scholarly journals The frozen elephant trunk technique for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection: preliminary results

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 813-819
Author(s):  
Daisuke Kaneyuki ◽  
Kenji Mogi ◽  
Hiroyuki Watanabe ◽  
Masayoshi Otsu ◽  
Manabu Sakurai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Neurological Complications ◽  
Total Arch Replacement ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our goal was to determine the early and midterm outcomes after total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique compared to those of the conventional elephant trunk (ET) technique for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection. METHODS Between 2012 and 2019, a total of 49 patients had total arch replacement for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection. Patients were divided into the conventional ET (n = 17) and FET (n = 32) groups. The false lumen status was evaluated using enhanced computed tomography (CT) 1 week postoperatively. The diameter of the downstream aorta was evaluated annually using CT. The median follow-up period was 29 months. RESULTS Preoperative data and neurological complications were not significantly different in the 2 groups. The diameter and length of the ET prosthesis were significantly larger and longer in the FET group. The overall early mortality rate was 10.2% (5/49) with no differences between the 2 groups. The mean follow-up period was significantly longer in the conventional ET group. The rates of freedom from aortic events at 3 years were significantly lower in the FET group. At the level of the distal arch, postoperative false lumen patency was significantly lower and the follow-up aortic diameter was significantly smaller in the FET group. CONCLUSIONS The FET technique facilitates false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodelling at the distal arch level, with fewer adverse aortic events during the follow-up period with acceptable early outcomes; however, these findings are exploratory and require investigation.

scholarly journals Long stent graft for frozen elephant trunk repair in acute type A aortic dissection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaojie Wang ◽  
Wenqian Zhang ◽  
Jihai Peng ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Wenliu Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Thoracic Aorta ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Remodeling

OBJECTIVES: The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has become an important tool in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of long FET on spinal cord injury (SCI) and distal aortic remodeling after acute type A aortic dissection based on clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS: From January 2018 to November 2019, 158 patients [mean age 51.8 years (range 32 - 78 years), 88.6% male] with acute type A aortic dissection were treated by FET with 100 mm (n=113) or 150 mm (n=45) open hybrid stent graft prosthesis. Patients were divided into two groups according to the length of FET. The clinical and radiological outcomes of the patients were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Postoperative outcomes did not differ significantly: in-hospital mortality (9.7% vs 6.7%, P=0.758) and SCI (5.3% vs 2.2%, P=0.674). Aortic remodeling, which was evaluated by aortic diameter, true lumen diameter, false lumen diameter and the rate of false lumen complete thrombosis, was more positive in long FET group in the descending thoracic aorta during the follow-up period. At the abdominal level, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The long version of FET does not increase the risk of SCI in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. The application of long FET can achieve better results in terms of remodeling of the thoracic aorta in the short- and medium-term follow-up.

scholarly journals Repair of residual aortic dissections with frozen elephant trunk technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-425
Author(s):  
Mustafa Akbulut
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Replacement ◽  
Elephant Trunk Procedure

Background: In this study, we present our mid-term results of reoperation with the frozen elephant trunk procedure due to patent false lumen-related complications in patients previously undergoing supracoronary aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection. Methods: Between January 2013 and September 2018, a total of 23 patients (17 males, 6 females; mean age 51.5±9.7 years; range, 30 to 67 years) who underwent ascending aortic replacement due to type A aortic dissection and, later, frozen elephant trunk procedure for residual distal dissection were included. For diagnostic purposes and follow-up, computed tomography angiography was performed in all patients, and both re-entry and aortic diameters were evaluated. Echocardiography was used to evaluate cardiac function and valve pathologies. Results: The Ishimaru zone 0 (n=11, 47.8%), Ishimaru zone 1 (n=1, 4.3%), Ishimaru zone 2 (n=4, 17.4%), and Ishimaru zone 3 (n=7, 30.4%) were used for frozen elephant trunk stent graft fixation. The mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion was 223.9±71.2 min and 88.9±60.3 min, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 13%, while there was one (4.3%) aortic-related death and four (17.4%) re-interventions during follow-up. Conclusion: Early repair should be considered in the presence of persistent dissections due to alarmingly high mortality rates of reoperations. Reoperation with the frozen elephant trunk procedure has acceptable results and the decision of the procedure to be performed should be based on preoperative risk factors of the patient.

scholarly journals Long Stent Graft for Frozen Elephant Trunk Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaojie Wang ◽  
Wenqian Zhang ◽  
Jihai Peng ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Guangtian Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Thoracic Aorta ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Remodeling

Abstract Background: The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has become an important tool in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of long FET on spinal cord injury (SCI) and distal aortic remodeling after acute type A aortic dissection based on clinical and radiological outcomes.METHODS: From January 2018 to November 2019, 158 patients [mean age 51.8 years (range 32 - 78 years), 88.6% male] with acute type A aortic dissection were treated by FET with 100 mm (n=113) or 150 mm (n=45) open hybrid stent graft prosthesis. Patients were divided into two groups according to the length of FET. The clinical and radiological outcomes of the patients were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Postoperative outcomes did not differ significantly: in-hospital mortality (9.7% vs 6.7%, P=0.758) and SCI (5.3% vs 2.2%, P=0.674). Aortic remodeling, which was evaluated by aortic diameter, true lumen diameter, false lumen diameter and the rate of false lumen complete thrombosis, was more positive in long FET group in the descending thoracic aorta during the follow-up period. At the abdominal level, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. In the long FET group, the level of complete false lumen thrombosis was more extensive during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The long version of FET does not increase the risk of SCI in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. The application of long FET can achieve better results in terms of remodeling of the thoracic aorta in the short- and medium-term follow-up.

scholarly journals Complete Shrinkage of the Obliterated False Lumen After Open and Endovascular Chronic Aortic Dissection Stanford Type A Repair

Aorta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 61-63
Author(s):  
George Samanidis ◽  
Meletios Kanakis ◽  
Constantinos Ieromonachos ◽  
George Stavridis
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Circulatory Arrest ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Descending Thoracic Aorta ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Chronic Aortic Dissection ◽  
Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion

AbstractA 48-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with chronic aortic dissection Stanford Type A. His diagnosis was confirmed by chest multi-detector computed tomography (CT). The patient underwent combined (i.e., hybrid) open and endovascular repair (frozen elephant trunk) in a one-stage operation with moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade cerebral perfusion. His postoperative course was uneventful, and he was discharged home on postoperative day 9. At 2-year follow-up, chest CT angiography revealed complete shrinkage of the obliterated false lumen in the distal aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta.

scholarly journals Different aortic arch surgery methods for type A aortic dissection: clinical outcomes and follow-up results

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-262
Author(s):  
Yunxing Xue ◽  
Jun Pan ◽  
Hailong Cao ◽  
Fudong Fan ◽  
Xuan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Type A ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Arch Surgery

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes and follow-up results among 5 main aortic arch surgery methods for type A aortic dissection in a single centre. METHODS From 2002 to 2018, 958 type A aortic dissection patients who received surgical repair were divided into 5 groups according to the arch surgery method: hemiarch replacement (n = 206), island arch replacement (n = 54), total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (n = 425), triple-branched stent (n = 39) and fenestrated stent (n = 234). The indications for the different arch methods were related to the patient’s preoperative status, the location and extent of the dissection and the surgical ability of the surgeons. A comparative study was performed to identify the differences in the perioperative data, and the Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess the long-term survival and reintervention rates. Thirty matched surviving patients that were included in each group completed Computed tomography angiography to determine long-term reshaping effect. RESULTS The 30-day mortality rate was 15.8%, and there was no difference among the 5 groups (P = 0.848). The follow-up survival rates were similar among the 5 groups (P = 0.130), and the same was true for patients without reintervention (P = 0.471). In the propensity matching study, patients with stents (frozen elephant trunk, triple-branched stent, fenestrated stent) had a slower aortic dilation rate and a higher ratio of thrombosis in the false lumen at the descending aortic and abdominal aortic levels than patients without stents. CONCLUSIONS No standard method is available for arch surgery, and indications and long-term effects should be identified with clinical data. In our experiences, simpler surgical procedures could reduce mortality in critically ill patients and stents in the distal aorta could improve long-term reshape effects.

scholarly journals Early and long-term results of total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique for acute type A aortic dissection

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 707-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Yoshitake ◽  
Masato Tochii ◽  
Chiho Tokunaga ◽  
Jun Hayashi ◽  
Akitoshi Takazawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type A ◽  
Total Arch Replacement ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Long Term Survival

Abstract OBJECTIVES We evaluated the operative and long-term outcomes of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS This study evaluated 426 consecutive patients who underwent aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection from June 2007 to December 2018 at our centre. Of these, 139 patients underwent total arch replacement with FET (FET group), and 287 underwent other procedures (no FET group). Ninety-two patients in the FET group were matched to 92 patients in the no FET group by using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS Thirty-day mortality and neurological dysfunction were not significantly different between the FET and no FET groups (1.4% vs 2.4%, P = 0.50 and 5.0% vs 6.3%, P = 0.61, respectively). Long-term survival was better in the FET group than in the no FET group (P = 0.008). Freedom from distal thoracic reintervention was similar in the FET and no FET groups (P = 0.74). In the propensity-matched patients, freedom from aortic-related death was better in the FET group than in the no FET group (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS Operative outcomes showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. FET contributes to better long-term survival in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

scholarly journals Comparative study of the frozen elephant trunk and classical elephant trunk techniques to supplement total arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection†

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Inoue ◽  
Hitoshi Matsuda ◽  
Atsushi Omura ◽  
Yoshimasa Seike ◽  
Kyokun Uehara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Type A ◽  
Total Arch Replacement ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Cord Injury

Abstract OBJECTIVES In patients with acute type A aortic dissection, the use of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure with total arch replacement (TAR) has been indicated for emergency operations to obtain thrombosis of the distal false lumen (FL). However, data comparing the FET and the classical elephant trunk (CET) procedures, including the incidences of mortality, morbidity, spinal cord injury and aortic remodelling, have not yet been reported. The goal of this study was to compare the early outcomes of TAR with the FET and the CET procedures. METHODS The past 7 years of medical records of 323 patients with type A aortic dissection who underwent emergency surgery were reviewed retrospectively, and 148 patients who underwent TAR were shortlisted for the study. First, the patients were divided into 2 groups, the CET group (n = 115; age 65 ± 12 years) and FET group (n = 33; 67 ± 11 years), to compare the early operative outcomes, including mortality and morbidity. Second, 86 patients (CET 56; FET 30) fulfilling the inclusive criteria (inserted length of elephant trunk ≥5 cm, involvement of dissection at the descending aorta and sufficient computed tomographic evaluation at ≥6 months after the operation) were compared to evaluate the patency and diameter of the FL at each segment of the downstream aorta. RESULTS The in-hospital mortality rate was 8.1% (12/148), without significant differences between the 2 groups (CET 8.7% vs FET 6.1%; P = 1). No spinal cord ischaemia was encountered in either group. The incidence of postoperative FL patency at the level of the left lower pulmonary vein was 30% in the FET group, which was significantly lower than that in the preoperative state (73%) and in the CET group (77%). The downsizing of the aortic diameter at the distal edge of the CET or the FET, the left lower pulmonary vein and the coeliac axis was significant in the FET group 6 months after TAR. CONCLUSIONS According to our initial experience, the FET compared to the CET procedure showed comparable early complications and an advantage concerning FL thrombosis and aortic remodelling at early follow-up examinations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document