scholarly journals Primary percutaneous coronary intervention without stenting using excimer laser and manual thrombectomy in STEMI with duodenal ulcer perforation: a case report

Author(s):  
Hirokazu Yokoi ◽  
Takashi Yanagiuchi ◽  
Shunpei Ushimaru ◽  
Taku Kato

Abstract Background ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and peptic ulcer perforation are both medical emergencies that require urgent intervention. In case that these time-sensitive medical emergencies present concomitantly, it remains unclear which one should be treated first. Case summary An 85-year-old man with melaena, epigastric pain, and severe anaemia was transferred to our emergency department and diagnosed as having inferior STEMI based on electrocardiogram. Emergency coronary angiography (CAG) revealed severe stenosis with thrombus in the proximal right coronary artery. Immediate oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and abdominal computed tomography detected the presence of duodenal ulcer perforation. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without stenting using excimer laser coronary angioplasty and manual thrombectomy was performed under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance to avoid dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). After successful PCI, the perforated viscus was surgically repaired with a laparoscopic omental patch. On Day 7, endoscopic haemostasis treated the oozing of blood from the duodenal ulcer. On Day 21, follow-up CAG and IVUS showed residual stenosis with organized thrombus in the culprit lesion, in which a drug-coated stent was directly implanted. He was discharged with a favourable clinical course on Day 23. Discussion We judged that PCI should take precedence over the surgical repair of perforated duodenal ulcer in our case since STEMI was an immediate life-threatening compared to the perforated viscus which had no active exsanguination. Excimer laser coronary angioplasty with manual thrombectomy might be an adequate option to avoid stent deployment and subsequent DAPT in such complex scenarios.

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 657-660
Author(s):  
Mohsen Mohandes ◽  
Sergio Rojas ◽  
Cristina Moreno ◽  
Francisco Fernández ◽  
Mónica Fuertes ◽  
...  

Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001522
Author(s):  
Muhammad Jawad-Ul-Qamar ◽  
Harish Sharma ◽  
Vincenzo Vetrugno ◽  
Kully Sandhu ◽  
Peter F Ludman ◽  
...  

BackgroundExcimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) can be used as an adjunctive percutaneous coronary intervention treatment for challenging, heavily calcified lesions. Although previous studies have documented high rates of complication and restenosis, these predate the introduction of the smaller 0.9 mm laser catheter. As the coronary complexity has increased, there has been a renewed interest in the ELCA. This study investigates the indications, procedural characteristics, complications and outcomes of ELCA in a contemporary coronary interventional practice.MethodsThis single-centre study retrospectively analysed 50 patients treated with ELCA between January 2013 and January 2019.ResultsPatients had a mean age of 67.9±11.4 years with a male predominance (65.3%). 25 (50%) cases were performed in patients with stable angina. Failure to deliver the smallest available balloon/microcatheter was the most frequent indication in 32 (64%) cases for ELCA use. 30 (60%) of the procedures were performed via radial access. The 0.9 mm X-80 catheter was used in 41 (82%) of cases, delivering on average 9000±3929 pulses. ELCA-related complications included 2 coronary dissections and 1 perforation, all of which were covered with stents. No major complications could be directly attributed to the use of ELCA. There was one death and one case of stent thrombosis within 30 days of the procedure.ConclusionELCA can be performed safely via the radial approach with a 0.9 mm catheter with a high success rate by suitably trained operators. The low procedure-related complications with contemporary techniques make this a very useful tool for complex coronary interventions, especially for difficult to dilate lesions and chronic total occlusion vessels.


2001 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Sunew ◽  
Raj H. Chandwaney ◽  
David W. Stein ◽  
Sheridan Meyers ◽  
Charles J. Davidson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document