Chinch Bug (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) Control with Insecticides on Wheat, Field Corn, and Grain Sorghum, 19811

1983 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leroy L. Peters
Keyword(s):  
Grain Sorghum ◽  
Wheat Field ◽  
Chinch Bug ◽  
Field Corn

Effect of Chinch Bug (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) Feeding in Seedling Field Corn

1985 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1370-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
José F. Negrón ◽  
Thomas J. Riley
Keyword(s):  
Chinch Bug ◽  
Field Corn

CHINCH BUG MANAGEMENT WITH FOLIAR INSECTICIDES ON GRAIN SORGHUM, 1999

2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. D. Torrey ◽  
J. L. Milligan ◽  
B. R. Leonard ◽  
B. Castro
Keyword(s):  
Grain Sorghum ◽  
Chinch Bug ◽  
Bug Management

scholarly journals CHINCH BUG MANAGEMENT IN GRAIN SORGHUM USING FOLIAR INSECTICIDES, 1998

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. Castro ◽  
T. J. Riley ◽  
K. D. Torrey ◽  
B. R. Leonard
Keyword(s):  
Grain Sorghum ◽  
Chinch Bug ◽  
Bug Management

New Grain Sorghum Sources of Antibiosis to the Chinch Bug (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae)

1986 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. Mize ◽  
G. Wilde
Keyword(s):  
Grain Sorghum ◽  
Chinch Bug

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES FOR CONTROL OF CHINCH BUG ON FIELD CORN, 2002

2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul McLeod ◽  
William Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Chinch Bug ◽  
Field Corn

Effects of Soil-Applied AC 263,222 on Crops Rotated with Soybean (Glycine Max)

1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marshall B. Wixson ◽  
David R. Shaw
Keyword(s):  
Glycine Max ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Grain Sorghum ◽  
Italian Ryegrass ◽  
Treated Soil ◽  
Field Corn ◽  
Ac 263,222 ◽  
Shoot Weight ◽  
Biomass Reduction ◽  
Corn Grain

The effects of the imidazolinone herbicide AC 263,222 on crops that may be rotated with soybean were studied in the greenhouse and field. Corn, grain sorghum, cotton, rice, wheat, soybean, and Italian ryegrass were planted directly into treated soil after AC 263,222 was incorporated. In the field, AC 263,222 at rates as high as 35 g ai ha–1did not reduce shoot weight or emergence of these species. Some visual injury occurred, but was 20% or less 28 d after planting for all crops. Crops were more sensitive in the greenhouse, where reductions in both shoot and root dry weight were observed. AC 263,222 at 13, 13, and 7 g ha–1reduced corn, grain sorghum, and Italian ryegrass shoot weights, respectively. Cotton, rice, and wheat tolerated rates from 27 to 55 g ha–1. Biomass reduction occurred with all crops at 55 g ha–1and above. Because AC 263,222 will be registered for use in soybean at 9 to 18 g ha–1, and potential rotational crops were planted immediately after soil treatment, problems with injury to these crops are not expected.

scholarly journals CHINCH BUG MANAGEMENT WITH FOLIAR INSECTICIDES ON FIELD CORN, 1999

2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. D. Torrey ◽  
J. L. Milligan ◽  
B. R. Leonard ◽  
B. Castro
Keyword(s):  
Chinch Bug ◽  
Field Corn ◽  
Bug Management

Chinch Bug Management with Foliar Insecticides in Field Corn, 1997

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-195
Author(s):  
J. H. Fife ◽  
B. R. Leonard ◽  
K. D. Torrey ◽  
T. J. Riley ◽  
B. A. Castro
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Delivery System ◽  
Untreated Control ◽  
Research Station ◽  
Silt Loam ◽  
Corn Seed ◽  
Chinch Bug ◽  
Field Corn ◽  
Corn Plants ◽  
Bug Management

Abstract The efficacy of selected insecticide treatments was compared with that of an untreated control at the Macon Ridge location of the Northeast Research Station near Winnsboro, LA. Corn seed was planted in a Gigger silt loam (pH = 6.1, 1.1% organic matter) on 27 Mar in 2-row plots (40 inch centers) X 40 ft. Treatments were arranged in a RCB design with four replications. Treatments were applied with a handboom and a CO2-charged delivery system calibrated to deliver 10 gpa through 8002 flat-fan nozzles (2/row) at 28 psi. Insecticides were applied on 14 May to V5 stage corn plants. Ten plants/plot were randomly chosen for sampling on 16 and 20 May. Total numbers of chinch bugs were recorded by visually examining mainstems of the plant and leaf sheaths. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and means were separated according to DMRT. Rainfall did not influence the results of this test.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document