scholarly journals Examining 1:1 vs. 4:1 Packed Red Blood Cell to Fresh Frozen Plasma Ratio Transfusion During Pediatric Burn Excision

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn Tejiram ◽  
Soman Sen ◽  
Kathleen S Romanowski ◽  
David G Greenhalgh ◽  
Tina L Palmieri

Abstract Blood transfusions following major burn injury are common due to operative losses, blood sampling, and burn physiology. While massive transfusion improves outcomes in adult trauma patients, literature examining its effect in critically ill children is limited. The study purpose was to prospectively compare outcomes of major pediatric burns receiving a 1:1 vs. 4:1 packed red blood cell to fresh frozen plasma transfusion strategy during massive burn excision. Children with >20% total body surface area burns were randomized to a 1:1 or 4:1 packed red blood cell/fresh frozen plasma transfusion ratio during burn excision. Parameters examined include patient demographics, burn size, pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) scores, pediatric logistic organ dysfunction scores, laboratory values, total blood products transfused, and the presence of blood stream infections or pneumonia. A total of 68 children who met inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups (n = 34). Mean age, PRISM scores, estimated blood loss (600 ml (400–1175 ml) vs. 600 ml (300–1150 ml), P = 0.68), ventilator days (5 vs. 9, P = 0.47), and length of stay (57 vs. 60 days, P = 0.24) had no difference. No differences in frequency of blood stream infection (20 vs. 18, P = 0.46) or pneumonia events (68 vs. 116, P = 0.08) were noted. On multivariate analysis, only total body surface area burn size, inhalation injury, and PRISM scores (P < 0.05) were significantly associated with infections.

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Galganski ◽  
David G. Greenhalgh ◽  
Soman Sen ◽  
Tina L. Palmieri

Transfusion ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 816-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavitha Subramaniam ◽  
Katrina Spilsbury ◽  
Oyekoya T. Ayonrinde ◽  
Faye Latchmiah ◽  
Syed A. Mukhtar ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 107S-108S
Author(s):  
Albert Pull Ter Gunne ◽  
Richard Skolasky ◽  
Hillary Ross ◽  
David Cohen

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 365-372
Author(s):  
Cyril Pernod ◽  
◽  
Laurie Fraticelli ◽  
Guillaume Marcotte ◽  
Bernard Floccard ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S55-S56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arek J Wiktor ◽  
Heather Carmichael ◽  
Elizabeth B Weber ◽  
Patrick Duffy ◽  
Anne L Lambert Wagner

Abstract Introduction Controversy exists over the use of colloid required for burn resuscitation. Data show that fresh frozen plasma (FFP) may have benefits beyond volume sparing alone, however, there are inherent risks including transfusion related acute lung injury (TRALI) and transfusion reactions (TR). The aims of this project were: (1) determine the effectiveness of early FFP during burn resuscitation, and (2) to document any potential side effects of FFP administration. Methods A retrospective review was performed on all burn patients aged >18 years old with >20% total body surface area (TBSA) burns who underwent resuscitation using our nursing guided resuscitation protocol (NGRP) from November 2016- June 2019 at our ABA- verified burn center. Excluded were those with electrical injury, delayed resuscitation, polytrauma, renal replacement therapy and or death within 24 hours (hrs) of injury. Pursuant to the NGRP all patients with >30% TBSA burns received FFP at 6–8 hrs post injury. Data recorded included: demographics, % TBSA burned, total crystalloid/FFP, and urine output (UO). An hourly resuscitation ratio (I/O ratio) of fluid given (ml/kg/%TBSA/hr) to UO (ml/kg/hr) was calculated. FFP initiation was standardized to time zero. Major complications such as abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), TRALI and TR were documented. Univariate statistical analysis was performed. Results Over the study period 71 patients required NGRP resuscitation, 56 met inclusion criteria. Baseline demographics included: 47 male (84%), median age 34 years [IQR 27–53], median TBSA 30% [range 20–95%]. 40 patients were resuscitated with FFP versus 16 patients resuscitated with crystalloid alone. Median time to FFP administration was 7 hours [IQR 6–8] with an average of 1866 ml infused [779–4484]. Those who received FFP had larger % TBSA burns median 41% [29–57] vs no FFP 22% [20–24], p< 0.001. Median I/O ratio at FFP initiation improved from 1.0 [IQR 0.4–3.7] to 0.4 [IQR 0.2–1.5, p=0.01] at 2 hrs post FFP, see Graph. Median UOP improved from 0.18 cc/kg/hr the 2 hrs prior to FFP administration, to 0.44 cc/kg/hr at 2 hrs post FFP (p=0.01). Total 24 hour fluids given (cc/kg/% TBSA) were similar in both groups: FFP 3.94 [3.49–5.36] vs no FFP 3.92 [3.54–4.53], p=0.77. There were no reported incidents of ACS, ARDS, TRALI, or TR. Conclusions The use of FFP in burn resuscitation significantly improves UOP and normalizes I/O ratios. FFP administration did not cause any serious complications. Applicability of Research to Practice Future research efforts should focus on comparing albumin vs FFP in acute burn resuscitation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document