P923Association of intra-abdominal pressure changes with early diuretic response and improvement of dyspnea in patients with acute heart failure

Background: Poor natriuresis has been associated with a poorer response to diuretic treatment and worse prognosis in acute heart failure. Recommendations on how and when to measure urinary sodium (UNa) are lacking. We aim to evaluate UNa quantification after a furosemide stress test (FST) capacity to predict appropriate decongestion during acute heart failure hospitalization. Methods: Patients underwent an FST on day-1 of admission, and UNa was measured 2 hours after, dividing patients into low or high UNa based on the sample median value. A semiquantitative composite congestive score (CCS; 0–9) and NT pro-BNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) quantification were assessed before the FST and at day 5 after the FST. Results: Median UNa after FST in the 65 patients included was 113 (97–122) mmol/L. At day 5, a lower proportion of patients with a low UNa reached a 30% decrease in NT-proBNP levels (21 [66%] for low UNa versus 31 [94%] for high UNa; P =0.005) and an appropriate grade of decongestion (CCS<3) (20 [62%] for low UNa versus 32 [97%] for high UNa; P <0.001). A UNa>83 mmol/L 2 hours after FST had a 96% sensitivity to predict an NT-proBNP reduction ≥30% and 95% to predict a CCS<3 at day 5. Low UNa patients presented a lower cumulative diuresis and weight loss and presented more often with prolonged hospitalization, worsening heart failure, and readmission because of acute heart failure or death at 6 months. Conclusions: Low natriuresis after an FST identified patients at a higher risk of an inadequate diuretic response and an inappropriate decongestion. FST-guided diuretic treatment might help to improve decongestion, shorten hospitalizations, and to reduce adverse outcomes.

Download Full-text

P3534Optimal dosing of initial bolus of intravenous furosemide in acute heart failure: insights from REALITY-AHF

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.0398 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Y Matsue ◽

T Okumura ◽

K Kida ◽

S Oishi ◽

E Akiyama ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Acute Heart Failure ◽

Dose Group ◽

Standard Dose ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Loop Diuretics ◽

Recommended Dose ◽

Diuretic Response ◽

Initial Bolus

Abstract Background Although intravenous diuretics are a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with acute heart failure (AHF), optimal dosing of initial bolus of IV diuretics has not been well elucidated. Methods The initial IV bolus dose of furosemide and its association with outcomes were analyzed in 1290 AHF patients (median age, 81 years, 55% were male) derived from REALITY-AHF (Registry Focused on Very Early Presentation and Treatment in Emergency Department of Acute Heart Failure). The patients were divided into 3 groups; lower dose (lower than recommended dose, n=371), standard dose (same as recommended dose, n=807), and higher dose (higher than recommended dose, n=112) groups according to the recommended initial IV bolus furosemide dose derived from the maintenance loop diuretics dose (for those without taking oral loop diuretics or taking ≤40mg/day oral furosemide-equivalent loop diuretics, 20mg IV bolus furosemide; those on >40mg/day oral furosemide-equivalent loop diuretics, IV bolus furosemide at the same dose as oral loop diuretic dose). Outcomes were length of hospital stay, diuretic response (urine output achieved within 48 hours of admission per 40 mg furosemide-equivalent diuretics dose), and 60-day all-cause mortality. Results Median amount of first IV bolus furosemide dose were 10, 20, and 40 mg for lower, standard, and higher dose groups, respectively. After adjustment for other covariates, length of hospital stay was significantly longer by 2.6 days (p=0.018) in the lower dose group compared to the standard dose group, and there was no difference between the standard and high dose groups (p=0.221). Diuretic response within 48 hours of admission was significantly better in the lower dose group (beta coefficient: 244 mL, p=0.025) and significantly worse in the higher dose group (beta coefficient: - 1098 mL, p<0.001) compared to the standard dose group after adjustment for covariates. During 60 days of admission, 91 deaths were observed, and 60-day mortality was significantly higher in the higher dose group (HR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.49–5.26, p=0.001), but not in the lower dose group (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.67–2.08, p=0.571) compared to the standard dose group after adjustment for other prognostic factors. Conclusion Treatment with the recommended initial bolus of IV furosemide is associated with a shorter hospital stay compared to lower dose regimen and better diuretic response and better 60-day survival compared to higher dose regimen in patients with AHF. Acknowledgement/Funding This study was funded by The Cardiovascular Research Fund, Tokyo, Japan.

Download Full-text