Thin and Ultra-Thin Split-Thickness Skin Grafts Are Safe and Efficacious in the Burn Population

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 849-852
Author(s):  
Miranda A Chacon ◽  
Jacqueline Haas ◽  
Trevor C Hansen ◽  
Oren P Mushin ◽  
Derek E Bell
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Graft Take ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Surgeon Experience

Abstract Split-thickness skin-grafts are a mainstay of burn management. Studies suggest no benefit to using thick (0.025 inch) over standard (0.012–0.020 inch) grafts, and some support the use of thin (0.008 inch) over standard thickness. Data on the use of even thinner grafts is scarce. This study reviewed outcomes of burn patients treated with thin (0.008–0.011 inch) and ultra-thin (≤0.007 inch) grafts. Retrospective review of records from July 2012 to June 2016 included patients who sustained operative burns treated by a single surgeon. Patients were excluded for nonoperative injuries, inhalational injuries, or prolonged hospitalizations. Outcome measures were compared between thin and ultra-thin groups. One-hundred twenty-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 35 received thin split-thickness skin-grafts while 93 received ultra-thin. Cohort analysis demonstrated equivalent graft-take, time to reepithelialization, and functional outcomes. Time to donor-site healing was significantly faster in the ultra-thin cohort (P = .04). Of those with functional outcomes recorded, 88.1% had good-excellent function and 11.9% retained a limitation in function as designated in physical therapy notes. There were fewer complications overall (P = .004) and a lower incidence of hypertrophic scarring (P = .025) in the ultra-thin cohort. This study presents a single-surgeon experience with thin and ultra-thin split-thickness skin-grafts. These grafts are exhibit excellent graft-take and few complications. There was no correlation between thickness and functional outcome at the time of physical therapy discharge. Donor-site reepithelialization was faster with ultra-thin grafts, which may be important in patients with large burns and limited donor sites.

668 Fixation of Split-Thickness Skin Grafts with Liquid Adhesive and Fibrin Glue in Place of Staples

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S190-S191
Author(s):  
Joshua Frost ◽  
Nathan Hallier ◽  
Tanir Moreno ◽  
Jared Covell ◽  
Ryan Keck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fibrin Glue ◽  
Skin Grafting ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Intact Skin ◽  
Body Area ◽  
Wound Site ◽  
Graft Take ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Grafting

Abstract Introduction A critical component of split-thickness skin grafting is the fixation of the skin graft to the wound site. Graft displacement can result in graft failure, especially during the initial 48–72 hours following application. The most common method of securing grafts is with the use of staples, sometimes with the addition of fibrin glue in order to aid both graft adhesion and homeostasis. The use of staples, however, is associated with significant levels of patient discomfort, especially during staple removal. A possible alternative to staples is the use of liquid adhesives, in combination with steri-strips, to anchor the edges of skin grafts to intact skin. Certain liquid adhesives, such as gum-based resins, are cheaper to use than staples and offer the potential to secure small split-thickness skin grafts without the associated pain of staples. In this pilot study, we examined the effectiveness of using a combination of gum-based resin (Gum Mastic-Storax-Msal-Alcohol), fibrin glue, and steri-strips to secure partial-thickness grafts in 8 patients without the use of staples or sutures. Methods Patients were included in the study who required split-thickness skin grafts to treat wounds involving less than or equal to 15% total surface body area and whose wounds were not located in areas prone to graft displacement, such as the axilla and groin. For each patient, skin grafts were secured using fibrin glue (sprayed over the entire wound), and a combination of liquid adhesive and steri-strips applied around the wound perimeter. The success of each graft was determined by the percentage of graft take. Results From January 1st, 2020 to April 30th, 2020, 8 patients were identified who fit the inclusion criteria. Five of the patients received grafts to their lower extremities, two patients received grafts to their upper extremities, and one of the patients received a graft to the torso. The average wound site that was grafted was 116.7 cm2. Average graft take among the 8 patients was 96.9%, with a range of 90%-100%. No complications at the graft site were noted, such as hematomas or any other event that resulted in graft displacement or failure. Conclusions The results of the study demonstrate that a combination of liquid adhesive, fibrin glue, and steri-strips, can be used as an effective alternative to staples in small split-thickness skin grafts. The use of liquid adhesive in place of staples was advantageous because it eliminated to need for staple removal, which resulted in less discomfort for the patient and less work for the nursing staff.

scholarly journals Glans reconstruction with the use of an inverted urethral flap after distal penile amputation for carcinoma

2013 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Sansalone ◽  
Giulio Garaffa ◽  
Giuseppe Vespasiani ◽  
Alessandro Zucchi ◽  
Franklin Emmanuel Kuehhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Mucosa ◽  
Reconstructive Surgery ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Urinary Function ◽  
Thickness Skin

Restoration of adequate cosmesis and preservation of sexual and urinary function are the main goals of penile reconstructive surgery following amputation for carcinoma. Split thickness skin grafts and oral mucosa grafts have been widely used for the creation of a pseudoglans with excellent cosmetic and functional results. The main drawbacks associated with the use of grafts are donor site morbidity, the lack of engorgement of the pseudoglans and the risk of poor graft take, which may lead to contracture and poor cosmetic results. In the present series the long term cosmetic and functional outcomes of glans reconstruction with an inverted distal urethral flap are described.

scholarly journals Reconstruction of full thickness wounds using glyaderm in a single-staged procedure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa de Henau ◽  
Anne Sophie Kruit ◽  
Dietmar J. O. Ulrich
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Skin Surface ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Dermal Substitute ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Graft Take ◽  
Aesthetic Appearance ◽  
Thickness Skin

Abstract Introduction In large full-thickness skin defects, donor site morbidity limits the available thickness and surface of skin autografts and therefore only split-thickness skin grafts are possible for reconstruction. Dermal equivalents can be added to these split-thickness grafts to acquire an anatomically better skin reconstruction. Glyaderm is a human derived, acellular dermis and up until now has only been used in a two-staged procedure. This report describes results of a case series using Glyaderm and split-thickness skin grafts in a single-staged procedure. Methods Glyaderm was introduced in 2017 in Radboudumc (Nijmegen, The Netherlands). Glyaderm and autologous split-skin grafts were simultaneously applied to the wounds. In cases with large wound surfaces or wounds covering highly mobile areas, negative pressure wound therapy was additionally applied. The first ten cases were followed with regular intervals post-operatively, assessing graft take, scar appearance, post-operative wound problems and re-interventions. Results Patients were aged 3 weeks to 76 years-old. Treated skin surface varied from 1–16% total body surface. Wounds resulted from trauma (n = 4), burns (n = 4) or soft tissue infections (n = 2). Follow-up varied from 4 months to 1.5 years. No complications occurred after surgery. Average take rate was 98%. Two patients had a later re-intervention to further improve the aesthetic appearance of the scarred area. Conclusion Our first results with the application of Glyaderm in a single-staged procedure provided good healing, graft take and scar appearance. Glyaderm was found a suitable dermal substitute in the treatment of full thickness wounds.

scholarly journals Tumescent non-tumescent technique for split thickness skin graft harvesting

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 4026
Author(s):  
M. K. Rajendran
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Skin Grafting ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Recipient Site ◽  
Tumescent Technique ◽  
Graft Take ◽  
Thickness Skin

Background: Split-thickness skin graft failures can be attributed to flaws in the recipient bed which has to be well prepared. Tissues with limited blood supply such as bone, tendons, cartilage or sites with necrotic tissue or infection do not accept skin grafts. Adrenaline is used to harvest skin grafts due to its vasoconstriction effect which limits blood loss. The aim of our study was to determine skin graft take after tumescent technique compared to a non-tumescent technique for harvesting.Methods: Two treatment groups of patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned. Forty patients underwent split-thickness skin graft harvesting with tumescent technique and forty patients underwent non-tumescent split-thickness skin graft harvesting. The recipient site was opened in both groups on the fifth day after surgery and take rate assessed. The donor site was assessed on day ten and if not healed, followed up for three weeks.Results: There was a statistically significant association between skin graft take rate and skin grafting technique (p=0.011). The mean graft take rate was 2.5% higher in the tumescent group compared to the non-tumescent group (96.3% compared to 94%). On day 10, there was no difference in percentage healing of donor sites between the tumescent and non-tumescent groups, p=0.562.Conclusions: Tumescent technique significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss. It is safe, inexpensive and easy to use. The subdermal adrenaline/saline injection creates a smooth, dense surface which assists debridement and donor harvesting.

Reduction in Donor Site Morbidity: Full-Thickness Skin Columns vs Split-Thickness Skin Grafts

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. e186-e187
Author(s):  
Laura E. Cooper ◽  
Phillip M. Kemp Bohan ◽  
Tyler R. Everett ◽  
Javier A. Chapa ◽  
Sean E. Christy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Full Thickness Skin ◽  
Thickness Skin

scholarly journals CICAFAST: comparison of a biological dressing composed of fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes on a split-thickness skin graft donor site versus a traditional dressing: a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Poinas ◽  
Pierre Perrot ◽  
Judith Lorant ◽  
Olivier Nerrière ◽  
Jean-Michel Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Fetal Fibroblasts ◽  
Biological Dressing ◽  
Graft Donor

Abstract Background Wound repair is one of the most complex biological processes of human life. Allogeneic cell-based engineered skin substitutes provide off-the-shelf temporary wound coverage and act as biologically active dressings, releasing growth factors, cytokines and extracellular matrix components essential for proper wound healing. However, they are susceptible to immune rejection and this is their major weakness. Thanks to their low immunogenicity and high effectiveness in regeneration, fetal skin cells represent an attractive alternative to the commonly used autologous and allogeneic skin grafts. Methods/design We developed a new dressing comprising a collagen matrix seeded with a specific ratio of active fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes. These produce a variety of healing growth factors and cytokines which will increase the speed of wound healing and induce an immunotolerant state, with a slight inflammatory reaction and a reduction in pain. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the use of this biological dressing for wound healing at the split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site, reduces the time to healing, decreases other co-morbidities, such as pain, and improves the appearance of the scar. This investigation will be conducted as part of a randomized study comparing our new biological dressing with a conventional treatment in a single patient, thus avoiding the factors that may influence the healing of a graft donor site. Discussion This clinical trial should enable the development of a new strategy for STSG donor-wound healing based on a regenerative dressing. The pain experienced in the first few days of STSG healing is well known due to the exposure of sensory nerve endings. Reducing this pain will also reduce analgesic drug intake and the duration of sick leave. Our biological dressing will meet the essential need of surgeons to “re-crop” from existing donor sites, e.g., for thermal-burn patients. By accelerating healing, improving the appearance of the scar and reducing pain, we hope to improve the conditions of treatment for skin grafts. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03334656. Registered on 7 November 2017.

The scalp as a favorable donor site for limited-sized split-thickness skin grafts in comparison to the thigh donor site

2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 238-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Liebau ◽  
A. Arens ◽  
H. Kasten ◽  
V. Schwipper
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Thickness Skin
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document