A man with end-stage renal failure and uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism with repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve while avoiding patient–prosthesis mismatch

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1308-1308
Author(s):  
Ching-Hui Sia ◽  
Carlo Francisco Santos Gochuico ◽  
Ching Ching Ong ◽  
Lynette Li-San Teo ◽  
Edgar Lik-Wui Tay
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope Caughron ◽  
Devang Parikh ◽  
Zev Allison ◽  
Vaikom Mahadevan

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with predicted poor surgical outcomes due to end stage liver disease (ESLD) or end stage renal disease (ESRD), though there remains minimal data regarding outcomes and treatment strategy in this population. This study evaluates in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year outcomes after TAVR in a cohort of patients with ESLD and/or ESRD compared to a cohort without these comorbidities. Methods: We retrospectively compared 317 consecutive patients (N=37 ESLD and ESRD, N=286 without ESLD or ESRD) age >18 who underwent transfemoral or transssubclavian TAVR at University of California San Francisco Medical Center from August 1 st , 2014 to April 1 st , 2020. Results: The ESLD and ESRD group had younger patients (69.8±11.5 vs 79.1±9.8, p<0.01), a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (54.8% vs 28.3%, p<0.01), and higher STS-PROM scores (7.8±6.5 vs 4.7±3.9, p<0.01). Comparing the ESLD and ESRD to the control group, there were similar rates of in-hospital cerebrovascular events (3.2% vs 3.5%, p=0.94), vascular complications (6.5% vs 7.0%, p=0.91), and mortality (0.0%, vs 1.7%, p=0.46) with more bleeding events at discharge (9.7% vs 2.1%, p=0.01) and 1-year (29.2% vs 10.4%, p=0.01). Mortality rates were similar at 30-days (3.2% vs 2.1%, p=0.69) and 6-months (3.4% vs 2.8%, p=0.83), with a trend towards higher mortality in the ESLD and ESRD group at 1-year (16.7% vs 7.8%, p=0.15) from primarily noncardiac causes. Readmission rates were higher in the ESLD and ESRD cohort at 6-months (58.6% vs 27.2%, p<0.01) and 1-year (66.7% vs 40.6%, p=0.02). One patient received dual kidney-liver transplant, 1 patient received a liver transplant, and 8 patients remain on the transplant wait-list. Conclusion: Patients with ESLD and ESRD who underwent TAVR had higher rates of bleeding events and noncardiovascular readmissions with similar rates of mortality at discharge, 30-days, and 6-months when compared to patients without these comorbidities. This study suggests that TAVR may be a safe path to transplant in patients with liver or renal failure and aortic valve pathology, though additional studies are necessary to confirm these findings.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 360-366
Author(s):  
Sotiris C Stamou ◽  
Kai Chen ◽  
Taylor M James ◽  
Mark Rothenberg ◽  
Arvind Kapila ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 352 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vatsal Ladia ◽  
Hemang B. Panchal ◽  
Terrence J. O׳Neil ◽  
Puja Sitwala ◽  
Samit Bhatheja ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (07) ◽  
pp. 616-622
Author(s):  
Stephanie Voss ◽  
Marcus-André Deutsch ◽  
Johanna Schechtl ◽  
Magdalena Erlebach ◽  
Konstantinos Sideris ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is a growing use of cerebral protection devices in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to analyze if the use of these devices itself has an impact on the complexity and the risk of TAVR. Methods Between February 2016 and July 2017, 391 patients underwent transfemoral TAVR with Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R (n = 196) or Edwards Sapien 3 (n = 195). In 39 patients, the Claret Sentinel™ embolic protection device (CS-EPD) was used. Prospectively collected data were retrospectively analyzed, comparing fluoroscopy/operation time, amount of contrast used, vascular events, and postprocedural renal function in TAVR patients with (n = 39) and without (n = 352) CS-EPD. Results The CS-EPD was placed through the right radial (n = 35) or brachial (n = 4) artery. Procedural success rate defined as correct deployment and retraction of both filters was 94.9%. No device-related vascular complications occurred. TAVR patients with CS-EPD showed a significantly higher total operation time, total fluoroscopy time, and amount of used contrast (85.4 ± 39.3 vs. 64 ± 29.8 minutes, p = 0.002; 20.7 ± 9.3 vs. 13.7 ± 7 minutes, p ≤ 0.001; 133.7 ± 42.6 vs. 109.7 ± 44.5 mL, p = 0.001). Comparing the initial third of patients receiving a CS-EPD with the last third of CS-EPD cases, procedural time had decreased significantly (102.5 ± 34.9 vs. 67 ± 11.9; p = 0.002). There were no differences in postprocedural renal failure (p = 0.80). Conclusion Our data add evidence that the application of the CS-EPD is not associated with an additional risk for the patient. Although procedural time and amount of contrast are still higher when using the CS-EPD, there were no device-related complications or increased incidence of renal failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document