scholarly journals GERIATRIC EDUCATION AND INTERDISCIPLINARY HEALTH CARE

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (Suppl_3) ◽  
pp. 402-402
Nursing Forum ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Given ◽  
Sandra Simmons

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 189-194
Author(s):  
Klara Lorinczi ◽  
Vanessa Denheyer ◽  
Amanda Pickard ◽  
Alice Lee ◽  
Diana R. Mager

Dysphagia is highly prevalent in patients with chronic neurological disorders and can increase the risk for comorbidities such as aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition. Treatment includes timely access to interdisciplinary health care teams with specialized skills in dysphagia management. A retrospective chart review (n=99 of 125 charts screened) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of referral criteria to identify and triage patients with suspected dysphagia to an ambulatory dysphagia clinic. Variables collected included demographic information (age), anthropometric information (body mass index [BMI], each patient’s sex), reason for referral, primary medical diagnosis, symptomatology (e.g., pneumonia, chest congestion), nutrition and swallowing interventions, clinic wait times, missed/cancelled appointments, and referring health care professional. The mean age and mean BMI ± standard deviation of patients reviewed were 68.7 years ± 18.4 years and 25.2 kg/m2 ± 6.7 kg/m2, respectively. Average clinic wait times were 158 days (13 to 368 days) for routine and 52 days (0 to 344 days) for urgent assessments (p<0.001). The most common reason(s) for referral was/were related to dysphagia (n=83), surgery (n=50), and/or gastrointestinal symptomatology (n=28); 80% to 90% of patients received varying diagnostic and treatment services for dysphagia. Development of effective referral criteria is critical to ensure that clients with dysphagia receive timely diagnostic, treatment, and nutrition interventions by interdisciplinary health care teams specializing in dysphagia.


2021 ◽  
pp. 016327872110408
Author(s):  
Hosung (Joel) Kang ◽  
Cecilia Flores-Sandoval ◽  
Benson Law ◽  
Shannon Sibbald

Teamwork among health care professionals has been found to improve patient outcomes and reduce burnout. Surveys from individual team members are often used to measure the effectiveness of teamwork performance, as they provide an efficient way to capture various constructs of teamwork. This allows evaluators to better understand team functioning, areas of strength, and to identify potential areas for improvement. However, the majority of published surveys are yet to be validated. We conducted a review of psychometric evidence to identify instruments frequently used in practice and identified in the literature. The databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant articles, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria for full assessment. Seven surveys were validated and most frequently identified in the literature. This review aims to facilitate the selection of instruments that are most appropriate for research and clinical practice. More research is required to develop surveys that better reflect the current reality of teamwork in our evolving health system, including a greater consideration for patient as team members. Additionally, more research is needed to encompass an increasing development of team assessment tools.


1998 ◽  
Vol 98 (9) ◽  
pp. A26 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Dahlke ◽  
K.N. Wolf ◽  
S.L. Wilson ◽  
M. Brodnik

1976 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 6???9
Author(s):  
Larry N. Swanson ◽  
Margaret T. Johnson ◽  
Bethany C. Lowe ◽  
Ernest L. Gurwich

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document