastole to assess functional lesion severity of intermediate coronary artery stenosis

Abstract Background Recently, non-hyperemic physiologic indices have become widespread for evaluating physiological lesion assessment. The resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) is a unique non-hyperemic index which is calculated as the point of absolutely lowest distal pressure to aortic pressure during entire cardiac cycle. It is unclear whether RFR may detect functionally significant coronary stenosis that cannot be detected with other resting indices due to differences in the cardiac cycle. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of RFR based on cardiac cycle. Method This study was a prospectively enrolled observational study. A total of 156 consecutive patients with 220 intermediate lesions were enrolled in this study. The RFR was measured after adequately waiting for stable condition, while FFR was measured after intravenous administration of ATP (180mcg/kg/min). Lesions with FFR ≤0.80 were considered functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Results In all lesions, reference diameter, diameter stenosis, lesion length, RFR, and FFR were 3.0±0.7mm, 45±13%, 13.0±8.8mm, 0.90±0.09, and 0.82±0.10, respectively. Functional significance was observed in 88 lesions (40%) of all lesions. RFR systole was observed in 24 lesions (10.9%). Regarding to the coronary lesions, RFR systole was more frequent in non-LAD (LAD; 4.2%, left circumflex artery (LCX); 9.8%, and right coronary artery (RCA); 30.4%, respectively, p<0.018). RFR showed a significant correlation with FFR in both systole and diastole (R = 0.918, p<0.001, R = 0.733, p<0.001, respectively). The ROC curve analysis showed similar agreement in both systole and diastole (AUC: 0.881, p<0.001, AUC: 0.864, p<0.001, respectively). RFR provided a good diagnostic accuracy and no difference in both systole and diastole (79.6% and 87.5%, respectively, p=0.58). Conclusion RFR is feasible and reliable non-hyperemic index regardless of the difference of cardiac cycle to evaluate physiological lesion severity in daily practice. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

Differential impact of target vessel on the diagnostic performance of resting full-cycle ratio as non-hyperemic physiological assessment

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2480 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

H Takashima ◽

H Ohashi ◽

H Ando ◽

A Suzuki ◽

S Sakurai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Functional Significance ◽

Diagnostic Performance ◽

Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽

Stable Condition ◽

Artery Stenosis ◽

Lesion Length ◽

Target Vessel ◽

Roc Curve Analysis

Abstract Background Recently, wire-based resting indices have been recognized as gold standard for evaluating physiological lesion assessment. The resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) is a unique resting index which is calculated as the point of absolutely lowest distal pressure to aortic pressure during entire cardiac cycle. It is unclear whether the diagnostic performance of RFR for detecting functional coronary artery stenosis is similar in each coronary artery. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of RFR based on target coronary vessel. Method This study was a prospectively enrolled observational study. A total of 156 consecutive patients with 220 intermediate lesions were enrolled in this study. The RFR was measured after adequately waiting for stable condition, while FFR was measured after intravenous administration of ATP (180mcg/kg/min). Lesions with FFR ≤0.80 were considered functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Results In all lesions, reference diameter, diameter stenosis, lesion length, RFR, and FFR were 3.0±0.7mm, 45±13%, 13.0±8.8mm, 0.90±0.09, and 0.82±0.10, respectively. Functional significance was observed in 88 lesions (40%) of all lesions. RFR showed a significant correlation with FFR in overall lesions (r=0.774, p<0.001). The ROC curve analysis of RFR showed good accuracy for predicting functional significance (AUC 0.87, diagnostic accuracy 81%) in all subjects. Regarding each target vessel, there were similar and significant positive correlation between RFR and FFR (LAD; r=0.733, p<0.001, LCX; r=0.771, p<0.001, RCA; r=0.769, p<0.001, respectively). The prevalence of discordant between RFR and FFR was significantly different among 3 vessels (LAD 26%, LCX 12%, RCA 13%, respectively, p<0.05 for among 3 groups). Regarding the comparison of ROC curves according to lesion location, AUC was significantly lower in LAD than in LCX and RCA (LAD 0.780, LCX 0.947, RCA 0.926, p<0.01 for LAD compared to LCX, p<0.01 for LAD compared to RCA, respectively). Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy was significantly different according to target vessel (LAD 74%, LCX 88%, RCA 87%, respectively, p<0.05 for among 3 vessels). Conclusion RFR demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy for evaluating functional lesion severity. The diagnostic performance of RFR was different based on target vessel. RFR is a unique and useful resting index, and it may detect functionally significant coronary stenosis that cannot be detected with other resting indices in daily practice. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

P5633Diagnostic impact of resting full-cycle ratio as newly developed non-hyperemic indices for physiological lesion assessment

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz746.0577 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

H Takashima ◽

A Suzuki ◽

S Sakurai ◽

H Ando ◽

Y Nakano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery ◽

Entire Range ◽

Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽

Stable Condition ◽

Artery Stenosis ◽

Lesion Length ◽

Fractional Flow ◽

Gold Standard Method ◽

Flow Reserve ◽

Lesion Severity

Abstract Background Although fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a gold standard method to evaluate functional lesion severity in the catheterization laboratory, the need of hyperemic condition limits the widespread adoption of FFR. Recently, the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) which was newly developed resting indices was launched. It is unclear whether RFR as resting condition could assess physiological lesion severity of coronary artery stenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic impact of RFR compared to FFR in entire range of coronary artery stenosis. Method A total of 53 patients with 70 lesions were enrolled in this study. The RFR was measured after adequately waiting for stable condition, while FFR was measured after intravenous administration of ATP (180mcg/kg/min). Lesions with FFR ≤0.80 were considered functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Results In all lesions, reference diameter, diameter stenosis, lesion length, RFR, and FFR were 3.3±0.8mm, 44±12%, 14.6±7.2mm, 0.90±0.11, and 0.83±0.11, respectively. Functional significance was observed in 24 lesions (34%) of all lesions. The RFR showed a significant correlation with FFR (y = 0.800x + 0.239, R = 0.817, p<0.001). The Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a good agreement with a mean difference of 0.07 and a standard deviation of 0.06 between RFR and FFR across entire range of coronary artery stenosis. ROC curve analysis showed an excellent accuracy of RFR cut-off of ≤0.90 in predicting FFR ≤0.80 which had 78% sensitivity and 87% specificity (AUC 0.87, diagnostic accuracy 84%). Conclusion The RFR as newly resting indices is reliable to the assessment of functional lesion severity. This physiology-based approach may be a possible alternative method for FFR measurements in daily practice.

Download Full-text

Abstract 15484: Combined Coronary and Carotid Artery Involvement in a Caucasian Patient With Moyamoya Disease

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.15484 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Ahmed H Qavi

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery ◽

Moyamoya Disease ◽

Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽

Young Patients ◽

Artery Stenosis ◽

Medical Attention ◽

Caucasian Patient ◽

Left Circumflex Artery ◽

Cardiac Symptoms ◽

History Of

Introduction: Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a rare, progressive steno-occlusive disease of the intracranial carotid arteries. This is primarily a cerebrovascular disease and is mostly seen in young Japanese patients. We report a case of severe stenosis in the distal left circumflex artery (dLCx) in a non-Japanese patient with previously diagnosed MMD. Case presentation: A 33-year-old Caucasian female with history of MMD and 2 CVAs presented with chest pain for 2 days. Her only medication at home was aspirin. There was no history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or tobacco use. There was no family history of early CAD. Physical examination was positive for tachycardia but negative for carotid or femoral bruits. Neurologic examination revealed decreased touch sensation and diminished deep tendon reflexes on the left side. ECG demonstrated tachycardia with T wave inversions in leads III and ST depression in lead II. Acute CVA was ruled out with an MRI. Cardiac troponins were minimally elevated with peak of 0.12 ng/dl. An initial diagnosis of NSTEMI was made; patient was loaded with aspirin, clopidogrel and started on a heparin drip. Cardiac catheterization on the following day revealed single vessel CAD in the dLCx, with 80% stenosis and TIMI flow 2. A drug eluting stent was successfully placed in the dLCx. Angiogram post-stent placement showed optimal angiographic result with TIMI 3 flow. The patient was discharged home on dual antiplatelet therapy, statin, beta-blocker and ACE inhibitor. Discussion: MMD is thought to affect the coronary arteries from fibrous intimal thickening and histopathology of these coronary lesions show a homogenous, soft intimal proliferation with minimum lipid deposition and without substantial inflammatory cell infiltration. Although the combined involvement of carotid and coronary artery stenosis is rare, coronary involvement should be considered as one of the causes of ischemic heart disease in young patients with MMD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of combined involvement of carotid and coronary artery stenosis in a Caucasian patient with previously diagnosed MMD. It is imperative to educate patients with MMD about possible CAD so that they seek immediate medical attention if cardiac symptoms occur.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Guidezilla Extension Catheter for the Percutaneous Treatment of Complex Coronary Lesions

The Heart Surgery Forum ◽

10.1532/hsf.2709 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 23 (2) ◽

pp. E147-E150

Author(s):

Tao Chen ◽

Weihao Xu ◽

Yulun Cai ◽

Qi Wang ◽

Jun Guo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery ◽

Percutaneous Treatment ◽

Target Lesion ◽

Lesion Length ◽

Circumflex Artery ◽

Chronic Total Occlusions ◽

Left Circumflex Artery ◽

Coronary Lesions ◽

Procedural Success ◽

The Right

Background: The GuidezillaTM support extension catheter is designed to provide extra back-up support and efficient device delivery during complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), such as in treatment of severe calcification, tortuous chronic total occlusions (CTOs), and coronary anomalies. The aim of this study was to describe our initial experience with the GuidezillaTM extension catheter in the treatment of complex coronary artery lesions. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data from 165 PCI cases that used the GuidezillaTM guide extension catheter between March 2015 and August 2017. We collected patient clinical characteristics, target lesion characteristics, and procedural details. Results: Eighty-six percent of patients had complex Type C lesions, and 13.9% had Type B lesions. Lesion length ranged from 8 mm to 130 mm (≤ 20 mm, 15.4%; 20–40 mm, 35.8%; > 40 mm, 49.1%). The right coronary artery (59.2%) was the most common intervention vessel followed by the left ascending artery (30.6%) and the left circumflex artery (10.2%). CTO accounted for 38% of all lesions, followed by distortions (28%), heavy calcification (24%), proximal stent thrombosis (9%), and coronary artery origin anomalies (1%). A total of 142 patients underwent successful PCI using the GuidezillaTM extension catheter. The success rate was 86%. Conclusion: The GuidezillaTM guide extension catheter was an effective and safe technique in the transradial treatment of complex coronary lesions. Use of the GuidezillaTM guide extension catheter can shorten the procedure time and ensure overall procedural success with a reduced complication rate in cases where adequate progress using angioplasty devices has not been achieved.

Download Full-text

Abstract 10976: Diagnostic Ability of Contrast Media Induced Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess Functional Significance of Entire Coronary Artery Stenosis

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.10976 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Hiroaki Takashima ◽

Akiyoshi Kurita ◽

Yuki Saka ◽

Katsuhisa Waseda ◽

Hirohiko Ando ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery ◽

Contrast Media ◽

Functional Significance ◽

Entire Range ◽

Coronary Artery Stenosis ◽

Artery Stenosis ◽

Fractional Flow ◽

Diagnostic Ability ◽

Flow Reserve ◽

Lesion Severity

Introduction: Although fractional flow reserve (FFR) is helpful to evaluate functional lesion severity, the need of adenosine limits the widespread adoption of FFR. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that contrast media induced FFR (cFFR) with submaximal hyperemic condition could assess functional lesion severity of coronary artery stenos. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of cFFR compared to FFR in entire range of coronary artery stenosis. Methods: A total of 96 patients with 123 lesions were prospectively enrolled in this study. At first, we measured resting Pd/Pa ratio before inducing hyperemia. Then, cFFR was obtained after intracoronary injection of 6 ml of contrast media, while FFR was measured after intravenous adenosine triphosphate administration (180 mcg/kg/min). Lesions with FFR less than or equal 0.80 were considered functional significance of coronary artery stenosis. Results: In 123 lesions, reference diameter, diameter stenosis, resting Pd/Pa ratio, cFFR, and FFR were 2.7±0.8 mm, 47±12%, 0.91±0.10, 0.83±0.12, and 0.81±0.12, respectively. Functional significance was observed in 41% of all lesions. Both of resting Pd/Pa and cFFR showed strong correlations with FFR (r=0.861, p<0.001, and r=0.930, p<0.001, respectively). The correlation coefficient of cFFR was significantly superior to that of resting Pd/Pa ratio (p<0.05). This strong correlation between cFFR and FFR was shown in every coronary artery (LAD; r=0.924, p<0.001, LCX; r=0.923, p<0.001, and RCA; r=0.926, p<0.001, respectively). The Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a good agreement with a mean difference of -0.02 and a standard deviation of 0.05 between cFFR and FFR across entire range of coronary artery stenosis. ROC curve analysis showed an excellent accuracy of cFFR <0.84 in predicting functional significance (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 90%, specificity 89%, and diagnostic accuracy 89%). Moreover, the cFFR >0.89 was not corresponded to functional significance of entire coronary artery stenosis. Conclusions: The cFFR is an accurate, rapid and easy method in predicting functional significance of entire coronary artery stenosis. This physiology-based approach may be a possible alternative method for FFR measurements in daily practice.

Download Full-text