scholarly journals Mid-term results of zone 0 thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair after ascending aorta wrapping and supra-aortic debranching in high-risk patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 882-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felice Pecoraro ◽  
Mario Lachat ◽  
Michael Hofmann ◽  
Neal S. Cayne ◽  
Lyubov Chaykovska ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. e33-e34
Author(s):  
Joel L. Ramirez ◽  
Melinda S. Schaller ◽  
Bian Wu ◽  
Linda M. Reilly ◽  
Timothy A.M. Chuter ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1456-1462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel L. Ramirez ◽  
Melinda S. Schaller ◽  
Bian Wu ◽  
Linda M. Reilly ◽  
Timothy A.M. Chuter ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Fujii ◽  
Toshihiko Saga ◽  
Masahiko Onoe ◽  
Susumu Nakamoto ◽  
Toshio Kaneda ◽  
...  

Purpose We performed antegrade thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair via the ascending aorta in selected high-risk patients scheduled for open surgery, in whom an iliofemoral or abdominal aortic approach was not feasible. We present our initial experience with this approach. Methods Of 16 consecutive patients who underwent antegrade endovascular aneurysm repair via the ascending aorta at our institution, 3 had an emergency intervention for rupture and 3 had an urgent intervention for impending rupture or complicated aortic dissection. The procedure was scheduled in 10 patients. The median patient age was 77 years. In 13 patients, one or more concomitant procedures were performed. In 6 patients, vascular access for endovascular aneurysm repair was obtained via a branch of the replacement graft. In 10 patients, direct cannulation of the ascending aorta was carried out using 2 pursestring sutures. Results The initial success rate was 100%. Early mortality occurred in 2 (12.5%) patients because of multiple organ failure in one and heart failure in the other. No patient required a second intervention during follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was 19 months. Conclusion The antegrade approach is a useful alternative in patients with no access suitable for endovascular aneurysm repair and who are not appropriate candidates for open conventional thoracic aortic surgery. This approach is applicable to selected patients.


2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy A.M. Chuter ◽  
Linda M. Reilly ◽  
Rishad M. Faruqi ◽  
Robert B. Kerlan ◽  
Rajiv Sawhney ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Fabre ◽  
Elie Fadel ◽  
Philippe Brenot ◽  
Sarah Hamdi ◽  
Abel Gomez Caro ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 177 (5) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
P. A. Galkin ◽  
A. V. Svetliko

The objectiveof this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of infrarenal aorta (IA) and iliac arteries (IA) with favorable and unfavorable anatomy in the group of high-risk patients after surgery and at follow-up examinations.Material and methods. The study is based on the results of the study of 95 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and iliac arteries aneurysms who underwent EVAR at Healthcare «Clinical Hospital № 122 named after L.G. Sokolov» for the period from March 2008 to December 2016. RESULTS. Results of EVAR of infrarenal aorta and iliac arteries in patients with severe concomitant diseases were analyzed. The interventions were successful in 100 % of cases.Сonclusions.The study has shown that EVAR is an effective and safe method of treatment for endovascular aneurysm repair of infrarenal aorta and iliac arteries in high-risk patients. Long-term care requires abdominal aorta and iliac artery examination with the use of duplex ultrasound angioscanning and multispiral computed tomoangiography to identify specific complications.


2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1271-1279.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Egorova ◽  
Jeannine K. Giacovelli ◽  
Annetine Gelijns ◽  
Giampaolo Greco ◽  
Alan Moskowitz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document