scholarly journals The development of a new accountability measurement framework and tool for global health initiatives

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 765-774
Author(s):  
Adriane Martin Hilber ◽  
Patricia Doherty ◽  
Andrea Nove ◽  
Rachel Cullen ◽  
Tunde Segun ◽  
...  

Abstract The Global Strategy for Women’s Children’s and Adolescents’ Health emphasizes accountability as essential to ensure that decision-makers have the information required to meet the health needs of their populations and stresses the importance of tracking resources, results, and rights to see ‘what works, what needs improvement and what requires increased attention’. However, results from accountability initiatives are mixed and there is a lack of broadly applicable, validated tools for planning, monitoring and evaluating accountability interventions. This article documents an effort to transform accountability markers—including political will, leadership and the monitor–review–act cycle—into a measurement tool that can be used prospectively or retrospectively to plan, monitor and evaluate accountability initiatives. It describes the development process behind the tool including the literature review, framework development and subsequent building of the measurement tool itself. It also examines feedback on the tool from a panel of global experts and the results of a pilot test conducted in Bauchi and Gombe states in Nigeria. The results demonstrate that the tool is an effective aid for accountability initiatives to reflect on their own progress and provides a useful structure for future planning, monitoring and evaluation. The tool can be applied and adapted to other accountability mechanisms working in global health.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Emma-Louise Anderson ◽  
Laura Considine ◽  
Amy S. Patterson

Abstract Trust between actors is vital to delivering positive health outcomes, while relationships of power determine health agendas, whose voices are heard and who benefits from global health initiatives. However, the relationship between trust and power has been neglected in the literatures on both international politics and global health. We examine this relationship through a study of relations between faith based organisations (FBO) and donors in Malawi and Zambia, drawing on 66 key informant interviews with actors central to delivering health care. From these two cases we develop an understanding of ‘trust as belonging’, which we define as the exercise of discretion accompanied by the expression of shared identities. Trust as belonging interacts with power in what we term the ‘power-trust cycle’, in which various forms of power undergird trust, and trust augments these forms of power. The power-trust cycle has a critical bearing on global health outcomes, affecting the space within which both local and international actors jockey to influence the ideologies that underpin global health, and the distribution of crucial resources. We illustrate how the power-trust cycle can work in both positive and negative ways to affect possible cooperation, with significant implications for collective responses to global health challenges.


2007 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Alappat ◽  
Gary Siu ◽  
Aaron Penfold ◽  
Brendan McGovern ◽  
Jennifer McFarland ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Ching Hung ◽  
Yanik J. Bababekov ◽  
Sahael M. Stapleton ◽  
Swagoto Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Song-Lih Huang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document