Using participatory action research to improve care coordination in Latin America healthcare networks

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Vitaloni ◽  
I Vargas ◽  
P Eguiguren ◽  
A Mogollón ◽  
I Samico ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Vitaloni ◽  
I Vargas ◽  
P Eguiguren ◽  
A Mogollón ◽  
I Samico ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M F M Mendes ◽  
G Cazarin ◽  
M M Hemetério ◽  
I C Samico ◽  
I Vargas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Problems related to care coordination are identified as challenges to the organization of health systems. In order to improve coordination, it is necessary to invest in interventions that promote collaboration between levels of care. The study analyzes factors influencing the implementation of the intervention joint meetings between levels of care, guided by participatory action research to improve clinical coordination from the perspective of actors involved in a public health care network in Brazil. Methods Qualitative descriptive-interpretative study carried out in the health network of a municipality in the northeast of Brazil. Ten interviews were conducted to managers and health professionals, members of local steering committee and focus group with primary care physicians and specialists participating in the intervention. Thematic content analysis was used; it generated categories from theoretical and emerging frameworks. Results The willingness of professionals and management support to participate of the intervention process emerge as fundamental factors. However, they are influenced by factors of the system, such as electoral period and management change and these reflected on the slowdown and instability in implementation process. In the health network, turnover of professionals and low trust between primary and specialized care were evidenced as challenges. However, the proactive role of local steering committee, driven by participatory strategy for development of the intervention, promoted reflections and decisions agreed between professionals and managers. This rebounded on adjustments to strengthen the intervention and improvements on knowledge and collaboration between levels. Conclusions analysis of factors contributes to reflection on changes in the context, adaptation of intervention over time and importance of the role of professionals. Such understanding becomes essential for sustainability and improvement of care coordination. Key messages Knowledge about factors that influence implementation of an intervention guided by participatory action research contributes to the development of strategies aimed at its sustainability. Contextual factors that hamper improvements implementation to coordination of care can be overcome through participatory strategies mobilizing health professionals and managers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
João Colares da Mota Neto

The article analyzes possibilities of convergence between popular education and participatory action research, taking as a reference the thought of the Brazilian pedagogue Paulo Freire and the Colombian social scientist Orlando Fals Borda. In particular, it examines these convergences in order to identify elements for the constitution of a decolonial pedagogy in Latin America. It is a research inserted in the field of the comparative history of Latin American social thought, using as primary sources several works of Paulo Freire and Orlando Fals Borda. The article defends the argument that the convergence between popular education and participatory action research is one of the most fruitful, creative and instigating intellectual contributions ever produced in Latin America, capable of pointing to a decolonial pedagogy that confronts intellectual colonialism, Pedagogical traditionalism and the authoritarianism of modern-colonial science. 


Author(s):  
Marjorie Mayo

Competing definitions of the concept of popular education are summarised, showing how the concept has been developed from different perspectives – and then applied in varying ways, in practice. This sets the context for the discussion of popular education as the basis for developing critical consciousness and social transformation. The chapter goes on to summarise the legacies of previous critical educationalists in USA and elsewhere, including the contributions of British experiences and approaches. These legacies have contributed to the thinking of the legendary Brazilian Paulo Freire and others, in the contemporary context. The final section explores the roots of participatory action research, as these have been developed in India, Latin America and elsewhere, in international development contexts.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Aurelio Saquet

This text was originally published in Portuguese (2019) in Brazil and was also published in Spanish (2020) in Mexico, with great circulation due to the breadth of the approach taken on the historical and dependent formation in Latin America, the possibility of building a popular and territorial paradigm of research and cooperation with the studied subjects (participatory action-research), the practical meanings of reciprocity and popular knowledge (urban and rural, peasants and artisans) and, finally, about our concrete experiences of decolonial and counter-hegemonic territorial praxis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Vargas ◽  
Pamela Eguiguren ◽  
Amparo-Susana Mogollón-Pérez ◽  
Isabella Samico ◽  
Fernando Bertolotto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Finding new strategies for care integration has become a policy priority for many fragmented health systems in Latin America. Although the implementation of interventions through a participatory action research (PAR) approach is considered to be more effective in achieving organizational change, its application is scarce. This study, part of the research project Equity-LA II, aims to analyze the impact of PAR interventions on care coordination across levels, and key aspects for their sustainability and transferability, from the stakeholder viewpoint in healthcare networks of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay. Different interventions were designed and implemented through a PAR process to improve communication and clinical agreement between primary care and secondary care doctors: joint meetings to discuss clinical cases and/or training; shared care guidelines; offline virtual consultations; a referral and reply letter; and an induction program. Methods A qualitative, descriptive-interpretative study was conducted in the healthcare network of each country. Focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with a criterion sample of participants: local steering committee (29) and professional platform members (28), other health professionals (49) and managers (28). Thematic content analysis was conducted, segmented by country and type of intervention. Results Informants highlighted that joint meetings based on reflexive methods contributed substantially to improving contextually relevant elements of clinical management coordination – communication in patient follow-up, clinical agreement, appropriateness of referrals – and also administrative coordination. The meetings, alongside the PAR process, also helped to improve interaction between professionals – knowing each other personally and mutual trust – thus fostering willingness to collaborate. The PAR approach, moreover, served to spread awareness of the coordination problems and need for intervention, encouraging greater commitment and interest in participating. No noteworthy contributions were identified in remaining interventions due to low uptake. A necessary condition for the sustainability and replicability was that PAR process had to be used appropriately in a favourable context. Conclusions Evidence is provided on the substantial contribution of interventions to improving locally relevant clinical coordination elements and professional interaction when implemented through an adequate PAR process (in terms of time, method and participation levels), a necessary condition for their sustainability and replicability.


2012 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Schurr ◽  
D. Segebart

Abstract. This paper deals with the challenges of doing fieldwork as a Western researcher in the "Global South" after the (feminist) postcolonial turn. Debates within developmental geography have addressed the politics of fieldwork, questions of positionality and collaborative, participatory ways to produce knowledge. We intend to enter this discussion to find constructive ways of conducting feminist postcolonial research. Drawing on our own experiences as German researchers and development practitioners in Latin America, we discuss the potential and limits of two central feminist postcolonial approaches in development research and practice: participatory (action) research and intersectionality. Our reflections aim to show how development research and practice may benefit from integrating feminist postcolonial approaches.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Vargas ◽  
P Eguiguren ◽  
A Mogollón-Pérez ◽  
I Samico ◽  
F Bertolotto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Finding new strategies for care integration has become a priority for many health systems in Latin America. Although the implementation of interventions through a participatory action research (PAR) approach is considered effective, its application in health services is scarce. Aim to analyse impact of PAR interventions on care coordination, and aspects for sustainability and transferability in public healthcare networks of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay. Methods A qualitative, descriptive-interpretative study was conducted in each healthcare network. Focus groups and individual semi-structured interviews were conducted to a criteria sample of Local Steering Committee (29), Platform of professionals (28), professionals (49) y managers (28). A thematic content analysis was conducted, segmented by country and themes. Different interventions were designed and implemented through a PAR process: joint meetings to discuss clinical cases and/or training; shared care guidelines; offline virtual consultations; a (back) referral form; and an induction program. Results Informants highlighted that joint meetings based on reflexive methods contributed substantially to improving contextually relevant elements of clinical coordination - communication in patient follow-up, clinical agreement, appropriateness of referrals - and administrative coordination. The meetings, alongside the PAR process, helped to improve interaction between professionals, fostering willingness to collaborate. No significant contributions were identified in the remaining interventions due to the low uptake. A necessary condition for the sustainability and replicability of the interventions was that the PAR process had to be used appropriately in a favorable context. Conclusions Evidence is provided on the significant contribution of interventions to improving locally relevant clinical coordination elements and professional interaction when implemented through an adequate PAR process. Key messages It contributes to fill the gap regarding the impact of PAR interventions on care coordination. A key aspect for impact and sustainability is an adequate use of PAR approach in a favourable context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document